Navigation (Loading and Unloading) Regulations 1928 (Amendment)

Overview

Statutory Rules 1936 No. 126, enacted under the Navigation Act 1912-1935, addresses amendments to the Navigation (Loading and Unloading) Regulations, specifically modifying the fees associated with loading and unloading forms. This legislative instrument, issued by the Governor-General in Council, reflects a policy objective to adjust the financial obligations within maritime operations to reflect economic conditions and ensure efficient administration of maritime activities. The regulation alters the charges for specific forms used in the loading and unloading process, reducing them from three shillings to two shillings for one form, and from two shillings and sixpence to one shilling and sixpence for another form. This legislative amendment was published in the Commonwealth Gazette and authorised by the Commonwealth Government Printer in Canberra, providing a formal and transparent means of updating maritime regulations in line with the broader legislative framework.

Scope and Application

The Statutory Rules 1936 No. 126, made under the Navigation Act 1912-1935, amend the Navigation (Loading and Unloading) Regulations to adjust certain fees associated with the loading and unloading of goods on vessels. This legislative instrument applies to all persons and entities involved in the loading and unloading of goods on vessels within the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring compliance with the updated fees stipulated in the Regulations. The amendments specifically modify the monetary values of fines and fees related to loading and unloading activities, reflecting the changes from "3s." to "2s." in one instance, and from "2s. 6d." to "1s. 6d." in another. The adjustments are intended to streamline the administrative procedures and ensure the financial penalties align with contemporary economic standards. This regulation extends to all maritime activities within Australian waters and applies uniformly across the Commonwealth. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in these Regulations, and no thresholds are mentioned, indicating that the changes apply broadly to all relevant activities and participants. The application of these Regulations can be further extended or clarified through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional guidelines or interpretations as needed.

Key Provisions

The Statutory Rules 1936 No. 126, which are regulations made under the Navigation Act 1912-1935, primarily involve amendments to the Navigation (Loading and Unloading) Regulations. The operative sections (1 and 2) focus on modifying the financial footnotes within the loading and unloading regulations. Specifically, section 1 changes a notation from “3s.” to “2s.”, while section 2 revises another notation from “2s. 6d.” to “1s. 6d.” These adjustments appear to pertain to monetary figures associated with loading and unloading procedures, possibly related to fees or fines. The regulations impose specific obligations and requirements on parties involved in the loading and unloading processes. By amending the financial footnotes, the regulations ensure that the updated monetary values are applied consistently across all relevant documentation. This likely includes shipping manifests, customs forms, or other related paperwork. The accuracy and consistency of these figures are crucial for compliance with maritime regulations and for the smooth operation of maritime activities. Failure to adhere to these regulations, particularly if the updated figures are not correctly applied in relevant documentation, could lead to breaches. While the document does not specify the exact penalties or consequences for non-compliance, it is reasonable to infer that incorrect application of the amended figures could result in administrative penalties. The Navigation Act 1912-1935, from which these regulations derive their authority, likely includes provisions for fines, sanctions, or other enforcement actions to ensure adherence to maritime laws and regulations. The exact penalties would depend on the severity of the breach and the specific circumstances surrounding it.