AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA AUTHORITY
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
46(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 46(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Commercial Broadcasting Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
Eastern Australia Satellite Broadcasters Pty Ltd | 1130135 | SOUTH EASTERN AUSTRALIA TV3 | SA |
Eastern Australia Satellite Broadcasters Pty Ltd | 1130136 | WESTERN ZONE TV1 | WA |
Imparja Television Pty Ltd | 2898 | REMOTE CENTRAL & EASTERN AUSTRALIA TV2 | SA |
The ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if the ACMA does not decide that sub-section 41(2) of the Act applies to the company.
The ACMA may decide that 41(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide a commercial broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether the sub-section applies, the ACMA is required by sub-section 41(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
The Act does not require the ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a commercial licence (sub-section 47(3)) should be renewed.
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted to provide a framework for the regulation of broadcasting services in Australia, addressing the need for a structured approach to licensing and the management of broadcasting services. This Act was designed to ensure that broadcasting services are provided in a manner that is consistent with the public interest, while also accommodating the evolving nature of media and communications. The Act is administered by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), which is tasked with the responsibility of overseeing the renewal of broadcasting service licences under section 46(2). The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the suitability of licensees, ensuring that they adhere to legal and regulatory standards to prevent offences and breaches of licence conditions. The ACMA's role includes assessing whether a company remains a suitable licensee based on various factors including business and personal records, and the potential risk of legal violations.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 governs the operation of commercial broadcasting services in Australia and applies to entities such as companies and individuals who provide these services. The Act specifically mandates that the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) renew broadcasting service licences unless it determines that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee, a decision based on whether the continued provision of services would lead to a significant risk of offence or licence condition breach. In making this determination, the ACMA considers the business and personal records of the company's directors and executives, including any convictions related to the Act or its regulations. The Act applies across Australia, covering both metropolitan and remote areas, as evidenced by the applications from broadcasters like Eastern Australia Satellite Broadcasters Pty Ltd and Imparja Television Pty Ltd. The Act's scope is further extended through subordinate instruments which may include specific regulations governing broadcasting content, advertising standards, and other operational aspects.
Key Provisions
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992, particularly under sections 46(2) and 41(2), lays out the procedures for the renewal of broadcasting service licenses. According to section 46(2), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is mandated to renew these licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. Suitability, as defined in section 41(2) of the Act, hinges on whether the ACMA can conclude that renewing the license would not pose a significant risk of the applicant committing an offence against the Act or its regulations, or breaching the conditions of the licence. To make this determination, the ACMA must consider the business record of the company, its record in matters requiring trust and candour, and the business and personal records of the chief executive, directors, and secretaries of the company, including any past convictions under the Act.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the ACMA and the applicants are clear. The ACMA must ensure that each applicant meets the suitability criteria as outlined in section 41(2) and must take into account various factors such as the business and personal histories of key personnel. The applicants, on the other hand, are required to provide all necessary information to the ACMA to facilitate this assessment. Importantly, the Act does not mandate an investigation or a hearing for the renewal of commercial licenses, as stated in section 47(3), streamlining the process for eligible applicants.
Breaches of the Act or its regulations, or failure to adhere to the conditions of the licence, could result in severe consequences for the licensees. While the specific provisions regarding penalties are not detailed in the provided text, the general legal framework suggests that significant breaches could lead to fines, licence suspension, or even revocation. The maximum penalties, however, would be determined based on the severity and nature of the offence, as stipulated in the broader legislative context of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 and any related regulations.