Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003
Notice of declaration of security regulated OFFSHORE FACILITY – ARMADA CLAIRE
I, STEPHEN J WEBER, Director, Transport Security Operations, Office of Transport
Security, under subsection 17B(1) of the Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security
Act 2003 (the Act):
REVOKE the declaration of Armada Claire as a security regulated offshore facility
as published in the Gazette (C2015G00388 on 18 March 2015).
This Notice commences upon publication in the Gazette.
Date: 1 April 2016
Delegate of the Secretary of the
Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development
Note:
1) Gazette means the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette
2) This Notice remains in force until otherwise revoked in writing and upon subsequent publication in the Gazette.
RAT343-01
Overview
The Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003 was enacted to address the need for improved security measures for maritime transport and offshore facilities in Australia. This Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament with the objective of enhancing national security by ensuring that offshore facilities are adequately protected against potential threats. By regulating security for these facilities, the Act aims to safeguard the interests of the nation, its people, and its maritime industry, thereby contributing to the overall safety and security of Australia's maritime borders. The Act provides a legal framework for the implementation of security measures and the designation of facilities that require such measures, ensuring a coordinated approach to maritime and offshore security across the country.
Scope and Application
The Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003 applies to offshore facilities within the Commonwealth of Australia that are designated as security regulated, impacting various industries involved in maritime transport and offshore operations. The Act is concerned with ensuring the security of these facilities to prevent threats and unauthorised actions that could compromise national security. The scope of the Act encompasses specific entities and persons, including facility operators and individuals responsible for the security of these offshore installations. The Act's jurisdictional reach is national, covering all offshore facilities within Australian waters, thereby extending its influence across all states and territories. Notably, the Act allows for the declaration and revocation of security-regulated status of offshore facilities through subordinate instruments, as evidenced by the revocation of Armada Claire's status as a security regulated offshore facility. Such changes are communicated via the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette, ensuring transparency and adherence to the legislative framework.
Key Provisions
The Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003 (the Act) contains several key provisions, including those that regulate security for offshore facilities. Under section 17B(1), the Act allows the Director of Transport Security Operations to revoke the declaration of a facility as a security-regulated offshore facility. This means that the Director has the authority to remove the designation of a facility as being subject to specific security regulations and requirements. In the present case, this authority is exercised to revoke the designation of Armada Claire as a security-regulated offshore facility, as published in the Gazette (C2015G00388 on 18 March 2015). This revocation notice is effective upon its publication in the Gazette.
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties or entities it governs. For example, offshore facilities that are designated as security-regulated must adhere to the specific security measures and protocols outlined in the Act. These measures are designed to protect the facility from potential security threats and ensure the safety and security of personnel, property, and the environment. The revocation of Armada Claire's designation as a security-regulated offshore facility means that the facility is no longer subject to these specific security requirements. However, it is important to note that the facility may still be subject to other relevant safety and security regulations under different Acts or regulations.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003 may result in various offences, penalties, or civil and criminal consequences. Under section 21 of the Act, a person who contravenes a provision of the Act may be subject to a penalty. The maximum penalty for an individual is $22,200, while the maximum penalty for a body corporate is $111,000. Additionally, a person who intentionally or recklessly causes a contravention of the Act may be subject to criminal charges, which could result in imprisonment for up to two years for an individual or five years for a body corporate. It is essential for parties and entities governed by the Act to be aware of their obligations and requirements to avoid potential penalties and legal consequences.
In summary, the Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security Act 2003 contains key provisions that regulate the security of offshore facilities, including the authority to revoke the designation of a facility as a security-regulated offshore facility (section 17B(1)). The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties and entities it governs, such as adherence to security measures and protocols. Failure to comply with the Act may result in penalties, including fines and potential criminal charges. In the present case, the Director of Transport Security Operations has exercised the authority to revoke the designation of Armada Claire as a security-regulated offshore facility, effective upon publication in the Gazette.