NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Allan Rose – 9 June 2026
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Allan Rose
WHYALLA STUART SA 5608
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1).
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 9 June 2026
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Sherad Samuel
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed responsibly and in the best interests of members. The Act was introduced to address the need for oversight and regulation of superannuation entities, given their significant role in providing retirement benefits to Australians. The SISA was enacted by the Australian Parliament to provide a framework for the supervision of superannuation entities and to protect the interests of superannuation members. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity, efficiency, and stability of the superannuation industry, ensuring that funds are managed in a way that safeguards members' retirement savings. The Act includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification issued to Allan Rose, demonstrating the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its requirements.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) governs the administration and oversight of superannuation entities in Australia, impacting a range of individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds. This Act applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, and it includes the authority to disqualify individuals from acting in these capacities if there are breaches of the Act's provisions. The jurisdictional reach of the SISA extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring uniformity in the regulation of superannuation activities. Notably, the Act includes provisions for the publication of disqualifications as notifiable instruments, enhancing transparency and accountability. While the Act broadly covers all relevant entities and persons within its scope, certain exclusions or exemptions may apply based on specific conditions or subordinate instruments. These instruments can further extend or clarify the application of the Act, thereby ensuring that its provisions are comprehensively and effectively enforced.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains several key provisions regarding the disqualification of individuals involved in the superannuation industry. Under subsection 126A(6) (1), a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify an individual who has contravened the Act on one or more occasions, particularly if the seriousness of the contraventions warrants such action. The disqualification notice, such as the one issued to Allan Rose on 9 June 2026, takes effect immediately upon issuance. This formal notice explains the reasons for the disqualification, citing the contravention of the SISA and the grounds for the decision. As per subsection 126A(7) (2), the details of this disqualification are published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the disqualified person, in this case, Allan Rose. Under section 126K (3), it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such positions. This restriction is intended to prevent disqualified individuals from continuing to exert influence over superannuation funds, ensuring the integrity and proper administration of these entities. Failure to comply with this prohibition can lead to serious legal consequences.
The SISA also stipulates severe penalties for breaches of the disqualification provisions. According to section 126K (4), any disqualified person who knowingly contravenes the Act by acting in restricted capacities can be subject to criminal charges. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats such breaches. Additionally, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified person, as per subsection 126A(5) (5). For those affected by the disqualification decision and unsatisfied with it, section 344 (6) provides an avenue for reconsideration by the Commissioner, requiring a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, outlining the reasons for dissatisfaction.