NORTHERN TERRITORY REPRESENTATION.
No. 11 of 1949.
An Act to amend the Northern Territory Representation Act 1922–1936.
[Assented to 25th March, 1949.]
[Date of commencement, 22nd April, 1949.]
BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title and citation.
1.—(1.) This Act may be cited as the Northern Territory Representation Act 1949.
(2.) The Northern Territory Representation Act 1922–1936, as amended by this Act, may be cited as the Northern Territory Representation Act 1922–1949.
Qualifications of member for Northern Territory.
2. Section four of the Northern Territory Representation Act 1922–1936 is amended by omitting paragraph (b) and inserting in its stead the following paragraph:—
“(b) he must be a British subject.”.
Overview
The Northern Territory Representation Act 1949 was enacted to amend the existing Northern Territory Representation Act 1922–1936, addressing certain qualifications for members representing the Northern Territory. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to ensure that the qualifications of representatives are aligned with contemporary requirements and circumstances. The policy objective of this Act was to refine the eligibility criteria for the members of the Northern Territory, thereby maintaining an updated and relevant legislative framework for representation in the region. The Act commenced on 22 April 1949, following its assent on 25 March 1949.
Scope and Application
The Northern Territory Representation Act 1949 amends the earlier Northern Territory Representation Act 1922–1936 to modify the qualifications for members representing the Northern Territory. Specifically, the Act alters the requirement of British subject status by removing the phrase “he must be a British subject” and replacing it with new criteria that reflect changes in nationality laws since the original Act. The amended Act now allows for broader eligibility for those seeking to represent the Northern Territory in parliamentary matters, reflecting contemporary legal standards and practices. The Act applies to individuals who are eligible to be members of the Northern Territory's legislative assembly, thus impacting those who wish to participate in the political process of the region. This legislation has a specific jurisdictional reach, applying within the Northern Territory, governed by Commonwealth laws, while ensuring that representatives meet the updated qualifications stipulated in the Act. Any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but they are likely to be governed by the broader legislative framework and subordinate instruments that may extend or restrict the application of the Act.
Key Provisions
The Northern Territory Representation Act 1949 primarily focuses on amending the qualifications for individuals eligible to represent the Northern Territory in federal parliament. Specifically, section 2 of the Act amends section four of the Northern Territory Representation Act 1922–1936 by changing the qualification criteria for members. Under the original Act, a member needed to be a British subject (section 4(b) of the 1922–1936 Act). The 1949 Act now replaces this requirement, potentially broadening the eligibility criteria for candidates to represent the Northern Territory, though the exact new criteria are not specified in the text provided.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the 1949 Act are primarily concerned with updating the legislative framework governing the representation of the Northern Territory. While the specific new qualifications for members are not detailed in the provided text, the amendment process itself implies a requirement for clarity and precision in defining who can stand for election. It is likely that the new criteria would need to be explicitly stated in another piece of legislation or subsequent amendment to ensure that potential candidates and electoral authorities have a clear understanding of the qualifications.
In terms of legal consequences, the Act does not explicitly detail offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach within the provided text. However, any failure to comply with the updated qualifications for members could potentially lead to disqualification from candidacy or invalidation of an election result if a member is found not to meet the new criteria. The specific penalties or legal actions would depend on the precise nature of the new qualifications and any subsequent legislative clarifications or judicial interpretations.