NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Abdirahman Mohamed
BANKSTOWN NSW 2200
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 27 September 2018
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Craig Blair
Director
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to establish a regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced to address the need for improved regulation and oversight to protect the interests of superannuation fund members, thereby ensuring the integrity and stability of the industry. The Act is administered by the Australian Taxation Office, which is tasked with enforcing compliance with the various provisions outlined within the statute. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the superannuation savings of Australians by ensuring that superannuation entities are managed in a responsible and transparent manner. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with powers to disqualify individuals who have breached the provisions of the Act, thereby protecting the superannuation system from malpractice and maladministration.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. This federal legislation is administered by the Australian Taxation Office and has a national reach across all states and territories of Australia. The Act imposes a disqualification regime for individuals who breach its provisions, which may result in serious consequences, including the prohibition of acting in a responsible capacity within the superannuation industry. The disqualification can be imposed for contraventions of the Act that are significant in nature or number. The Act also outlines the process for reconsideration of decisions and potential revocation of disqualifications. Furthermore, it specifies the criminal penalties for individuals who continue to act in a prohibited capacity despite being disqualified, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The Act may extend its application through subordinate instruments, though the primary legislative text is the primary source of its scope and enforcement mechanisms.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are subsections 126A(1) and 126A(6). Section 126A(1) provides the authority to disqualify individuals who contravene the SISA, while subsection 126A(6) mandates the provision of a notice of disqualification. This notice, as given to Mr Abdirahman Mohamed, informs him that he has been disqualified due to multiple serious contraventions of the SISA. The disqualification takes immediate effect as per subsection 126A(6).
The SISA imposes various obligations and requirements on individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry. These include adherence to the legislative standards, proper management and investment of superannuation funds, and maintaining transparency and accountability. Mr Mohamed, by being disqualified, is expected to comply with the restriction on acting in any capacity related to superannuation entities, such as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian. His disqualification serves as a punitive measure and a preventive tool to ensure compliance with the SISA's provisions.
There are significant consequences for breaching the SISA. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity related to a superannuation entity. This includes being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian, or serving as a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that holds such roles. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail, underscoring the seriousness of non-compliance with the Act. The notice to Mr Mohamed explicitly warns against such activities post-disqualification.
Additionally, the SISA provides mechanisms for the revocation of a disqualification. According to subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either by the authority on its own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified individual. For Mr Mohamed, this offers a potential path to reinstatement should he meet the requisite conditions and demonstrates compliance with the SISA. Furthermore, under section 344, Mr Mohamed has the right to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided he submits a written request detailing the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision.