NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
AISAKE T LEAAETOA
BIRRONG NSW 2143
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 8 October 2019
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Mark Webberley
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the administration of superannuation funds and to ensure the financial security of Australians' retirement savings. The Act was introduced to address the problem of misconduct and breaches of trust within the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by imposing stringent compliance and governance requirements on trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity and reliability of the superannuation system, thereby ensuring that members' retirement savings are managed responsibly and ethically. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who have acted in a manner that justifies such action, ensuring that those who fail to uphold the standards set by the Act are held accountable.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities and encompasses both individuals and entities within its jurisdiction. The act is administered at the Commonwealth level and its reach is national, affecting all superannuation entities operating within Australia. The act seeks to maintain high standards of conduct within the superannuation industry by disqualifying individuals who are found to be responsible for serious breaches of the act. The disqualification process is stringent, as evidenced by the notice given to AISA KE T LEAAETOA of BIRRONG, NSW, who was disqualified due to his role in corporate trustee contraventions. This disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance. The act also includes provisions for the revocation of disqualifications and outlines serious penalties for those who continue to act in their disqualified capacity, including up to two years in jail. The act's application can be further extended or clarified through subordinate instruments, allowing for detailed regulation and enforcement mechanisms to be established.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification provided under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines the primary operative sections that govern the disqualification process. Section 126A(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must give notice to the disqualified individual, in this case, Aisake T. Leaetoa. Section 126A(2) of the Act allows for disqualification if it is found that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA, and the individual was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. The seriousness of the contraventions provides sufficient grounds for disqualification. This process ensures that those who are responsible for the governance of superannuation entities are held accountable for any breaches of the Act.
The SISA imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with the Act to avoid disqualification. They are required to maintain high standards of governance and financial management within the superannuation entities they oversee. Failure to adhere to these standards can lead to personal disqualification, as seen in the case of Aisake T. Leaetoa. The Act also mandates that any contraventions by the corporate trustee must be reported and addressed promptly.
The legislation imposes strict penalties for breaches, as outlined in section 126K of the SISA. It is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity if they are aware of their disqualification. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year jail term, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats such breaches. Additionally, the notice informs that the details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette under subsection 126A(7).
For individuals like Aisake T. Leaetoa who are affected by the disqualification, there are provisions for reconsideration. Under section 344 of the SISA, the individual can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if they are not satisfied with it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and must include the reasons for believing the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism for reviewing the decision and potentially having the disqualification revoked. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the disqualification to be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application from the disqualified individual.