NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF DISQUALIFICATION – SALLY MESHEL – 15 May 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
SALLY MESHEL
KINGSFORD NSW 2031
I, Andrew Orme, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 344(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have confirmed your disqualification under subsection 344(4) of the SISA.
I have confirmed your disqualification as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The confirmation of disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 15 May 2025
Andrew Orme
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Manisha Karre
Note 1:
Under subsection 126(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126k of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 44(8) of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to review the decision within 28 days of the Commissioner giving notification of this decision.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that the interests of superannuation fund members are protected. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament with the policy objective of enhancing the oversight and governance of superannuation entities to prevent misconduct and financial mismanagement. The Act establishes a framework for the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry, including the powers of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) in monitoring and enforcing compliance. The confirmation of disqualification under the Act is a significant measure aimed at deterring and penalising serious breaches of superannuation laws, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification issued to Sally Meshel. The notice confirms her disqualification from acting in roles that involve the management or oversight of superannuation entities, reflecting the seriousness of the contraventions identified. This legislative action underscores the commitment to maintaining integrity and trust within the superannuation sector.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds within Australia. This includes trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act’s jurisdiction spans the entire Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a uniform regulatory framework across all states and territories. The Act imposes strict regulatory standards and compliance requirements on those involved in the superannuation industry to protect the interests of fund members. The Act also extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and determinations, which can provide further clarification or impose additional requirements on industry participants. However, certain exclusions and exemptions may apply, typically for smaller entities or specific types of superannuation arrangements, as detailed in the Act and its subordinate instruments. Notably, the Act explicitly prohibits disqualified individuals from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry, with significant penalties for non-compliance.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides mechanisms for disqualifying individuals who have contravened its provisions. Section 344(4) allows for the disqualification of an individual if they have contravened the Act, and section 344(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must give notice of the disqualification. In the case of Sally Meshel, the notice confirms her disqualification under these provisions, effective from the date of issuance, 15 May 2025. This disqualification is based on the determination that her contraventions of the SISA are serious enough to warrant such action.
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals like Sally Meshel. Under section 126k, a disqualified person is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or being a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles. These roles are critical in the administration and management of superannuation funds, and the Act seeks to protect fund members by ensuring that only fit and proper individuals manage these funds. Failure to adhere to these obligations can result in severe consequences, including criminal charges and penalties.
Breaching the obligations outlined in the SISA can lead to significant consequences. Section 126k specifies that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the restricted roles mentioned. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act treats these prohibitions. Additionally, details of the disqualification are required to be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation under section 126(7), ensuring transparency and public accountability. Individuals affected by the disqualification decision have the right to seek a review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal within 28 days of the notification, as stipulated in subsection 44(8) of the Act. This provision allows for a formal review process, providing a safeguard against potential injustices in the disqualification process.