Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003
Notice of declaration of security regulated offshore facility – YOLLA-A
I, JACQUELINE IRELAND, Director, Transport Security Operations, Office of Transport Security, under subsection 17B(1) of the Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003 (the Act):
REVOKE the declaration of Yolla-A as a security regulated offshore facility as published in the Gazette (No. S 71, 16 May 2006); and
DECLARE that Yolla-A, which is located in an offshore area and used in the extraction of petroleum from the seabed or its subsoil with equipment on, or forming part of the facility, the location and boundaries of which are shown on the attached map, to be a security regulated offshore facility.
This Notice commences upon publication in the Gazette.
Date: 01 March 2018
Jacqui Ireland
Delegate of the Secretary of the
Department of Home Affairs
Note:
1) Gazette means the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette
2) This Notice remains in force until otherwise revoked in writing and upon subsequent publication in the Gazette.
Overview
The Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for securing maritime transport and offshore facilities against threats such as terrorism and sabotage. This legislation was introduced to fill a gap in the protection of critical infrastructure in Australia's maritime and offshore sectors, ensuring that these facilities are adequately safeguarded to prevent disruptions to national security and economic stability. The Act empowers the relevant authorities to declare certain offshore facilities as security regulated, thereby imposing specific security measures and oversight. The policy objective of the Act is to enhance the security of maritime transport and offshore facilities, thereby protecting Australia's interests and maintaining the integrity of its offshore operations.
Scope and Application
The Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003 applies to any offshore facilities involved in the extraction of petroleum from the seabed or its subsoil, including the Yolla-A facility. This Act is applicable to entities operating in the Commonwealth of Australia, extending its jurisdictional reach to all maritime and offshore activities within Australia's territorial waters. The declaration of an offshore facility as a security regulated offshore facility under this Act ensures that stringent security measures are implemented to safeguard against potential threats. The Act mandates that such facilities adhere to security regulations prescribed by the Director, Transport Security Operations, as demonstrated in the revocation and subsequent declaration of the Yolla-A facility. This regulatory framework does not specify particular exclusions or exemptions but rather mandates compliance for all designated offshore facilities, with enforcement mechanisms that may be extended or detailed in subordinate instruments. The application of the Act is thus comprehensive, covering all relevant offshore petroleum extraction activities within the Australian jurisdiction.
Key Provisions
The Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003 (the Act) provides a legal framework for ensuring the security of maritime transport and offshore facilities. Section 17B(1) allows the Director, Transport Security Operations, to make declarations regarding the status of offshore facilities. In this case, the Director, Jacqueline Ireland, has exercised her authority under subsection 17B(1) to revoke the previous declaration that Yolla-A was a security regulated offshore facility, as published in the Gazette (No. S 71, 16 May 2006). Concurrently, Jacqueline Ireland has declared Yolla-A to be a security regulated offshore facility, effective from the date of this notice's publication in the Gazette.
Under the Act, certain obligations and requirements are imposed on the entities governing offshore facilities. Section 17B(2) mandates that the Director can make such declarations based on the potential risk to public health and safety, national security, or the environment. The declaration requires the facility to comply with specific security measures as outlined in the Act. This includes the implementation of security plans and the adherence to the provisions laid out in the security regulations. These regulations are designed to ensure that the facilities maintain a certain level of security to prevent and respond to potential threats.
The Act also outlines the consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. Section 150 stipulates that any person who fails to comply with a security direction issued under the Act can be subject to civil or criminal penalties. For civil penalties, section 151 provides that the maximum penalty for an individual is $330,000 or five times the benefit obtained from the contravention, whichever is greater. In the case of corporations, the penalty can be significantly higher, up to $1.65 million. Section 153 further outlines that criminal penalties can also be imposed, with the maximum penalty for an individual being six months imprisonment and for a corporation, a fine of up to $8.25 million. These penalties underscore the importance of compliance with the security measures mandated by the Act.