NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
90(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 90(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Community Radio Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
Hobart FM Inc. | 3082 | HOBART RA2 | TAS |
Ethnic Community Broadcasting Association of Victoria Ltd | 2492 | MELBOURNE RA1 | VIC |
Bathurst Christian Broadcasters Inc. | 10275 | BATHURST RA3 | NSW |
|
ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if ACMA does not decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to the company.
ACMA may decide that sub-section 83(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide either a commercial or a community broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether these sub-sections apply, ACMA is required by sub-section 83(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) (commercial) the business record of each person who is, or would be, if a licence were allocated to the applicant, in a position to control the licence; or (community) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
Under sub-section 91(2A) of the Act, ACMA may also refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if, having regard to matters in paragraphs 84(2)(a) to (f), it considers that it would not allocate such a licence if it were deciding whether to allocate the licence to the licensee.
The Act does not require ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a community licence should be renewed (sub-section 91(3)).
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted to regulate broadcasting services in Australia, addressing the need for a comprehensive legal framework governing the operation of broadcasting services in the country. The Act established the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to administer and enforce compliance with the Act's provisions. A key policy objective of the Act is to ensure that broadcasting services operate in a manner that promotes diversity, is of high quality, and serves the public interest. The Act was introduced to address the gap in regulatory oversight of broadcasting services, ensuring they adhere to standards that reflect the community's values and interests. The Parliament of Australia enacted this legislation to provide a robust framework for the regulation of broadcasting services, balancing the need for freedom of expression with the responsibility to protect the public from harmful or inappropriate content.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to entities that hold broadcasting service licenses in Australia, specifically encompassing commercial and community broadcasters. The Act governs the conduct of these entities, including compliance with licence conditions and prohibitions against certain activities, and it extends to the entire Commonwealth of Australia. ACMA, the regulatory body responsible for the administration of the Act, has the authority to renew broadcasting service licenses, subject to the suitability of the applicant as determined by the criteria set out in the Act. ACMA must consider the business and ethical records of the applicant and any individuals who would control the licence or hold significant positions within the organisation. Notably, the Act does not mandate ACMA to conduct investigations or hearings when deciding on the renewal of community broadcasting licenses, although it reserves the right to refuse renewal if the entity no longer meets the criteria for suitability. The Act's provisions can be further elaborated or modified through subordinate instruments, which may specify additional conditions or criteria for licence renewals and other operational aspects of broadcasting services.
Key Provisions
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act) includes a process for the renewal of broadcasting service licences. Specifically, under section 90(2) of the Act, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) must notify the public of applications for the renewal of broadcasting service licences. This includes community radio licences, which have been applied for by Hobart FM Inc. in Hobart, Ethnic Community Broadcasting Association of Victoria Ltd. in Melbourne, and Bathurst Christian Broadcasters Inc. in Bathurst. ACMA will renew these licences unless it decides that the applicant is no longer a suitable licensee, as defined in section 83(2) of the Act. This decision may be influenced by the business record of the company, its history in situations requiring trust and candour, and whether any relevant individuals have a criminal record under the Act or its regulations.
The Act requires ACMA to consider various factors when determining if an applicant is a suitable licensee. These include the business record of the company and its track record in matters requiring trust and candour. For commercial broadcasters, ACMA will also consider the business records of individuals who would control the licence. For community broadcasters, the focus is on the chief executive and directors. If ACMA believes that allowing the company to continue operating would result in a significant risk of committing an offence against the Act or breaching licence conditions, it may decide not to renew the licence. Additionally, under section 91(2A) of the Act, ACMA can refuse to renew a community broadcasting licence if it would not allocate the licence in the first place, considering the criteria outlined in section 84(2).
The Act imposes a significant obligation on ACMA to carefully evaluate each application for licence renewal. This involves assessing the suitability of the applicants based on their past conduct and compliance with broadcasting laws. ACMA must ensure that the renewal of a licence does not pose a significant risk of regulatory breaches or criminal activity. However, the Act does not mandate that ACMA hold an investigation or a hearing for community licence renewals, as stated in section 91(3). This means that the decision-making process may rely on documented evidence and submissions from the applicants rather than formal hearings.
Breaching the provisions of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 can result in various civil and criminal consequences. For example, if a licensee operates without a valid licence or violates the terms of their licence, they could face penalties. Under the Act, penalties for offences can include fines up to significant amounts as determined by the legislation, depending on the severity of the breach. Additionally, criminal charges could be brought against individuals responsible for the breach, leading to further legal consequences. The specific penalties are detailed within the Act and can vary based on the nature and extent of the violation.