Statutory Rules
1973 No. 276
REGULATION UNDER THE NAVAL DEFENCE ACT 1910-1971.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL of Australia, acting with the advice of the Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1971.
Dated this eighteenth day of December, 1973.
PAUL HASLUCK
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
R. BISHOP
Minister of State for Repatriation for and on behalf of the Minister of State for Defence.
Repeal of the Naval Reserve (Sea-Going) Regulations.
Repeal.
The Naval Reserve (Sea-Going) Regulations (comprising Statutory Rules 1938, No. 58; Statutory Rules 1940, No. 122; Statutory Rules 1942, No. 26; Statutory Rules 1942, No. 205; Statutory Rules 1943, No. 116; Statutory Rules 1945, No. 126; Statutory Rules 1949, No. 58; and Statutory Rules 1965, No. 163) are repealed.
* Notified in the Australian Government Gazette on 19 December 1973.
Overview
Statutory Rules 1973 No. 276, enacted under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1971, was introduced to address the need for updated regulations governing the naval reserve, specifically concerning sea-going operations. This legislative instrument was made by the Governor-General of Australia, acting with the advice of the Executive Council, and was notified in the Australian Government Gazette on 19 December 1973. The primary objective of this regulation was to repeal the existing Naval Reserve (Sea-Going) Regulations that had been in force since 1938, consolidating and updating the rules to better align with contemporary naval defence requirements. This repeal was executed under the authority of the Minister of State for Repatriation on behalf of the Minister of State for Defence.
Scope and Application
The regulation under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1971 pertains specifically to the repeal of the Naval Reserve (Sea-Going) Regulations, which were previously established through various statutory rules over the years, including those from 1938 to 1965. This repeal indicates a significant alteration in the legislative framework governing naval reserve sea-going activities in Australia. The regulation applies to individuals and entities involved in naval reserve sea-going operations, effectively removing the previous regulatory structure that had been in place for decades. Geographically, this regulation operates within the Commonwealth of Australia, impacting federal maritime defence operations and personnel. It is important to note that this repeal does not inherently exclude or exempt any specific persons or entities from compliance with other relevant laws governing naval operations; rather, it eliminates the specified regulations, potentially subject to further directives or subordinate instruments that may extend or restrict its application.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Statutory Rules 1973 No. 276 involve the repeal of the Naval Reserve (Sea-Going) Regulations (section 1). This repeal encompasses several earlier regulations issued between 1938 and 1965, which collectively constituted the Naval Reserve (Sea-Going) Regulations. This action effectively removes the previous regulatory framework governing sea-going aspects of the Naval Reserve and replaces it with new or revised regulations that align with contemporary requirements and policies.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the entities it governs. Although the primary function of these regulations is to repeal existing ones, the overarching obligations remain consistent with the overarching Naval Defence Act 1910-1971. This includes ensuring that the Naval Reserve operates effectively and complies with any new regulations that may be introduced to replace the repealed ones. Parties involved, such as the Naval Reserve members, must adhere to the new regulatory environment, which may include updated procedures, standards, or operational guidelines.
Regarding offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the specific Statutory Rules 1973 No. 276 itself does not detail specific offences or penalties because it is primarily a repealing instrument. However, any breaches of the new regulations that replace the repealed ones would be subject to the penalties and consequences outlined in those new regulations. For instance, if the new regulations contain provisions for misconduct, failure to comply, or other breaches, the penalties could range from administrative sanctions to more severe disciplinary actions or even legal proceedings, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The maximum penalties would be specified in the new regulations that replace the repealed ones.