AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA AUTHORITY
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
46(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 46(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Commercial Broadcasting Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
Resonate Regional Radio Pty Limited | 10227 | ROMA RA1 | QLD |
Nova 100 Pty Ltd | 1150693 | MELBOURNE RA1 | VIC |
Northern Territory Broadcasters Pty Ltd | 10168 | DARWIN RA1 | NT |
Radio Ballarat Pty Ltd | 10284 | BALLARAT RA1 | VIC |
Radio West Coast Pty Ltd Pty Ltd | 10311 | QUEENSTOWN RA1 | TAS |
Burnie Broadcasting Service Pty Ltd | 4219 | BURNIE RA1 | TAS |
Northern Tasmania Broadcasters Pty Ltd | 4218 | DEVONPORT RA1 | TAS |
North East Tasmanian Radio Broadcasters Pty Ltd | 4223 | SCOTTSDALE RA1 | TAS |
East Coast Radio Pty Ltd | 10306 | BEGA RA1 | NSW |
West Coast Radio Pty Ltd | 10077 | MANDURAH RA1 | WA |
The ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if the ACMA does not decide that sub-section 41(2) of the Act applies to the company.
The ACMA may decide that 41(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide a commercial broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether the sub-section applies, the ACMA is required by sub-section 41(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
The Act does not require the ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a commercial licence (sub-section 47(3)) should be renewed.
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for the operation of broadcasting services in Australia. This Act was introduced to address the need for a coordinated approach to the regulation of broadcasting, ensuring that services met certain standards and adhered to national broadcasting policies. The Act was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament and its policy objective is to facilitate the provision of diverse and high-quality broadcasting services while ensuring compliance with community standards and the protection of public interest. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), established under this Act, is responsible for administering the licensing and regulatory processes, including the renewal of broadcasting service licences. The ACMA is mandated to renew these licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee, which involves assessing the applicant’s business and personal records for compliance and integrity.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to entities that seek to provide commercial broadcasting services within Australia, including companies listed for licence renewal by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). This Act mandates the ACMA to renew broadcasting service licences unless it determines that a licensee is no longer suitable, which may occur if there is a significant risk of the licensee committing an offence against the Act or breaching licence conditions. The suitability assessment considers the business and personal records of the company's executives and directors, particularly their history of compliance and trustworthiness. The Act's jurisdiction spans across various states and territories, as evidenced by the diverse range of broadcasting services seeking renewal across different regions. The Act does not mandate investigations or hearings for the renewal of commercial broadcasting licences, streamlining the process while maintaining oversight through the outlined criteria for suitability.
Key Provisions
Section 46(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act) requires the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to renew broadcasting service licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is deemed suitable if the ACMA does not conclude that subsection 41(2) applies to the company. This subsection can be invoked if the ACMA believes that allowing the company to provide or continue providing a commercial broadcasting service under a licence would create a significant risk of an offence against the Act or regulations, or a breach of the licence conditions. The ACMA's decision under subsection 41(2) is based on several factors, including the business record of the company, its record in situations requiring trust and candour, and the records of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the company, particularly in relation to trust and candour, as well as any prior convictions against the Act or regulations.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties or entities it governs are primarily centered around ensuring that broadcasting services are provided responsibly and in compliance with the Act. The ACMA must rigorously evaluate whether a company remains a suitable licensee, which involves assessing various aspects of the company's and its key personnel's records. Companies applying for licence renewal must be transparent and maintain a high standard of conduct, as any history of dishonesty, breaches of trust, or regulatory offences can jeopardise their suitability. Additionally, the Act places a responsibility on the ACMA to make informed decisions without the need for formal investigations or hearings, though it must consider the factors outlined in subsection 41(3) to determine suitability.
The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breaches within the context of licence renewals under subsection 46(2). However, the failure to meet the criteria for suitability as determined by the ACMA could result in the non-renewal of a broadcasting service licence. For other breaches of the Act, the consequences can vary. The Act provides for civil penalties for breaches, including fines up to a substantial amount as prescribed by the regulations. Criminal penalties may also apply, particularly for serious offences such as those involving the deliberate and unauthorised interception of signals, with potential penalties including imprisonment and/or hefty fines. The precise penalties are detailed in other sections of the Act and the accompanying regulations, which provide for a range of sanctions depending on the severity and nature of the breach.