NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
90(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (the ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Community Radio Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
Bankstown-Auburn Community Radio Inc | 3043 | BANKSTOWN RA1 | NSW |
Highland Media Co-operative Ltd | 1651 | BOWRAL RA1 | NSW |
Manly-Warringah Media Cooperative Ltd | 3049 | MANLY RA1 | NSW |
Narwee Baptist Community Broadcasters Ltd | 3050 | NARWEE RA1 | NSW |
Vision Australia Limited | 1150700 | GEELONG RA2 | VIC |
|
The ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if the ACMA does not decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to the company.
The ACMA may decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide either a commercial or a community broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether these sub-sections apply, the ACMA is required by sub-section 83(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) (commercial) the business record of each person who is, or would be, if a licence were allocated to the applicant, in a position to control the licence; or (community) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
Under sub-section 91(2A) of the Act, the ACMA may also refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if, having regard to matters in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f), it considers that it would not allocate such a licence if it were deciding whether to allocate the licence to the licensee.
The Act does not require the ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed (sub-section 91(3)).
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (BSA) was enacted to regulate the broadcasting services in Australia and ensure compliance with broadcasting standards and obligations. The Act addresses the need for a regulatory framework that promotes diversity and quality in broadcasting while protecting public interest and ensuring equitable access to broadcasting services. The BSA is administered by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), which is responsible for licensing, monitoring, and enforcing compliance with the Act. The policy objective of the BSA is to maintain a broadcasting system that is fair, efficient, and responsive to the needs of the community, including the provision of community broadcasting services. The ACMA is required to renew broadcasting service licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer suitable to hold a licence, considering factors such as the applicant’s business record, history of compliance, and any convictions under the Act.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to companies that hold broadcasting service licences, including community radio and commercial radio stations, across Australia. This Act mandates the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to renew these licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. Suitability is assessed based on the company's business and ethical record, as well as the records of key personnel involved in the control and management of the service. The ACMA may refuse to renew a licence if there is a significant risk of breaches of the Act or the regulations, or if the company or its key personnel have a history of misconduct. Notably, the Act does not mandate an investigation or hearing for the renewal of community broadcasting licences, though the ACMA can consider a wide range of factors in its decision-making process. Subordinate instruments may further detail the application and renewal process, but the primary criteria remain the suitability of the licensee based on the outlined factors.
Key Provisions
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992, specifically section 90(2), outlines the procedure for the renewal of broadcasting service licences by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). The ACMA notifies the public when applications for licence renewals are made, as seen in the notice provided for entities like Bankstown-Auburn Community Radio Inc, Highland Media Co-operative Ltd, Manly-Warringah Media Cooperative Ltd, Narwee Baptist Community Broadcasters Ltd, and Vision Australia Limited. The ACMA is obligated to renew these licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee under sub-section 83(2). To be deemed suitable, the ACMA must not find that a renewal would result in a significant risk of committing an offence against the Act or the regulations, or breaching the licence conditions.
When considering whether to renew a licence, the ACMA takes into account various factors stipulated in sub-section 83(3). These include the business record of the company, their history in situations requiring trust and candour, and the records of individuals who would control the licence or hold significant roles within the company. Additionally, any convictions against the company or relevant individuals for offences under the Act or regulations are also considered. For community broadcasting licences, the ACMA may refuse renewal if it deems that it would not allocate the licence based on criteria listed in sub-section 84(2)(a) to (f). Notably, the Act does not mandate the ACMA to conduct an investigation or hold a hearing before deciding on the renewal of a community broadcasting licence, as indicated in sub-section 91(3).
Breaches of the requirements set out in the Act can lead to significant consequences. If the ACMA determines that a licensee is unsuitable, the renewal application may be refused, and the licence may not be renewed. This decision can have serious implications for the broadcasting entities involved, potentially leading to the cessation of their services. Furthermore, any entity found to have committed an offence against the Act or the regulations, or to have breached their licence conditions, may face penalties. The maximum penalties for offences under the Act can include substantial fines and, in some cases, imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach. These consequences underscore the importance of compliance with the Act's provisions and the ACMA's criteria for determining suitability.