NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Alison Maree
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Alison Maree
Sans Souci NSW 2219
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 July 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pam Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for better regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act provides a framework for the supervision and regulation of superannuation entities, trustees, and responsible officers to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament with the policy objective of ensuring the proper administration of superannuation funds, maintaining the integrity of the superannuation system, and safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. This legislation allows the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from being involved in the management of superannuation entities if they have been responsible for serious breaches of the Act. The disqualification aims to deter misconduct and promote accountability within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to a broad range of individuals and entities within the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. The Act seeks to ensure the proper management and oversight of superannuation funds, which are critical to the financial security of many Australians. The Act has a national reach, applying across all states and territories within Australia, and its provisions are enforced by the Commissioner of Taxation, who may delegate certain powers to other officers. The disqualification provision outlined in the notice to Alison Maree operates under subsection 126A(2) of the Act, where the delegate of the Commissioner can disqualify a person from participating in the management of superannuation entities if there have been serious contraventions of the Act while that person was a responsible officer. The disqualification is immediate upon issuance and can be subject to review or revocation as per the provisions of subsection 126A(5). Additionally, any person who acts in a capacity prohibited by section 126K after being disqualified faces criminal penalties, including up to two years in jail.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions for the disqualification of individuals who are found to be unfit to manage superannuation funds. Section 126A(2) provides that the Commissioner of Taxation may disqualify a person from performing certain roles if they have reason to believe that the person is unsuitable, for example, due to multiple or serious breaches of the Act. Section 126A(6) requires that the Commissioner must give written notice to the disqualified person, as demonstrated in the notice given to Alison Maree. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice, as per section 126A(7).
The Act imposes specific obligations on parties involved in the administration of superannuation funds. For instance, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with the SISA and take appropriate steps to prevent breaches. Additionally, trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities must act in the best interests of the members and beneficiaries of the fund. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in disqualification under section 126A.
Section 126K of the SISA outlines the penalties for individuals who continue to act in prohibited roles despite being disqualified. It is an offence to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity if one knows they are disqualified. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, as stated in the notice to Alison Maree. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the revocation of a disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
For Alison Maree, or any other disqualified person, there is an avenue for reconsideration of the decision. Section 344 of the SISA permits the Commissioner to review the decision if the disqualified person submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification. This request must articulate the reasons why the decision should be reconsidered, providing an opportunity for the person to address any perceived errors in the decision-making process.