Naval Forces Regulations (Amendment)

Legislation au C2004L00745 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES.

1963. No. 145.

 

REGULATIONS UNDER THE NAVAL DEFENCE ACT 1910-1952.*

I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1952.

Dated this seventeenth day of December, 1963.

DE L’ISLE

Governor-General.

By His Excellency’s Command,

(Sgd.) J. G. GORTON

Minister of State for the Navy.

 

Amendments of the Naval Forces Regulations.†

Parts.

1. Regulation 3 of the Naval Forces Regulations is amended by inserting, after the words—

“Section III.—Constitution of the Naval Board.”

the words—

“Section IIIa.—Judge Advocate General.”.

2. After regulation 20 of the Naval Forces Regulations the following Section is inserted—

Judge Advocate General for the Naval Forces.

“Section IIIa.—Judge Advocate General.

“20a.—(1.) The Governor-General may appoint—

(a) a Judge Advocate General for the Naval Forces; and

(b) a Deputy Judge Advocate General for the Naval Forces.

“(2.) A Judge Advocate General and a Deputy Judge Advocate General hold office during the pleasure of the Governor-General.

“(3.) The functions of the Judge Advocate General arc—

(a) to advise the Naval Board on such matters of law or of law and fact affecting or likely to affect the Naval Forces as arc referred to him;

(b) to consider and report to the Naval Board concerning such proceedings of a court-martial or disciplinary court as are referred to him;

 

* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 24th December, 1963.

Statutory Rules 1935, No. 133, as amended by Statutory Rules 1936, Nos. 63 and 119; 1938, Nos. 20, 40, 70 and 91; 1939, Nos. 26, 27, 72 and 143; 1940, Nos. 123, 135, 147, 197, 217 and 240; 1941, Nos. 21, 187, 215 and 242; 1942, Nos. 48 and 202; 1943, No. 42; 1944, No. 63; 1946, Nos. 26 and 32; 1947, Nos. 34 and 130; 1948, Nos. 37, 87 and 88; and 1950, Nos. 4 and 26; 1951, Nos. 53, 66 and 165; 1953, No. 19; and 1954, Nos. 28, 115 and 123; 1955, Nos. 5 and 16; 1956, No. 78; and 1958, No. 88; 1959, No. 38; and 1961, Nos., 51 and 67; and 1963, No. 113.

10467/63.—Price 3d. 9/15.11.1963.


(c) to consider and report to the Naval Board concerning such petitions against the finding or sentence, or finding and sentence, of a court-martial or disciplinary court as are referred to him;

(d) to furnish to the Naval Board such rulings and opinions on naval law as he thinks fit; and

(e) to consider and report to the Naval Board concerning such other matters affecting or likely to affect the Naval Forces as are referred to him.

“(4.) For the purposes of the last preceding sub-regulation, matters, proceedings and petitions may be referred to the Judge Advocate General by the Naval Board, by a member of the Naval Board or by a person authorized by the Naval Board so to do.

“(5.) Where the Judge Advocate General or the Deputy Judge Advocate General makes, in a report to the Naval Board, a recommendation with respect to a finding or sentence, or a finding and sentence, of a court-martial or disciplinary court, the Naval Board shall cause him to be informed of the action that it takes in relation to the finding or sentence, or finding and sentence, as the case may be.

Delegation.

“20b.—(1.) The Judge Advocate General may, either generally or otherwise as provided in the instrument of delegation, by writing under his hand, delegate to the Deputy Judge Advocate General any of the functions of the Judge Advocate General, except this power to delegation.

“(2.) A function so delegated may be exercised by the Deputy Judge Advocate General in accordance with the instrument of delegation.

“(3.) A delegation under sub-regulation (1.) of this regulation is revocable at will and does not prevent the exercise of a function by the Judge Advocate General.”.

The Schedule.

3. The Schedule to the Naval Forces Regulations is amended by inserting after item (12.) the following item:—

“(12a.) | 73 | Omit the whole section.”.

 

By Authority: A. J. Arthur, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.

Overview

The Naval Defence Act 1910-1952, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, aimed to provide for the defence of Australia by sea, including the regulation of the Australian Naval Forces. The Act was amended through the Naval Forces Regulations, which were subsequently updated over the years to reflect changes in military governance and operational requirements. The 1963 statutory rules under the Act introduced amendments to these regulations, most notably by establishing the role of the Judge Advocate General for the Naval Forces. This role was created to provide legal advice to the Naval Board and to handle various legal matters pertaining to the Navy. The amendments were made by the Governor-General in accordance with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, formalising the inclusion of legal oversight within the Naval Forces structure. This legislative instrument aimed to ensure that the Navy operated within the legal framework, providing a structured approach to the administration of justice within the Naval Forces.

Scope and Application

The Regulations under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1952, specifically Statutory Rules 1963, No. 145, extend to the governance and administration of the Australian Naval Forces, impacting both personnel and operational aspects. These Regulations are applicable to the establishment and functions of the Judge Advocate General for the Naval Forces, who is appointed by the Governor-General and holds office at the pleasure of the Governor-General. The Judge Advocate General's role includes advising the Naval Board on legal matters, reviewing court-martial proceedings, and providing rulings on naval law. The scope of the Regulations also encompasses the delegation of the Judge Advocate General’s functions to a Deputy Judge Advocate General, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the delegation instrument. These Regulations apply nationally, covering all aspects of naval legal administration within Australia, and are integral to ensuring the lawful and effective operation of the Naval Forces.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Naval Forces Regulations, as amended by the statutory instrument C2004L00745, introduce several key changes. Firstly, Section 20a of the Regulations establishes the role of the Judge Advocate General for the Naval Forces, who is appointed by the Governor-General (Section 20a(1)). This Judge Advocate General is tasked with providing legal advice to the Naval Board on matters referred to them, reviewing court-martial and disciplinary court proceedings, and considering petitions against court-martial or disciplinary court findings and sentences (Section 20a(3)). The Regulations also detail the conditions under which the Judge Advocate General may delegate their functions to the Deputy Judge Advocate General, and outline the revocability of such delegations (Section 20b). The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved, primarily the Naval Board and the appointed Judge Advocate General and Deputy Judge Advocate General. The Naval Board must ensure that the Judge Advocate General is informed of any actions taken in relation to recommendations made in their reports (Section 20a(5)). The Judge Advocate General must consider and report on matters referred by the Naval Board, a member of the Naval Board, or an authorized person, and provide opinions on naval law as deemed necessary (Section 20a(4)). The Deputy Judge Advocate General, if any functions are delegated, must exercise those functions in accordance with the delegation instrument (Section 20b(2)). For breaches of the Regulations, the statutory instrument does not explicitly state specific offences, penalties, or consequences. However, it is reasonable to infer that any non-compliance with the prescribed roles and responsibilities could lead to disciplinary actions or legal consequences under the broader Naval Defence Act 1910-1952 or other relevant legislation. The Regulations themselves do not specify maximum penalties but rather rely on the overarching legal framework to address breaches appropriately.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Military & Defence Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.