Commonwealth of Australia
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)
Notice of call for Public Comment
Draft Threat abatement plan for infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus resulting in chytridiomycosis
The Department of the Environment is seeking written comment from interested groups and individuals on the draft Threat abatement plan for infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus resulting in chytridiomycosis.
The draft plan addresses the key threatening process ‘Infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus resulting in chytridiomycosis’ listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. It describes the research, management and other actions to reduce the impacts of chytrid fungus on native species.
The draft threat abatement plan and instructions to complete a submission are available at:
http://www.environment.gov.au/topics/biodiversity/threatened-species-ecological-communities/threat-abatement-plans/drafts-open
The three-month public comment period will close on 21 August 2014.
For further information, or to request a hard copy of the document, please email invasivespecies@environment.gov.au or phone 02 6274 1056.
Please provide your submission on the draft to:
invasivespecies@environment.gov.au
or:
The Director
Environmental Biosecurity Section
Department of the Environment
PO Box 787
Canberra ACT 2601
Overview
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) was enacted to provide for the protection of the environment, particularly matters of national environmental significance, and to establish a framework for the assessment and approval of activities that may impact these areas. This legislation was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive legal mechanism to manage and protect Australia’s biodiversity and environmental heritage, ensuring that development and other activities do not adversely affect the environment. The Act is administered by the Commonwealth Parliament and its policy objective is to balance environmental protection with economic development, allowing for sustainable use of natural resources while safeguarding ecological processes and biodiversity. The Act plays a crucial role in the protection of threatened species and ecological communities, including the development of threat abatement plans to address specific environmental threats, such as the infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus resulting in chytridiomycosis, which the draft plan currently under public review seeks to mitigate.
Scope and Application
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) applies to all individuals and entities within the Commonwealth of Australia that may have an impact on matters of national environmental significance, including the infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus. This legislation aims to protect and conserve Australia's biodiversity, ecosystems, and heritage places by identifying and mitigating threats to the environment. The Act provides a framework for the creation of threat abatement plans, such as the draft plan for chytridiomycosis, which outlines the necessary actions to address the impact of the chytrid fungus on native amphibian species. The Act's jurisdiction extends across the entire Commonwealth, and it works in conjunction with state and territory legislation to ensure comprehensive environmental protection. Notably, the Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or guidelines, which can provide further detail on specific aspects of the legislation. However, the primary focus of the Act remains the preservation and conservation of Australia's unique and diverse ecosystems.
Key Provisions
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (section 460) requires that a draft threat abatement plan for a key threatening process must be subject to public comment before it is finalised. This requirement ensures that a wide range of stakeholders, including experts, affected communities, and the public, can provide input on the proposed measures to address the threat. In this instance, the Department of the Environment is inviting submissions on the draft Threat abatement plan for infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus resulting in chytridiomycosis, which targets the impact of chytrid fungus on native amphibian species. This public consultation period lasts for three months and provides an opportunity for interested parties to review and comment on the draft plan.
Under the Act, interested parties are expected to review the draft plan and submit their feedback to the Department of the Environment by the specified deadline (section 460(4)). The submissions are crucial as they allow the department to consider a wide range of perspectives and expert opinions, which can help refine the threat abatement plan to ensure it is effective and comprehensive. Additionally, by engaging with the public and stakeholders, the department can ensure transparency and accountability in the development of the plan.
The Act imposes specific obligations on the Department of the Environment, such as preparing a draft threat abatement plan for public comment, providing clear instructions for making submissions, and ensuring that the public comment period is adequately advertised and accessible. The department is also required to consider all submissions received during the public comment period and make any necessary revisions to the draft plan before finalising it. This process is designed to ensure that the threat abatement plan is informed by a broad range of expertise and public input.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the Act can result in various consequences. While the Act itself does not specify criminal penalties for non-compliance with the public comment process, breaches of the Act's provisions can lead to legal action under other sections of the legislation. For example, if the department fails to properly consider public submissions or proceeds with a threat abatement plan that does not adequately address the threatening process, this could result in legal challenges or enforcement actions. Additionally, individuals or entities found to be deliberately providing misleading or false information during the public comment process could potentially face civil or criminal penalties under other relevant laws.