NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF DISQUALIFICATION – MUHAMMAD ARSHAD - 5 July 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Muhammad Arshad
GARRAN ACT 2605
I, Andrew Orme, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 344(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision under subsection 344(4) of the SISA to confirm the disqualification notice issued to you on 4 October 2023.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 July 2024
Andrew Orme
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Manisha Karre
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring that it operates efficiently, transparently, and in the best interests of members. The Act addresses the problem of ensuring proper governance and accountability within the superannuation industry by establishing a framework for the supervision and regulation of superannuation entities. The policy objective of the SISA is to protect the interests of superannuation members by ensuring that their funds are managed in a prudent and responsible manner. The SISA provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who are unfit to manage superannuation funds, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the superannuation system. The notice of confirmation of disqualification issued to Muhammad Arshad under the SISA highlights the enforcement of these regulations, ensuring that disqualified individuals are prevented from acting in roles that could compromise the security and management of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) governs the regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, encompassing various entities and individuals involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds. The Act applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with standards designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The geographic reach of the Act is national, with its provisions extending across all states and territories of Australia. The Act imposes restrictions and disqualifications on individuals found to have engaged in misconduct or breaches of the law, with specific penalties and enforcement mechanisms to deter non-compliance. Exclusions and exemptions from the Act's provisions are limited and generally pertain to certain types of superannuation entities or specific circumstances outlined in the legislation. The application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which provide additional regulatory detail and guidance on its implementation. The notice of confirmation of disqualification in this instance underscores the serious consequences for individuals found to be in breach of the Act's provisions, including potential criminal penalties for continued involvement in prohibited activities.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this notice pertain to the disqualification of Muhammad Arshad under subsection 344(4) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA). This disqualification, which was initially issued on 4 October 2023, has now been confirmed by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, Andrew Orme, and is effective from the date of the notice, 5 July 2024. This notice informs Muhammad Arshad of the decision to uphold the earlier disqualification order.
Under the SISA, the disqualification imposes specific obligations on Muhammad Arshad. Primarily, it prohibits him from acting or being involved in certain capacities within a superannuation entity. Specifically, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to serve as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds these roles. This prohibition is intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.
Failure to adhere to the disqualification has serious legal consequences. According to section 126K of the SISA, any disqualified person who knowingly engages in the prohibited activities faces potential criminal penalties. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is a two-year imprisonment term, underscoring the seriousness of the disqualification. Additionally, under subsection 126A(7), the details of this disqualification will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public accountability.
For those affected by the disqualification decision, there is a provision for reconsideration under section 344 of the SISA. If Muhammad Arshad is dissatisfied with the decision, he has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision and should outline the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner's delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This flexibility allows for potential rectification if new information comes to light or if the circumstances warrant a review of the disqualification.