Net Appropriation Agreement for the Attorney-General’s Department (28/06/2005)

Administered by Department of Finance

Legislation au F2005L02458 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997, Section 31
Agreements for “Net Appropriations”

 

The instrument to which this explanatory statement relates

This explanatory statement relates to an instrument (the instrument) made under section 31 of the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act), which is entitled Net Appropriation Agreement For the Attorney-General’s Department, commencing
28 June 2005.

The legislative authority under which the instrument is made

Section 31 of the FMA Act enables the Minister for Finance and Administration (the Finance Minister) to enter into agreements with other Ministers for the purposes of items in Appropriation Acts that are marked “net appropriation”. 

Section 31 of the FMA Act, together with certain standard provisions of the annual Appropriation Acts, (for example, section 10 of Appropriation Act (No.1) 2004-2005), allows departmental (and in select cases, administered) appropriation items to be increased by amounts received by an agency as specified in the agreement. 

Subsection 31(3) of the FMA Act provides that an agreement may be for any period (that is, it need not relate to a particular Appropriation Act or Acts), including a period longer than a financial year.  Generally agreements continue until circumstances require their renewal. 

Subsection 31(4) of the FMA Act enables the Finance Minister to cancel or vary an agreement at any time without the consent of the other party. 

Purpose and operation of the instrument

The instrument identifies the types of receipts which increase an existing appropriation for the Attorney-General’s Department.  The instrument is given effect by the annual appropriation Acts, which provide that the relevant departmental or administered appropriation item is increased in accordance with the agreement. This enables the receipts to be spent by the agency. 

For example, where an agency sells minor assets, such as its surplus office furniture and fittings, the amounts received from the sale will be available for expenditure by that agency. Without the agreement, any amounts received by the agency would not be available to be spent by the agency, without further appropriation by Parliament.

Notes on the instrument

Specific provisions within the annual Appropriation Acts give effect to the instrument.  Therefore, the instrument only has effect while the relevant specific provisions exist in the annual Appropriation Acts.

 

Eligible receipts covered by the instrument are set out in clause 5.1 of the instrument.


Consultation

The Attorney-General’s Department is the agency affected by this instrument. The agency was provided with drafts of the instrument before the instrument was finalised and agrees with the form of the instrument. As the instrument is for internal machinery of government purposes only, no consultation was considered necessary with other persons (see sections 17 and 18 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003).

Additional Information

Agreements made under section 31 of the FMA Act are not subject to the parliamentary disallowance and sunsetting provisions of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003:  see item 19 in subsection 44(2) and item 17 in subsection 54(2) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Overview

The Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act) was enacted to ensure sound and transparent financial management and accountability within the Australian government. This legislation was introduced to address the need for a cohesive framework governing financial practices and appropriations across various government departments and agencies. The problem it sought to resolve included the lack of a unified approach to financial accountability, transparency, and management, which could lead to inefficiencies and potential misuse of public funds. Enacted by the Australian Parliament, the Act aims to provide a structured mechanism for managing government finances effectively. The specific instrument, a Net Appropriation Agreement for the Attorney-General’s Department, was created to streamline the process of increasing departmental appropriations through certain receipts, thereby ensuring that funds received from specific activities, such as the sale of minor assets, are available for departmental expenditure without requiring additional parliamentary appropriation.

Scope and Application

The Net Appropriation Agreement for the Attorney-General’s Department, made under section 31 of the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997, specifically applies to the Attorney-General's Department, allowing it to increase its appropriation through certain specified receipts. These receipts include proceeds from the sale of minor assets, such as surplus office furniture and fittings. The agreement is effective as long as the relevant provisions are included in the annual Appropriation Acts. It enables the department to utilise these receipts without requiring additional appropriation by Parliament, thus ensuring efficient financial management within the department. The agreement can be for any duration and is not limited to a particular financial year, continuing until circumstances necessitate its renewal. The Minister for Finance and Administration has the authority to cancel or vary the agreement at any time without needing consent from the other party. This agreement is limited to internal government mechanisms and does not require consultation beyond the involved department.

Key Provisions

Section 31 of the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act) provides the Minister for Finance and Administration with the authority to enter into agreements with other ministers concerning appropriations marked as "net appropriation" in Appropriation Acts. These agreements, known as Net Appropriation Agreements, allow for the increase of departmental or, in some cases, administered appropriation items by the amounts received by an agency as specified in the agreement (section 31(1)). Importantly, these agreements are not restricted to the duration of a particular Appropriation Act or financial year and can continue until circumstances necessitate their renewal (subsection 31(3)). Additionally, the Finance Minister retains the power to cancel or modify these agreements at any time without requiring the consent of the other party (subsection 31(4)). Under the terms of the instrument, the Attorney-General’s Department is identified as the agency whose appropriation may be increased through certain receipts, as per the specific provisions of the annual Appropriation Acts. This means that any funds received from activities such as the sale of surplus office furniture and fittings will be available for expenditure by the Attorney-General’s Department without the need for further appropriation by Parliament. This arrangement is crucial for enabling agencies to manage their finances more effectively by allowing them to retain and use the proceeds from specific transactions. The obligations imposed by this legislation primarily fall on the Minister for Finance and Administration, who must ensure that agreements are properly drafted, agreed upon, and monitored. The Attorney-General’s Department, as the affected agency, must comply with the terms of the agreement and ensure that the receipts are correctly applied to the designated appropriation items. Both parties must also adhere to the provisions of the annual Appropriation Acts, which detail the specific conditions under which the receipts will increase the appropriation. There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined in the explanatory statement for breaches of the Net Appropriation Agreement. However, any failure to comply with the terms of the agreement or the annual Appropriation Acts could lead to financial mismanagement and may be subject to internal departmental review or audit. The instrument itself is not subject to the parliamentary disallowance and sunsetting provisions of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, indicating that these agreements are intended to operate with a degree of autonomy from typical legislative oversight mechanisms.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Enforcement Powers
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.