NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
90(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Community Radio Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
Para Broadcasters Association Inc. | 1515 | SALISBURY RA1 | SA |
Wide Bay Christian Broadcasters Association Inc. | 1150058 | MARYBOROUGH (QLD) RA1 | QLD |
|
ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if ACMA does not decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to the company.
ACMA may decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide either a commercial or a community broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether these sub-sections apply, ACMA is required by sub-section 83(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) (commercial) the business record of each person who is, or would be, if a licence were allocated to the applicant, in a position to control the licence; or (community) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
Under sub-section 91(2A) of the Act, ACMA may also refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if, having regard to matters in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f), it considers that it would not allocate such a licence if it were deciding whether to allocate the licence to the licensee.
The Act does not require ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed (sub-section 91(3)).
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to establish a framework for the regulation of broadcasting services in Australia, aiming to address gaps in the management and oversight of broadcasting activities across commercial and community sectors. The Act provides the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) with the authority to allocate and renew broadcasting service licenses, ensuring compliance with broadcasting standards and conditions. ACMA’s role includes assessing whether a company remains a suitable licensee by evaluating factors such as business and personal records, and past compliance with broadcasting laws. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and quality of broadcasting services while promoting a diverse and competitive media environment. The legislative framework allows ACMA to refuse renewal of a licence if there is a significant risk of non-compliance or if other criteria outlined in the Act are not met.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to entities seeking to provide broadcasting services in Australia, including both commercial and community broadcasters. The Act encompasses a broad range of activities, from the operation of radio and television stations to internet-based broadcasting services. It applies across the Commonwealth of Australia, with oversight provided by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). The Act mandates that ACMA considers whether a company is a suitable licensee for broadcasting services by evaluating the company's business and conduct records, and whether there is a significant risk of legal violations or licence condition breaches. ACMA is not required to conduct an investigation or hearing when considering the renewal of a community broadcasting licence, although it may refuse renewal if it would not allocate the licence based on specific criteria. The Act also allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, though this is not specified in the gazetted notice.
Key Provisions
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act) mandates that the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) must renew broadcasting service licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. This decision hinges on whether sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to the applicant. Sub-section 83(2) applies if ACMA is satisfied that permitting the applicant to provide or continue providing a broadcasting service under a licence would result in a significant risk of an offence against the Act or regulations being committed, or a breach of licence conditions occurring. When making this determination, ACMA must consider various factors, including the applicant's business record, their history in situations requiring trust and candour, and the records of individuals who would control the licence.
The obligations under the Act require ACMA to thoroughly evaluate each application for licence renewal. This involves a careful assessment of the applicant's suitability based on their business record and personal integrity, particularly in contexts demanding trust and candour. For community broadcasters, ACMA must also consider whether the applicant meets the criteria for a community broadcasting licence under paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f) of the Act. This ensures that the licence is granted to entities that genuinely serve their community. It is important to note that ACMA is not obligated to hold an investigation or a hearing as part of the renewal process, as stipulated in sub-section 91(3) of the Act.
Breaches of the obligations set forth in the Act can lead to significant consequences. If ACMA determines that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee, it may refuse to renew their licence. This decision could result in the cessation of broadcasting services by the affected entity. Additionally, any entity found to have contravened the Act or its regulations may face legal action, including fines or other penalties as prescribed by law. The specific penalties can vary depending on the nature and severity of the offence, with potential maximum penalties outlined in relevant sections of the Act. It is imperative for broadcasters to adhere to the provisions of the Act to avoid these repercussions.