STATUTORY RULES.
1933. No. 99.
REGULATIONS UNDER THE NAVAL DEFENCE ACT 1910-1918.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation, under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this thirtieth day of August, 1933.
ISAAC A. ISAACS
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
G. F. PEARCE
Minister of State for Defence.
Amendment of Naval Forces Regulations.
(Statutory Rules 1926, No. 196, as amended to this date.)
(Eleventh amendment.)
Regulation 119, sub-regulation (4), is amended by omitting the word “ May ” and inserting the word “ August ” in its stead.
By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
Overview
The Naval Defence (Naval Forces) Regulations 1933, enacted as Statutory Rules 1933 No. 99, were introduced to amend existing regulations under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918. This legislative instrument was created to address specific operational needs within the Royal Australian Navy, ensuring that regulations governing naval forces remained current and effective. The regulations were enacted by the Governor-General, acting on the advice of the Federal Executive Council, reflecting the federal government's commitment to maintaining a capable and responsive naval defence force. The policy objective of these amendments was to ensure that the Navy's operational directives and procedural guidelines were aligned with contemporary requirements and practices.
Scope and Application
The Regulations under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918, as amended by Statutory Rules 1933, No. 99, apply to the amendment of Naval Forces Regulations, specifically addressing sub-regulation (4) of Regulation 119. These regulations pertain to the governance and operation of naval forces within the Commonwealth of Australia and are applicable to any person or entity involved in the naval defence activities, including personnel, vessels, and related equipment. The amendments pertain to the modification of the timing for certain naval activities, replacing the month of May with August. This alteration is intended to refine the operational schedule of naval forces under the authority of the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918. The scope of these regulations is limited to the Commonwealth of Australia, and no specific exclusions or exemptions are noted within this legislative instrument. Subordinate instruments may further extend or restrict the application of these regulations as necessary.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of these Regulations involve amendments to the Naval Forces Regulations, which were originally enacted under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918. Specifically, Regulation 119, sub-regulation (4), is amended by changing the word "May" to "August". This amendment appears to be a technical correction, potentially to align with a specific calendar date relevant to the naval operations or administrative processes (Regulation 119(4)). Such amendments are often made to ensure that the regulations remain accurate and relevant to the operational needs of the naval forces.
These Regulations impose specific obligations on the entities governed by them, primarily ensuring that the Naval Forces Regulations are correctly implemented and maintained. The change from "May" to "August" suggests a need for precise timing in naval operations, which could impact scheduling, deployment, or administrative procedures. Therefore, entities such as the Defence Force, naval command, and other relevant stakeholders must ensure that their operations comply with these corrected dates as stipulated by the Regulations (Regulation 119(4)).
Failure to adhere to the amended regulations could lead to operational inefficiencies or non-compliance with the statutory requirements set forth in the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918. While the specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the excerpt, under the general provisions of the Act, breaches of naval regulations can result in disciplinary actions against personnel, administrative penalties, or other corrective measures deemed necessary by the authorities. The precise nature of these consequences would depend on the severity of the breach and the specific context in which it occurs. However, it is clear that compliance is essential to maintain the operational effectiveness of the naval forces (Regulation 119(4)).