Notice of Disqualification – Amir Helac – 18 October 2023

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2023N00446 In force Notifiable Instrument

Legislation content

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Amir Helac – 18 October 2023

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

Amir Helac

 

HOLLAND PARK WEST QLD 4121

 

I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.

 

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 18 October 2023

 

 

Emma Rosenzweig

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

Per Pamela Vincent


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to provide a regulatory framework that ensures the proper administration and management of superannuation funds, thereby maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the retirement savings of Australians by enforcing standards of competence, integrity, and financial soundness among those who manage superannuation funds. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act in a manner that justifies such a sanction. This legislative measure is designed to deter misconduct and ensure that those entrusted with managing superannuation funds act in the best interests of the fund members.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities in Australia. The Act provides for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, custodians, and other responsible officers who manage superannuation funds. It applies to all such persons and entities across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring compliance with standards designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act's provisions can be enforced through subordinate instruments, which may further specify requirements and standards. Notably, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or to be a responsible officer of such a body corporate, with penalties including up to two years imprisonment. The Act also allows for the publication of disqualification notices as Notifiable Instruments in the Federal Register of Legislation and provides mechanisms for reconsideration or revocation of disqualifications.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals who contravene the Act in a serious manner. Specifically, under subsection 126A(1), an individual can be disqualified if they have contravened the Act and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies such a measure. The disqualification is notified by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, as illustrated in the notice to Amir Helac (subsection 126A(6)). This notice was issued by Emma Rosenzweig, who is a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, informing Amir Helac that he has been disqualified under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA. The notice states that the disqualification is effective from the day it is made. The Act imposes several obligations on individuals it governs. One such obligation is that a disqualified person must not act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, nor should they be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that holds such roles within a superannuation entity (section 126K). The seriousness of the contraventions leading to disqualification must be such that it justifies the disqualification. Furthermore, the details of the disqualification are required to be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation (subsection 126A(7)). Additionally, the Act allows for the possibility of revoking the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual (subsection 126A(5)). Any breach of the provisions regarding disqualification is treated seriously under the SISA. Specifically, it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate fulfilling such roles (section 126K). The penalty for committing this offence can be severe, with a maximum punishment of two years in jail. Furthermore, if an affected individual is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, providing reasons why they believe the decision is incorrect (section 344).

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Notifiable instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Repeal & Amendment
Catchwords
Disqualification
Contraventions
Revocation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.