NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ms Alida Visintin
WILLIAMSTOWN VIC 3016
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 9 October 2017
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Debra Goldfinch
Director, Engagement and Assurance, Superannuation
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation established a framework to ensure the proper administration and investment of superannuation funds, with a focus on protecting the interests of fund members. The Act aims to promote trust and confidence in the superannuation system by imposing strict compliance and governance requirements on entities involved in the industry. The SISA provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if they have been associated with entities that have contravened the Act, thus safeguarding the integrity of the system. In the case of Ms Alida Visintin, she has been disqualified under the SISA due to her association with a corporate trustee that has contravened the Act, with the disqualification taking immediate effect.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and corporate trustees involved in the management of superannuation entities in Australia. This Act encompasses a wide range of entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. Its jurisdiction extends across the entire Commonwealth of Australia, thereby affecting entities and individuals nationwide. The Act's primary purpose is to ensure compliance with strict regulatory standards to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. However, specific exclusions and exemptions within the Act pertain to certain types of superannuation entities or transactions, but these are not detailed in the notice provided. The scope of the Act can be further defined or modified through subordinate legislation, which may include regulations or guidelines that offer additional clarity or specific provisions. The disqualification notice to Ms Alida Visintin exemplifies the Act's enforcement mechanisms, highlighting its role in maintaining the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds within the Australian financial system.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have acted as responsible officers for corporate trustees that have contravened the Act. Section 126A of the SISA provides that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation may disqualify a person if they are satisfied that the person was a responsible officer of the corporate trustee at the time of the contraventions, and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provide grounds for disqualification. In this case, Ms Alida Visintin has been disqualified under this section.
The Act imposes a range of obligations on responsible officers of corporate trustees, including ensuring that the trustee complies with its obligations under the SISA. This includes obligations to ensure that the superannuation entity is properly established, administered and reported on, and that it complies with its legal and regulatory obligations. If a responsible officer is found to have contravened the SISA, they may be disqualified from performing their role, as has occurred in this case.
Section 126K of the SISA provides that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian, of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail. This means that Ms Visintin is not only disqualified from performing her role, but also that she may face criminal charges if she continues to act in a role that is prohibited by the Act.
The SISA also provides for the revocation of disqualifications. Under subsection 126A(5), a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation may revoke a disqualification on their own initiative or on the written application of the disqualified person. In this case, Ms Visintin may apply in writing for the revocation of her disqualification. If the Commissioner is satisfied that the grounds for disqualification no longer exist, they may revoke the disqualification. Finally, section 344 of the SISA provides that if Ms Visintin is affected by this decision and is not satisfied with it, she can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and must give the reasons she thinks the decision is wrong.