NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
90(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (the ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Community Radio Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
Clarence Valley Christian Broadcasters Inc | 1150059 | GRAFTON RA2 | NSW |
Lake Macquarie FM Inc | 1150043 | LAKE MACQUARIE RA1 | NSW |
8CCC Community Radio Incorporated | 10179 | ALICE SPRINGS RA2 | NT |
Dalby Broadcasting Association Inc | 1150099 | DALBY RA1 | QLD |
Geelong Ethnic Communities Council Inc | 5087 | GEELONG RA1 | VIC |
|
The ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if the ACMA does not decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to the company.
The ACMA may decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide either a commercial or a community broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether these sub-sections apply, the ACMA is required by sub-section 83(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) (commercial) the business record of each person who is, or would be, if a licence were allocated to the applicant, in a position to control the licence; or (community) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
Under sub-section 91(2A) of the Act, the ACMA may also refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if, having regard to matters in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f), it considers that it would not allocate such a licence if it were deciding whether to allocate the licence to the licensee.
The Act does not require the ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed (sub-section 91(3)).
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to regulate broadcasting services in Australia, addressing the need for a structured framework to govern both commercial and community broadcasting. The Act establishes the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) as the regulator responsible for issuing and renewing broadcasting service licences. One of its core objectives is to ensure that broadcasting services are managed in a manner that aligns with the public interest and adheres to the standards set out in the Act. The ACMA is tasked with assessing the suitability of licence applicants, ensuring they meet the criteria necessary to responsibly provide broadcasting services, thereby maintaining the integrity and quality of broadcasting in Australia.
In accordance with the Act, the ACMA has the responsibility to review and renew broadcasting service licences, ensuring that only suitable licensees continue to operate. This process includes evaluating the business and ethical records of the applicants to ascertain their capacity to comply with the Act’s provisions. The policy objective of this legislative framework is to uphold the standards of broadcasting services, ensuring they serve the public interest while preventing any potential breaches of the Act or its regulations.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to entities that provide broadcasting services within Australia, including commercial and community broadcasters. The Act governs the licensing of these services and mandates the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to ensure compliance with its provisions. The Act applies to companies that hold or seek to renew broadcasting service licences. In the context of the notice of applications for licence renewal, the ACMA evaluates whether these entities remain suitable to hold a broadcasting licence based on criteria such as their business record, trustworthiness, and compliance history. The ACMA’s authority to decide on the suitability of licensees is crucial in maintaining the integrity and regulatory standards of broadcasting services across Australia. The Act’s jurisdictional reach is national, and while it generally does not require a hearing for community broadcasting licence renewals, it provides the ACMA with the discretion to refuse renewal if certain conditions are met, ensuring that only entities meeting the required standards continue to operate.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act) related to the renewal of broadcasting service licences, as outlined in the notice, require that the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) must renew the specified broadcasting service licences (section 90(2)) unless it determines that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. The suitability of a licensee is assessed under sub-section 83(2) of the Act, which considers various factors such as the business record, the record in situations requiring trust and candour, and any previous convictions of the company or individuals associated with the company. The ACMA may refuse to renew a licence if it poses a significant risk of an offence against the Act or regulations being committed, or a breach of licence conditions occurring.
The obligations imposed on the ACMA under this Act are comprehensive and include assessing the suitability of each applicant for licence renewal. This assessment requires the ACMA to evaluate the business and ethical records of the company, its directors, and any other individuals who would control the licence. Specifically, the ACMA must consider the business record of the company, the records of individuals in positions of control or management, and any previous convictions related to the Act or regulations. Additionally, under sub-section 91(2A) of the Act, the ACMA must also consider whether it would allocate a licence to the applicant based on criteria outlined in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f). Notably, the Act does not mandate that the ACMA hold an investigation or hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed (sub-section 91(3)).
In terms of breaches and consequences, the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for failing to comply with the renewal requirements. However, the failure to appropriately assess and renew licences could potentially lead to legal challenges by the affected parties, who might argue that their rights under the Act have been infringed. Additionally, if the ACMA's decision to renew or not renew a licence is deemed to be arbitrary or without proper consideration of the statutory criteria, it could result in judicial review and further legal consequences. The ACMA's decisions must be made in accordance with the statutory guidelines, and any deviation from these guidelines could be scrutinised in a court of law.