Notice of an application for the protection of a specified area, being the area known as the former Anglican Holy Trinity Church grounds, in Huskisson, New South Wales: Invitation to make representations

Administered by Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry

Legislation au C2020G00496 In force Gazette

Legislation content


Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth)

Notice of an application for the protection of a specified area, being the area known as the former Anglican Holy Trinity Church grounds, in Huskisson, New South Wales

Invitation to make representations

I, David Williams, hereby give notice as follows:

The Hon Sussan Ley MP, responsible for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth) (the Act), has received an application made under section 10 of the Act. The application is seeking long term preservation and protection of a significant Aboriginal area being the area known as the former Anglican Holy Trinity Church grounds, In Huskisson, New South Wales. The Minister has appointed me to provide a report to her under section 10(1)(c) of the Act.

The Applicant

The application is made on behalf of the Jerrinja Local Aboriginal Land Council by Mr Alfred Wellington.

The purpose of the application

The application seeks the preservation or protection of the area specified in the application and depicted below in Figure 1, from injury or desecration. Section 10 of the Act enables the Minister to decide whether to make a declaration to preserve and protect the specified area, if the Minister is satisfied that the area is a significant Aboriginal area and is under threat of injury or desecration. In the Act, the term ‘significant Aboriginal area’ refers to an area that is of particular significance to Aboriginals in accordance with Aboriginal tradition. Section 3 of the Act provides definitions of relevant terms including ‘Aboriginal tradition’ and ‘injured or desecrated’. The area specified for protection, the claimed significance of the area and the claimed nature of the threat of injury or desecration is set out below.

Matters the report is required to deal with

The Minister will consider my report under section 10 of the Act in relation to the area sought to be protected before deciding whether to make a declaration under section 10 of the Act. Under section 10(4) of the Act, the report is required to deal with the following matters:

(a)           the particular significance of the area to Aboriginals;

(b)           the nature and extent of the threat of injury to, or desecration of, the area;

(c)            the extent of the area that should be protected;

(d)           the prohibitions and restrictions to be made with respect to the area;

(e)           the effects the making of a declaration may have on the proprietary or pecuniary interests of persons other than the Aboriginal or Aboriginals on whose behalf the application is made;

(f)             the duration of any declaration;

(g)            the extent to which the area is or may be protected by or under a law of the State or Territory, and the effectiveness of any remedies available under any such law; and

(h)           such other matters (if any) as prescribed.

 

The area sought to be protected (the 'specified area')

The Applicant has specified the area for which protection is sought as a traditional area. This is the area known as the former Anglican Holy Trinity Church grounds, on Lots 7, 8, and 9 Section 3 DP 758530, in Huskisson, New South Wales.

Figure - 1 Map showing the specified area of the former Anglican Holy Trinity Church grounds, Huskisson, NSW

Claimed nature of particular significance

The Applicant states that the specified area is of particular significance in accordance with Aboriginal tradition because it is the burial place of their Ancestor in accordance with traditional custom. Other statements made by the Applicant include that:

  • the site is the burial ground of James Golding (Golden), “Budd Billy II, King of Jarvis Bay”, buried in 1905;
  • the burial and by extension the entire church site has particular significance because (rather than in spite) of this being a Christian burial in a church ground – this is highly significant given the “protectionist” policies of governments of the day which saw Aboriginal people excluded from mainstream society; and
  • there is high likelihood of other Aboriginal burials, primarily his descendants, on the site, which may be indicated by possible burial marker trees.

Claimed threat of injury or desecration

The Applicant states that the potential injury or desecration is attributed to some of the activities that Bartlett & Associates has specified in the proposed commercial and residential development. The threat is primarily attributed to the demolition of a hall, the onsite relocation of the church and the rezoning of land to allow for further development. The Applicant states that the proposed development works would injure and desecrate grave sites. The Applicant concludes that until an independent Aboriginal cultural heritage report and ground penetrating radar report are completed, it is impossible to  know that development works will not impact on the graves.

 

Invitation to make representations

Interested persons are invited to furnish representations in connection with my report to:

David Williams
Principal Consultant, Clansadale Consulting
PO Box 334 Curtin, ACT, 2605

 

Ph: 0407 430 138

Email: 31TUclansadale@iinet.net.auU31T

 

Representations must be made in writing by 5pm on Wednesday the 15PthP of July 2020 or within such further period as may be allowed. Do not send your representations directly to the Minister.

If you wish to claim confidentiality over any part of your representation, please identify why you are claiming confidentiality and how you wish confidentiality to apply.  Representations will be provided to the Minister for the Environment and the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, along with the section 10 report. Representations, even those subject to confidentiality, may be disclosed where it is authorised or required by law, to meet procedural fairness requirements, and in response to a request by a House or Committee of the Parliament of the Commonwealth.

Overview

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 was enacted to address the need for the preservation and protection of culturally significant areas to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, particularly in light of potential threats from development or other activities. The Act empowers the Minister for the Environment to make declarations to protect such areas, ensuring they are safeguarded from injury or desecration. This Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament, aiming to provide a legislative framework that recognises and protects the cultural heritage of Indigenous Australians. The policy objective of the Act is to preserve and protect areas of significance to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, ensuring these areas are respected and maintained for future generations.

Scope and Application

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth) applies to areas that are considered significant to Aboriginals in accordance with Aboriginal tradition. The Act, which operates at a Commonwealth level, empowers the Minister responsible to make a declaration for the preservation and protection of such areas if they are under threat of injury or desecration. The application of the Act is not restricted to specific persons or entities but rather focuses on the protection of culturally significant areas. The geographic reach of the Act extends across Australia, providing a national framework for the protection of Aboriginal heritage sites. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions, but the scope of protection can be influenced by subordinate instruments, which may detail specific procedural or administrative requirements. This particular application pertains to the former Anglican Holy Trinity Church grounds in Huskisson, New South Wales, and seeks to safeguard it from potential injury or desecration caused by proposed commercial and residential developments.

Key Provisions

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth) (the Act) contains several key provisions that are pertinent to the application for the protection of the former Anglican Holy Trinity Church grounds in Huskisson, New South Wales. Section 10 of the Act allows the Minister to consider an application for the preservation and protection of a significant Aboriginal area if it is under threat of injury or desecration. This process involves the Minister appointing a consultant, such as David Williams, to provide a report detailing various aspects of the application (s10(1)(c)). Section 3 of the Act includes definitions for terms such as 'significant Aboriginal area', 'Aboriginal tradition', and 'injured or desecrated', which are essential for understanding the scope and nature of the application. The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved are quite specific. The Minister, upon receiving an application, must consider the report provided by the appointed consultant. This report must address several critical matters, including the particular significance of the area to Aboriginals, the nature and extent of the threat to the area, the extent of the area that should be protected, the prohibitions and restrictions that should apply, the potential effects on proprietary or pecuniary interests of non-Aboriginal parties, the duration of any declaration, and the extent of protection already provided by state or territory laws (s10(4)). The consultant's role is to provide a thorough and comprehensive report that will inform the Minister's decision. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act can result in serious consequences. Although the Act itself does not explicitly state the penalties for breaches, general principles of Australian law apply. Offences under the Act could lead to criminal charges, and in such cases, penalties could include fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach. Civil consequences might also arise if the Act is used in conjunction with other legislation, potentially leading to lawsuits for damages resulting from injury or desecration of the protected area. It is essential for all parties involved to adhere to the Act's requirements to avoid these potential penalties and consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Indigenous Peoples & Native Title Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Rights & Protections

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.