EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES NO. 200 OF 1987
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Transport and Communications
Navigation Act 1912 - Navigation (Cargo - Hazards Prevention) Regulations (Repeal)
Subsection 253A(1) of the the Navigation Act 1912 (‘the Act’) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters necessary or convenient to be prescribed in regard to the carriage of dangerous goods in ships.
The Navigation (Cargo - Hazards Prevention) Regulations (‘the Regulations’) are made pursuant to that subsection.
Subsection 425(1) of the Act provides that the Governor-General may make regulations empowering the Minister to make orders with respect to any matter for or in relation to which provision may be made by the regulations under section 253A. Subregulation 3(1) of the Navigation (Orders) Regulations empowers the Minister to make such orders.
Marine Orders, Part 41 (Cargo and Cargo Handling - Dangerous Goods) and Marine Orders, Part 34 (Cargo and Cargo Handling - Solid Bulk Cargoes), which are expressed to come into operation on 21 September 1987, incorporate all matters dealt with in the Regulations. It is therefore necessary to repeal the Regulations.
Details of the repealing Regulations are as follows:
Regulation 1 provides that the repealing Regulations will come into operation on 21 September 1987.
Regulation 2 repeals the Regulations.
Overview
The Navigation (Cargo - Hazards Prevention) Regulations Repeal Statutory Rules 2004, issued under the authority of the Minister for Transport and Communications, were enacted to address the need for updating and consolidating the regulations pertaining to the carriage of dangerous goods in ships. The repeal of the Navigation (Cargo - Hazards Prevention) Regulations was necessitated by the introduction of new Marine Orders, specifically Part 41 (Cargo and Cargo Handling - Dangerous Goods) and Part 34 (Cargo and Cargo Handling - Solid Bulk Cargoes), which were set to come into operation on 21 September 1987. These new Marine Orders incorporated all the matters previously dealt with in the repealed regulations. The objective of this repeal, as stated in the explanatory statement, is to streamline and modernise the regulatory framework governing the navigation and safety aspects related to the carriage of hazardous materials in maritime transport, ensuring alignment with contemporary safety standards and practices.
Scope and Application
The Navigation (Cargo - Hazards Prevention) Regulations, made under the Navigation Act 1912, apply to the carriage of dangerous goods in ships within Australian waters, imposing obligations on ship owners, operators, and masters to ensure the safe carriage of such goods. These Regulations aim to prevent hazards arising from the carriage of dangerous cargo and are designed to align with the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code, thereby ensuring consistency with international standards. The Regulations' repeal and replacement with Marine Orders, Part 41 and Part 34, reflects a shift to more streamlined and integrated maritime safety standards, which came into effect on 21 September 1987. The repeal of the Regulations is intended to consolidate and simplify the legal framework governing the carriage of dangerous goods, ensuring that the provisions remain effective and up-to-date with evolving safety practices. The scope of the Act and its Regulations is limited to matters concerning the carriage of dangerous goods, excluding other maritime activities not directly related to hazardous cargo. The repeal signifies a comprehensive update to maritime safety regulations, ensuring that they are both nationally and internationally compliant.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Navigation (Cargo - Hazards Prevention) Regulations concern the repeal of these regulations as they have been incorporated into the Marine Orders, Part 41 and Part 34. Regulation 1 specifies the commencement date of the repealing regulations as 21 September 1987. Regulation 2 formally repeals the Navigation (Cargo - Hazards Prevention) Regulations in their entirety. This means that any provisions previously governed by these regulations are now to be found within the Marine Orders, thereby streamlining and consolidating the relevant legislative framework.
The obligations and requirements imposed by these regulations primarily pertain to the transition from the repealed Navigation (Cargo - Hazards Prevention) Regulations to the new Marine Orders. Parties and entities involved in the carriage of dangerous goods in ships must ensure that they are familiar with and comply with the new regulations as outlined in Marine Orders, Part 41 and Part 34. These regulations govern all necessary and convenient matters regarding the safe carriage of dangerous goods, ensuring that safety protocols and operational standards are adhered to, thus maintaining the integrity and safety of maritime transport.
The Navigation Act 1912 itself imposes a series of obligations on parties involved in maritime operations, particularly concerning the carriage of dangerous goods. These obligations include ensuring that ships comply with all safety standards, that dangerous goods are properly documented, labelled, and handled according to the regulations. Additionally, the Act mandates that ship operators and crew members are trained and knowledgeable about the handling of dangerous cargo to prevent accidents and mitigate risks. Failure to comply with these provisions can result in severe consequences.
Any breaches of the Navigation Act 1912 or the Marine Orders can result in both civil and criminal penalties. For example, violations may lead to fines and imprisonment, with the exact penalties depending on the severity of the breach. The maximum penalties are not explicitly stated in the explanatory statement but are detailed within the Act and the Marine Orders themselves. It is crucial for ship operators and crew members to adhere strictly to these regulations to avoid legal repercussions, which can include substantial financial penalties and potential imprisonment.