Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 1993
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF AN INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
I, Anthony Ian Fleming, Delegate of the Minister for the Environment, give notice pursuant to Regulation 7 of the Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 1993 that I have determined pursuant to 12H and 12J of the Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) Act 1980 that the Infrasound Station that Geoscience Australia has proposed to install in the Vestfold Hills in the Australian Antarctic Territory is likely to have a minor or transitory impact on the environment, and I have authorised Geoscience Australia to carry on the activity.
To obtain a copy of the Initial Environmental Evaluation, please contact:
Ms. Adrienne Moseley
Geoscience Australia
GPO Box 378
Canberra
ACT 2601
Dr A.I. Fleming
Delegate of the Minister for the Environment
11 December 2014
Overview
The Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 1993 were introduced to ensure that any activity conducted in the Australian Antarctic Territory is assessed for its potential environmental impact. This legislative framework was enacted to address the need for stringent environmental oversight in a region of global significance, particularly under the provisions of the Antarctic Treaty System, which includes the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. The Regulations provide the regulatory structure required for conducting environmental impact assessments and ensuring compliance with the environmental protection measures outlined in the Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) Act 1980. The policy objective is to safeguard the Antarctic environment, particularly given the unique and fragile nature of the region, while still allowing for necessary scientific research and activities that contribute to global knowledge. The enactment of these regulations is a reflection of Australia’s commitment to the stewardship of the Antarctic environment, aligning with international obligations and environmental best practices.
Scope and Application
The Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 1993 applies to activities in the Australian Antarctic Territory, impacting the conduct and operations of entities involved in research and other activities in this region. Specifically, the regulations govern the environmental impact assessment process required before any activity is carried out in the Antarctic, ensuring that potential environmental harm is minimised. The act applies to entities such as Geoscience Australia, which must comply with the regulations when proposing new projects like the Infrasound Station in the Vestfold Hills. The determination process is overseen by the Delegate of the Minister for the Environment, who evaluates the potential environmental impact of proposed activities and authorises them if deemed to have a minor or transitory impact. The geographic reach of these regulations is confined to the Australian Antarctic Territory, adhering to the broader framework established by the Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) Act 1980. The regulations also provide avenues for public access to the Initial Environmental Evaluation documents, facilitating transparency and public engagement in the environmental assessment process.
Key Provisions
The Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 1993 (Regulations) outline procedures for assessing the environmental impact of proposed activities in the Australian Antarctic Territory. Specifically, Regulation 7 requires a delegate of the Minister for the Environment to determine whether a proposed activity is likely to have a minor or transitory impact on the environment. This determination is made pursuant to sections 12H and 12J of the Antarctic Treaty (Environment Protection) Act 1980 (Act). In this instance, Regulation 7(1) mandates the delegate to give public notice of the determination, as evidenced in the document provided.
The obligations under the Regulations primarily involve Geoscience Australia, the entity proposing to install the Infrasound Station in the Vestfold Hills. Regulation 7(1) requires the delegate to publicly announce the determination of the environmental impact, ensuring transparency and allowing interested parties to access the Initial Environmental Evaluation (IEE). The delegate, in this case Dr. A.I. Fleming, must meticulously assess the potential environmental effects of the proposed activity and base the determination on the IEE. Furthermore, if the delegate determines that the impact is minor or transitory, Regulation 7(2) authorises Geoscience Australia to proceed with the activity, subject to any conditions specified by the delegate.
Breach of the obligations under the Regulations could potentially lead to various consequences. While the Regulations themselves do not explicitly enumerate offences or penalties for non-compliance, the broader framework established by the Act may apply. Under the Act, unauthorised activities in the Australian Antarctic Territory could result in enforcement actions by the Australian Antarctic Division or other relevant authorities. Additionally, non-compliance with environmental impact assessment requirements could expose Geoscience Australia to civil liabilities, including compensation for environmental harm. The potential criminal penalties for serious breaches of environmental laws in the Australian Antarctic Territory could include fines and imprisonment, as prescribed under relevant Australian legislation. However, the specific maximum penalties would be determined by the applicable laws, such as the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
In summary, the Regulations mandate the delegate of the Minister for the Environment to assess and publicly announce the environmental impact of proposed activities, authorising the proponent to proceed if the impact is minor or transitory. The obligations primarily focus on ensuring transparency and adherence to environmental standards. While the Regulations themselves do not detail specific penalties, broader environmental laws provide a framework for addressing non-compliance, including potential civil and criminal consequences.