STATUTORY RULES.
1953. No. 19
REGULATIONS UNDER THE NAVAL DEFENCE ACT 1910-1952.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1952.
Dated this day of twenty-seventh January, 1953.
W. J. McKell
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
Minister of State for the Navy.
Amendments of Naval Forces Regulations.†
Qualifications for Instructor Branch.
1. Regulation 57 of the Naval Forces Regulations is amended by omitting sub-regulation (.3.) and inserting in its stead the following sub-regulation:—
“(3.) An applicant shall not be appointed as an Instructor Officer (†) unless he is the holder of, or qualified for admission to, a degree of a University approved by the Naval Board and has passed—
(a) if the degree was in the Faculty of Science—
(i) in the subject of mathematics at first, second and third year standards; or
(ii) in a course of study in a subject, other than mathematics, at first, second and third year standards and in the subject of mathematics at first year standard; or
(b) if the degree was in any other Faculty—in the subject of mathematics or physics at third year standard.”.
Purchase of discharge.
2. Regulation 115 of the Naval Forces Regulations is repealed.
* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on , 1953.––Thirty-seventh amendment.
† Statutory Rules 1935, No. 133, as amended by Statutory Rules 1936, Nos. 63 and 119; 1938, Nos. 20, 46, 70 and 91; 1939, Nos. 26, 27, 72 and 143; 1940; Nos. 123, 135, 147, 197, 217 and 240; 1941, Nos. 21, 187, 215 and 242; 1942, Nos. 48 and 202; 1943, No. 42; 1944, No. 63; 1946, Nos. 26 and 32; 1947, Nos. 34 and 130; 1948, Nos. 37, 87 and 88; and 1950, Nos. 4 and 26, and 1951, Nos. 53, 66 and 165.
By Authority: L. F. Johnston Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
4556.—Price 3d. 10/31.10.1952.
Overview
The Naval Defence Act 1910-1952 was enacted to ensure the protection and defence of Australia’s maritime borders and interests. The 1953 Regulations under this Act were introduced to amend certain provisions of the Naval Forces Regulations, particularly targeting the qualifications required for Instructor Officers within the Navy. The Regulations were made by the Governor-General in Council, reflecting the legislative authority of the Federal Executive Council. The policy objective behind these amendments was to enhance the professional standards and qualifications of Instructor Officers, ensuring they possessed the necessary expertise and knowledge to effectively train and instruct Navy personnel.
These 1953 Regulations sought to address specific gaps in the qualifications for Instructor Officers by introducing more stringent academic requirements. The Regulations mandated that applicants for Instructor Officer positions must hold a degree from an approved university and have passed specific courses in mathematics or physics at an advanced level. These changes were intended to elevate the calibre of instruction within the Navy, ensuring that personnel receive high-quality training from suitably qualified instructors.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1953 No. 19, Regulations Under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1952, encompass specific amendments to the Naval Forces Regulations, which apply to the operations and personnel of the Australian Naval Forces. These regulations pertain to the qualifications for Instructor Officers and the purchase of discharge. The scope of the Act applies directly to individuals employed within the Australian Naval Forces, particularly those seeking appointment as Instructor Officers. The Act outlines stringent academic qualifications, requiring applicants to hold or be qualified for admission to a degree from an approved university and to have passed specified subjects, depending on their degree focus. The Act's jurisdiction is federal, as it is made under the authority of the Naval Defence Act 1910-1952, which is a Commonwealth Act. There are no explicit exclusions or exemptions stated within these regulations, but they do refine and restrict the qualifications necessary for Instructor Officers within the Navy. The regulations also repeal previous provisions concerning the purchase of discharge, indicating a shift or simplification in the related processes.
Key Provisions
The main provisions of the Regulations under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1952 include amendments to the qualifications for Instructor Officers and the repeal of the regulation regarding the purchase of discharge. Specifically, Regulation 57 has been amended to specify the qualifications necessary for an applicant to be appointed as an Instructor Officer. This includes holding or being qualified for admission to a university degree approved by the Naval Board and passing certain academic requirements in mathematics or physics (section 1). Additionally, Regulation 115, which dealt with the purchase of discharge, has been repealed (section 2).
These Regulations impose specific educational and academic requirements on applicants for Instructor Officer positions within the naval forces. According to the amended Regulation 57, an applicant must hold or be qualified for admission to a university degree approved by the Naval Board. Furthermore, the applicant must have passed specific courses in mathematics or physics, depending on the faculty of their degree. For instance, if the degree was in the Faculty of Science, the applicant must have passed mathematics at first, second, and third-year standards or a course of study in another subject at these levels plus mathematics at first year standard. If the degree was in any other faculty, the applicant must have passed mathematics or physics at third year standard (section 1).
Failure to comply with these Regulations may lead to legal consequences. While the Regulations themselves do not explicitly outline offences or penalties, breaches of such specific requirements for Instructor Officers could result in disciplinary actions within the naval forces or other administrative penalties as deemed appropriate by the Naval Board. Additionally, the repeal of Regulation 115 removes a previously existing avenue for the purchase of discharge, potentially affecting the rights and options available to service members in certain circumstances.