AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA AUTHORITY
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE UNDER SECTION
46(2) OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICES ACT 1992
In accordance with sub-section 46(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (the Act), the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) hereby notifies that the companies listed below have lodged applications for the renewal of the following broadcasting service licences:
Commercial Radio Licensees | SL No | Service Area | State |
Votraint No. 691 Pty Ltd | 1150752 | WARRAGUL RA1 | VIC |
The ACMA is required to renew these licences unless it decides that an applicant is no longer a suitable licensee. A company is a suitable licensee if the ACMA does not decide that sub-section 41(2) of the Act applies to the company.
The ACMA may decide that 41(2) of the Act applies to a licensee if it is satisfied that allowing the licensee to provide or continue to provide a commercial broadcasting service under a licence would lead to a significant risk of: (a) an offence against the Act or the regulations being committed; (b) or a breach of the conditions of the licence occurring.
In deciding whether the sub-section applies, the ACMA is required by sub-section 41(3) of the Act, to take into account: (a) the business record of the company; and (b) the company's record in situations requiring trust and candour; and (c) the business record of the chief executive and each director and secretary of the applicant; and (d) the record in situations requiring trust and candour of each such person; and (e) whether the company, or a person referred to in paragraph (c) or (d), has been convicted of an offence against this Act or the regulations.
The Act does not require the ACMA to hold an investigation or a hearing into whether a commercial licence (sub-section 47(3)) should be renewed.
Overview
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted to establish a regulatory framework for broadcasting services in Australia, ensuring they operate within legal and community standards. This legislation was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive regulatory system that could manage the rapid evolution of broadcasting technologies and the associated challenges of maintaining public interest and standards. The Act is administered by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), which is tasked with regulating and licensing broadcasters to ensure compliance with the law. The policy objective of the Act is to facilitate the efficient and effective delivery of broadcasting services while protecting the public interest, including the promotion of diversity and the prevention of harm. The Act empowers the ACMA to renew broadcasting service licenses, provided that the licensees meet the criteria of being a suitable entity to continue operating under the terms of the licence.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to companies seeking to provide or continue to provide commercial broadcasting services in Australia, with a particular focus on the suitability of the licensees. The Act governs the operations of these companies and their ability to hold or renew broadcasting service licences, ensuring that they meet specific criteria before the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) can renew their licences. The ACMA evaluates whether a licensee remains suitable by considering various factors, including the company's business record, its history of trustworthiness and candour, the records of its directors, and any prior convictions against the company or its executives under the Act. The legislation extends its reach across the Commonwealth, affecting commercial broadcasters nationwide, and while it does not mandate investigations or hearings for licence renewals, the ACMA has the discretion to assess the suitability of each applicant based on the outlined criteria.
Key Provisions
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992, specifically section 46(2), mandates that the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) must renew broadcasting service licences unless it determines that the applicant is no longer suitable. This decision is based on whether the company meets the criteria outlined in section 41(2) of the Act. According to this section, a company is deemed unsuitable if it poses a significant risk of committing an offence against the Act or the regulations, or breaching the licence conditions. The ACMA’s assessment of suitability includes evaluating the company’s business record, its history in situations requiring trust and candour, and the personal records of the chief executive, directors, and secretaries, including their history in similar situations and any prior convictions.
The Act imposes several obligations on the ACMA when considering licence renewal applications. The ACMA must ensure that the company has a sound business record and has demonstrated integrity and reliability in past dealings. It must also scrutinise the personal records of key personnel associated with the company, verifying their conduct and any prior legal issues. These assessments are critical to determining whether the company remains a suitable entity to hold a broadcasting licence. The ACMA is not required to conduct a formal investigation or hearing as part of this process, streamlining the renewal procedure.
Failure to meet the suitability criteria outlined in the Act can lead to significant consequences for the applicant. If the ACMA decides that the company is no longer suitable, the licence renewal application may be rejected, preventing the company from continuing its broadcasting services. This decision can have severe implications for the business, potentially disrupting services and affecting stakeholders. While the Act does not explicitly detail penalties for non-suitability, the inability to renew a licence effectively bars the company from operating within the regulated broadcasting sector, which could lead to financial loss and reputational damage.
Furthermore, any breach of the conditions of the licence can also result in penalties. Although the specific penalties are not detailed in the excerpt, the Act generally allows for fines, licence suspension, or revocation. The severity of these penalties depends on the nature and extent of the breach. Companies are expected to adhere strictly to the terms of their licence to avoid these adverse outcomes. The Act's emphasis on trust, candour, and compliance underscores the importance of maintaining high standards within the broadcasting industry.