Statutory Rules
1980 No. 100
REGULATION UNDER THE NAVAL DEFENCE ACT 1910*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Naval Defence Act 1910.
Dated this eighth day of May1980.
ZELMAN COWEN
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
Minister of State for Administrative Services for and on behalf of the
Minister of State for Defence
AMENDMENT OF THE NAVAL FORCES REGULATIONS†
Authority to Discharge
Regulation 37 of the Naval Forces Regulations is amended by adding at the end thereof the following sub-regulation:
“ (6) The commanding officer of a naval training establishment, or the officer performing the duties of that commanding officer, is an authority for the purposes of section 30 of the Act in the case of a sailor who is undergoing training in that establishment and is discharged for the reason specified in paragraph 38 (1) (c).”.
* Notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 15 May 1980.
† Statutory Rules 1935 No. 133 as amended to date. For previous amendments see footnote † to Statutory Rules 1980 No. 7 and see also Statutory Rules 1980 No. 7.
Printed by Authority by the Commonwealth Government printer
11238/80 Cat. No. —Recommended retail price 20c 12/11.3.1980
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1980 No. 100, issued under the authority of the Naval Defence Act 1910, serves to amend the Naval Forces Regulations by adding a new sub-regulation to section 37. This legislative instrument was introduced to address a specific gap in the existing regulations concerning the authority to discharge sailors undergoing training at naval establishments. Enacted by the Governor-General, Zelman Cowen, with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, the regulation was designed to clarify the chain of command and decision-making authority regarding the discharge of sailors in training. The policy objective behind this amendment is to ensure that the commanding officer of a naval training establishment, or an officer performing those duties, has the requisite authority to discharge a sailor under the specified conditions outlined in the Act. This legislative change aims to provide clarity and streamline the process within the naval training framework.
Scope and Application
The Naval Defence Act 1910 forms the foundation of Australia's naval defence legislation, and the Statutory Rules 1980 No. 100 serve to further refine and operationalise this act by providing specific regulations that govern the conduct and operations of naval forces. These regulations pertain specifically to the personnel and operations within naval training establishments, ensuring that the overarching framework established by the Act is effectively implemented. The regulations apply to any sailor undergoing training within a naval establishment and cover the authority to discharge such personnel under specified conditions. The geographic reach of these regulations is limited to Commonwealth waters and naval installations under the jurisdiction of the Naval Defence Act, thereby extending federal legislative oversight to naval training activities. Additionally, these regulations establish a clear protocol for the commanding officer or their designate to act as an authority for discharge, which is a pivotal operational detail within the naval training context.
The specified amendment to Regulation 37 of the Naval Forces Regulations clarifies the authority of commanding officers in training establishments to discharge sailors under certain conditions, thus reinforcing the statutory framework for naval discipline and operational efficiency. The regulations do not extend their application to civilian personnel or to operations outside the scope of naval training establishments, thereby maintaining a focused legislative intent. These regulations, while specific to the context of training and discharge within naval establishments, also reinforce the overarching objectives of the Naval Defence Act by ensuring that the Navy maintains a disciplined and well-prepared force. The regulations are complemented by subordinate instruments that may further detail the procedural aspects of training and discharge, ensuring a comprehensive regulatory approach.
Key Provisions
The main operative section of this statutory instrument pertains to the amendment of Regulation 37 of the Naval Forces Regulations. Specifically, it introduces a new sub-regulation (6) which designates the commanding officer of a naval training establishment, or the officer performing the duties of that commanding officer, as an authority for the purposes of section 30 of the Naval Defence Act 1910. This applies to a sailor undergoing training in that establishment who is discharged for the reason specified in paragraph 38(1)(c) (paragraph). This means that the commanding officer or the officer performing their duties is now authorised to discharge a trainee under specific circumstances, aligning the regulatory framework with the legislative intent.
The Act imposes certain obligations on the parties it governs, primarily those within the naval training establishment. The commanding officer or the officer performing the duties of that commanding officer must ensure that any discharge of a trainee for the specified reason is conducted in accordance with the provisions of section 30 of the Act. This includes ensuring that the discharge process adheres to the legal requirements and any associated procedural standards. The obligation extends to maintaining accurate records of such discharges, which may be subject to review or audit to ensure compliance with the Act.
There are no explicit offences, penalties, or consequences for breach outlined in this particular statutory instrument. However, any failure to comply with the Act or the regulations could potentially lead to legal action under the provisions of the Naval Defence Act 1910 or other relevant legislation. Such non-compliance might result in administrative penalties, legal proceedings, or disciplinary actions against the commanding officer or the officer performing their duties. The specific consequences would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as the findings of any subsequent investigations or legal proceedings.