NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
90(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (the ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Community Radio Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
Deepwater & Districts Community FM Radio Inc | 1150087 | DEEPWATER RA1 | NSW |
Macleay Valley Community FM Radio Station Inc | 1150061 | KEMPSEY RA2 | NSW |
Mid North Coast Christian Broadcasters Inc | 1150063 | PORT MACQUARIE RA1 | NSW |
Newcastle Christian Broadcasters Ltd | 1150030 | NEWCASTLE RA2 | NSW |
Talbragar Broadcasters Incorporated | 1170568 | DUNEDOO RA1 | NSW |
Launceston Christian Broadcasters Inc | 3986 | LAUNCESTON RA2 | TAS |
Launceston Community FM Group Inc | 3985 | LAUNCESTON RA2 | TAS |
Albury Wodonga Christian Broadcasters Inc | 1150833 | WODONGA RA1 | VIC |
Esperance Sonshine Broadcasters Inc | 10328 | ESPEREANCE RA2 | WA |
Tjuma Pulka (Media) Aboriginal Corporation | 10341 | KALGOORLIE RA2 | WA |
|
The ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if the ACMA does not decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to the company.
The ACMA may decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide either a commercial or a community broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether these sub-sections apply, the ACMA is required by sub-section 83(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) (commercial) the business record of each person who is, or would be, if a licence were allocated to the applicant, in a position to control the licence; or (community) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
Under sub-section 91(2A) of the Act, the ACMA may also refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if, having regard to matters in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f), it considers that it would not allocate such a licence if it were deciding whether to allocate the licence to the licensee.
The Act does not require the ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed (sub-section 91(3)).
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to establish a regulatory framework for the provision of broadcasting services within the country, addressing the need for a structured and supervised system that balances commercial interests with community service obligations. The Act provides the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with the authority to license and regulate broadcasters, ensuring compliance with legislative and regulatory standards to protect the public interest. The policy objective of the Act is to facilitate the provision of diverse and high-quality broadcasting services while maintaining standards of accuracy, impartiality, and respect for community values.
In line with its legislative mandate, the ACMA is responsible for assessing applications for the renewal of broadcasting service licences, ensuring that only suitable entities are permitted to operate. Under Section 90(2) of the Act, the ACMA must notify the public of licence renewal applications, providing an opportunity for interested parties to comment or object. The suitability of an applicant is determined by considering factors such as the applicant's business record, integrity, and compliance history, as well as the records of individuals in control or leadership positions within the applicant entity. The ACMA is also empowered to refuse renewal if it deems the applicant unsuitable based on criteria outlined in the Act, thereby upholding the integrity and quality of broadcasting services in Australia.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act) applies to entities that hold broadcasting service licences, including community and commercial broadcasters, and is enforced by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). The Act's jurisdiction extends to the Commonwealth and covers all states and territories in Australia. The Act provides for the regulation of broadcasting services to ensure that they comply with the standards and guidelines set out in the Act and its regulations. The ACMA is responsible for deciding whether a licence should be renewed based on the suitability of the applicant, which is determined by considering the applicant's business record, record in situations requiring trust and candour, and any relevant convictions. The Act does not require the ACMA to hold an investigation or hearing when deciding whether to renew a community broadcasting licence, but the ACMA may refuse to renew a licence if it considers that it would not allocate such a licence if it were deciding whether to allocate the licence to the licensee.
Key Provisions
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act) establishes the legal framework for the renewal of broadcasting licences. Under section 90(2), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is mandated to renew broadcasting service licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. This determination is based on various criteria, including the applicant's business record and their record in situations requiring trust and candour, as well as the business records and records of any individuals who would control the licence or who hold key positions within the applicant organisation.
In specific terms, the ACMA must consider several factors when deciding whether to renew a licence. These include the applicant's compliance history, their business practices, and whether they or any key individuals have a history of convictions under the Act or related regulations. For commercial broadcasters, the ACMA also considers the business records of individuals in control of the licence, while for community broadcasters, it focuses on the chief executive and board members. Additionally, under section 91(2A), the ACMA has the discretion to refuse renewal of a community broadcasting licence if it deems that it would not allocate the licence to the applicant under the criteria outlined in section 84(2)(a) to (f).
The obligations imposed by the Act on the ACMA are clear and specific. The ACMA must review the applications for licence renewal and determine suitability based on the criteria mentioned above. This includes assessing the business records and trust records of the applicants and any relevant individuals. The ACMA is not required to hold an investigation or a hearing for community licence renewals, as stipulated in section 91(3), but must still adhere to the criteria set out in sections 83 and 91(2A).
Breach of the provisions under the Act can lead to significant consequences. The ACMA may refuse to renew a licence if it finds that the applicant is no longer suitable, which can be a substantial setback for the broadcasting entity. For community broadcasters, refusal to renew can mean the end of their operations, as their funding and viability are closely tied to their broadcasting licence. Additionally, any convictions under the Act or related regulations can further impact an applicant's suitability, potentially leading to more severe penalties if the ACMA decides to revoke the licence or impose other sanctions. The specific consequences and penalties are not detailed in the provided excerpt, but they underscore the importance of compliance with the Act's provisions.