NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
90(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Community Radio Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
6CKI 'Voice of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands' Inc. | 1170505 | COCOS ISLANDS RA1 | WA |
University of Adelaide | 4229 | ADELAIDE RA1 | SA |
North Coast Radio Inc. | 3051 | LISMORE RA2 | NSW |
Fraser Coast Community Radio Inc. | 1150062 | HERVEY BAY RA1 | QLD |
105.5 ROXFM Inc. | 1150824 | ROXBY DOWNS RA1 | SA |
Bundy FM Community Radio Association Inc. | 1150216 | BUNDABERG RA1 | QLD |
|
ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if ACMA does not decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to the company.
ACMA may decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide either a commercial or a community broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether these sub-sections apply, ACMA is required by sub-section 83(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) (commercial) the business record of each person who is, or would be, if a licence were allocated to the applicant, in a position to control the licence; or (community) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
Under sub-section 91(2A) of the Act, ACMA may also refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if, having regard to matters in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f), it considers that it would not allocate such a licence if it were deciding whether to allocate the licence to the licensee.
The Act does not require ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed (sub-section 91(3)).
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, was established to regulate broadcasting services, ensuring that broadcasters comply with the standards and conditions set out by the Act. The Act aims to protect the public interest and provide a regulatory framework for the broadcasting industry. This notification from the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) highlights the process for the renewal of broadcasting service licences under section 90(2) of the Act. ACMA must renew these licences unless it decides that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is considered a suitable licensee if ACMA is not satisfied that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies, which would be the case if there is a significant risk of an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed, or a breach of the licence conditions occurring. ACMA may also refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if it considers that it would not allocate the licence based on the matters specified in sub-section 84(2). Importantly, the Act does not require ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed, as outlined in sub-section 91(3).
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to entities seeking to provide or continue to provide broadcasting services in Australia, including both commercial and community broadcasting. The Act governs the issuance, renewal, and revocation of broadcasting service licences, with the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) responsible for these functions. The Act applies to a range of entities, including companies and associations, and their respective licences cover various service areas across different states and territories. ACMA is required to consider the suitability of these entities to hold a licence, taking into account their business and conduct records, and whether they pose a significant risk of committing offences or breaching licence conditions. Community broadcasting licences, in particular, are subject to additional scrutiny to ensure alignment with community needs and standards. Notably, the Act does not mandate investigations or hearings for the renewal of community broadcasting licences, unless specific conditions under subsection 84(2) are met. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is nationwide, encompassing all states and territories within Australia, thereby ensuring a uniform regulatory framework for broadcasting services across the country.
Key Provisions
The notice from the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) regarding the applications for the renewal of broadcasting service licences under section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act) outlines the procedures for licence renewal. The Act mandates that ACMA will renew these licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee, as defined by subsection 83(2) of the Act. A company is deemed suitable if ACMA is not convinced that allowing the company to provide or continue to provide a broadcasting service would result in a significant risk of committing an offence against the Act or the regulations, or breaching the conditions of the licence. This assessment includes considering the company’s business record, its record in situations requiring trust and candour, and the records of individuals who would control or manage the licence.
The obligations imposed on the parties governed by the Act are substantial and multifaceted. ACMA must evaluate whether the applicant poses a significant risk of committing an offence against the Act or breaching the licence conditions. This evaluation involves a comprehensive review of the company's and relevant individuals' business records and past conduct in situations requiring trust and candour. For commercial broadcasters, ACMA must also consider the business records of individuals who would control the licence. For community broadcasters, the focus is on the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant. Additionally, any prior convictions of the company or these individuals under the Act or the regulations are taken into account. Furthermore, ACMA must consider whether it would allocate a licence to the applicant under the criteria outlined in subsections 84(2)(a) to (f) of the Act.
There are no specific offences or penalties outlined in the notice itself. However, the Act provides for various offences and penalties related to broadcasting services, including fines and imprisonment for breaches of the Act or the regulations. For instance, subsection 337(1) of the Act stipulates that an individual who commits an offence against the Act or the regulations is liable to a fine not exceeding $210,000 for a corporation. Additionally, under subsection 337(3), a corporation is liable to a fine not exceeding $1,050,000 for any offence committed under the Act. These penalties underscore the seriousness of compliance with broadcasting laws and the potential consequences for non-compliance.