NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
90(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Community Radio Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
Melbourne Community Television Consortium Ltd | 1150808 | MELBOURNE TV1 | VIC |
Briz31 Limited | 1150810 | BRISBANE TV1 | QLD |
Mallee Community Broadcasters Inc | 10374 | MURRAYVILLE RA1 | VIC |
Vision Australia Limited | 10388 | SHEPPARTON RA2 | VIC |
Gladstone and District Christian Broadcasting Association Inc. | 1150050 | GLADSTONE RA1 | QLD |
Swan Hill and District Community FM Inc | 1150003 | SWAN HILL RA2 | VIC |
|
ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if ACMA does not decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to the company.
ACMA may decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide either a commercial or a community broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether these sub-sections apply, ACMA is required by sub-section 83(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) (commercial) the business record of each person who is, or would be, if a licence were allocated to the applicant, in a position to control the licence; or (community) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
Under sub-section 91(2A) of the Act, ACMA may also refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if, having regard to matters in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f), it considers that it would not allocate such a licence if it were deciding whether to allocate the licence to the licensee.
The Act does not require ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed (sub-section 91(3)).
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted to regulate the broadcasting industry in Australia, ensuring that broadcasting services are provided in a manner that is consistent with the public interest. The Act was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework that could govern both commercial and community broadcasting services. The Act is administered by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), which is responsible for licensing and monitoring compliance with the Act. The primary policy objective of the Act is to promote diversity, independence, and quality in the broadcasting services provided to the Australian public. In accordance with the Act, ACMA has received applications for the renewal of various broadcasting service licenses from different entities across the country. The renewal process requires ACMA to assess whether the applicants are still suitable to hold the licenses, considering various factors such as their business record, their record in situations requiring trust and candour, and whether they have been convicted of any offences under the Act or the regulations. ACMA may refuse to renew a community broadcasting license if it considers that it would not allocate such a license if it were deciding whether to allocate the license to the licensee.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to entities that provide broadcasting services in Australia, including commercial and community broadcasting services, as well as the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), which is responsible for regulating these services. The Act applies to entities that have been granted broadcasting service licences by ACMA and mandates the renewal of these licences as per the provisions of the Act. ACMA is responsible for deciding whether to renew these licences based on the suitability of the licensee, taking into account various factors such as the business record of the company, its record in situations requiring trust and candour, and whether it has been convicted of an offence against the Act or the regulations. The Act applies on a national level, covering all states and territories of Australia. Subordinate instruments may extend or restrict the application of the Act, but there are no stated exclusions or exemptions in this particular notice of application for licence renewal.
Key Provisions
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act) mandates that the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) must renew certain broadcasting service licences, unless it deems the applicant unsuitable. This notification from ACMA pertains to applications for the renewal of broadcasting licences by various community radio entities (sections 90(2), 83(2), 84(2)). Specifically, the Act requires ACMA to consider whether allowing the applicant to continue providing broadcasting services would result in a significant risk of committing an offence against the Act, breaching licence conditions, or other specified concerns (section 83(2)). In making this decision, ACMA must take into account the applicant's business record, their history in situations demanding trust and candour, and any relevant convictions (section 83(3)).
The obligations under the Act require ACMA to assess the suitability of the licensees based on the outlined criteria. ACMA must evaluate the business records and conduct of the entities applying for licence renewal, including any relevant individuals who control or are directors of the applicant companies. For community broadcasters, ACMA must also consider the suitability of the chief executive, directors, and secretary of the applicant. This assessment ensures that only entities with a proven track record of compliance and integrity are granted the licence to operate (section 83(2), 83(3)). Additionally, ACMA can refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if it would not have allocated the licence in the first place, considering factors such as the entity's suitability and the public interest (section 91(2A)).
Failure to comply with the requirements set forth in the Act can result in severe consequences. While the Act does not explicitly detail specific offences or penalties for non-compliance, the broader framework of the Act and related regulations may impose sanctions for breaches. ACMA has the authority to enforce compliance and may take action against entities that fail to meet the criteria for suitability, potentially leading to the revocation of the broadcasting licence. Such actions can have significant implications for the entities involved, including loss of operational capacity and reputational damage. The precise penalties or consequences would be determined in accordance with the broader legal and regulatory context in which the Act operates.
In summary, the Act provides a clear framework for ACMA to assess and decide on the renewal of broadcasting licences. It mandates a thorough evaluation of the applicant's suitability based on business records, past conduct, and other relevant factors. While the Act itself does not outline specific penalties for non-compliance, the broader legal context suggests that ACMA can take decisive action to enforce compliance, including the potential revocation of broadcasting licences. This ensures that only entities that meet the stringent criteria for suitability are permitted to continue operating within the broadcasting sector.