NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
90(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (the ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Community Radio Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
2 HHH FM Ltd | 1150154 | HORNSBY RA1 | NSW |
MVH FM Inc. | 1150174 | BOWRAL RA1 | NSW |
Radio Eastern Sydney Cooperative Ltd | 3056 | WAVERLEY RA1 | NSW |
Bay & Basin Community Resources Inc | 1150818 | SANCTUARY POINT RA1 | NSW |
Bacchus Marsh Community Radio Inc. | 1150675 | BACCHUS MARSH RA1 | VIC |
Geelong Christian Media Inc. | 1150691 | GEELONG RA1 | VIC |
South Eastern Radio Association Inc. | 5170 | MELBOURNE SOUTH EAST SUBURBS RA1 | VIC |
WYN-FM Community Radio Inc. | 1150681 | WERRIBEE RA1 | VIC |
|
The ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if the ACMA does not decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to the company.
The ACMA may decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide either a commercial or a community broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether these sub-sections apply, the ACMA is required by sub-section 83(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) (commercial) the business record of each person who is, or would be, if a licence were allocated to the applicant, in a position to control the licence; or (community) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
Under sub-section 91(2A) of the Act, the ACMA may also refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if, having regard to matters in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f), it considers that it would not allocate such a licence if it were deciding whether to allocate the licence to the licensee.
The Act does not require the ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed (sub-section 91(3)).
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the broadcasting services in the country, addressing the need for a comprehensive legal framework to govern both commercial and community broadcasting. The Act establishes the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) as the body responsible for licensing and regulating broadcasting services, ensuring that broadcasters adhere to certain standards and conditions. A key policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and quality of broadcasting services while promoting diversity and independence in the media landscape. The Act also seeks to protect the public interest by preventing the misuse of broadcasting services and ensuring compliance with legislative requirements. As part of its functions, the ACMA reviews applications for the renewal of broadcasting service licences, assessing whether the applicants remain suitable to hold such licences based on their business records, compliance history, and the likelihood of future compliance.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to entities seeking to provide or continue to provide broadcasting services within Australia, encompassing both commercial and community broadcasters. The Act mandates the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to review and decide on the renewal of broadcasting service licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee under sub-section 83(2) of the Act. A company is deemed unsuitable if there is a significant risk of an offence being committed against the Act or the regulations, or a breach of licence conditions. The ACMA considers various factors, including the business and ethical records of the company and its key personnel, in making its decision. The Act also allows the ACMA to refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if it would not initially allocate such a licence based on specified criteria. Notably, the Act does not require an investigation or hearing for the renewal of community broadcasting licences, streamlining the process under sub-section 91(3).
Key Provisions
Section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act) mandates that the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) must notify the public of applications for the renewal of broadcasting service licences, specifically community radio licences in this case. This notification informs the public that the listed companies have applied for the renewal of their licences, which are set to expire and require renewal to continue their operations. These companies include HHH FM Ltd, MVH FM Inc., Radio Eastern Sydney Cooperative Ltd, Bay & Basin Community Resources Inc, Bacchus Marsh Community Radio Inc, Geelong Christian Media Inc, South Eastern Radio Association Inc, and WYN-FM Community Radio Inc. Each of these companies holds a broadcasting service licence, which they have applied to renew, and the ACMA is required to process these applications unless it determines that any applicant is not a suitable licensee under the Act.
Under sub-section 83(2) of the Act, the ACMA is tasked with determining the suitability of a licensee for renewal based on several criteria. A company is deemed suitable if it can be shown that allowing it to provide or continue to provide a broadcasting service would not lead to a significant risk of an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed, or a breach of the licence conditions occurring. The ACMA must consider the business record of the company, its record in situations requiring trust and candour, and the records of individuals who would be in a position to control the licence or who are chief executives, directors, or secretaries of the company. Additionally, the ACMA must also consider any convictions of the company or individuals against the Act or the regulations. The ACMA's decision to renew or not renew a licence is based on these factors.
The Act outlines the potential consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. Specifically, sub-section 91(2A) of the Act allows the ACMA to refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if, considering the factors outlined in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f), it concludes that it would not allocate the licence if it were deciding whether to initially grant the licence. This provision ensures that the ACMA has a robust basis for its decisions on licence renewals. Importantly, sub-section 91(3) of the Act clarifies that the ACMA is not required to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed, streamlining the process while maintaining the authority's oversight.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 can result in various penalties. While the Act does not specify maximum penalties for breaches related to licence renewals, general provisions within the Act allow for civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. For instance, under section 139, the ACMA can impose fines up to $10,000 for each day of a breach for individuals and up to $50,000 for each day for corporations. Additionally, section 141 of the Act allows for the imposition of imprisonment for offences under the Act, with the maximum penalty varying based on the severity and nature of the offence. These provisions ensure that there are significant consequences for entities that fail to comply with the Act, reinforcing the importance of adhering to broadcasting regulations in Australia.