Naval Financial Regulations (Amendment)

Legislation au C1925L00039 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES

1925. No. 39.

_____________

REGULATIONS UNDER THE NAVAL DEFENCE ACT 1910-1918.

 

I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918, to come into operation forthwith.

 

Dated this twenty-fifth day of February, 1925.

FORSTER,

Governor-General.

By His Excellency’s Command,

NEVILLE HOWSE,

Minister of State for Defence.

____________

Amendment of Naval Financial Regulations.

(Statutory Rules 1924, No, 34, as amended to present date.)

1. Regulation 50 is amended by omitting from sub-regulation (8) paragraphs (f) and (g), and inserting in their stead the following paragraphs;—

s. d

(f) Sloops, also when acting as Destroyer Dépôt Ships and Surveying Ships—

When in Sea-going Commission—

(i) Warrant Officers Naval Stores—

 

 

To Engineer Officer for charge of all descriptions combined 

1

0

(ii) Gunners Naval Ordnance Stores

 

 

Naval Ordnance Torpedo Stores

 

 

Mining Stores ...........

Combined

 

 

Whitehead Torpedo Stores...

 

 

To Commissioned Gunner or Commissioned Gunner (T) or Gunner or Gunner (T)             

0

6

(iii) Warrant Officers Naval Stores, Naval Ordnance, Naval Ordnance Torpedo, Mining and Whitehead Torpedo Stores—

 

 

To Officer in charge of all descriptions of above Stores 

1

0


(g) Sloops, when not in Sea-going Commission but fully stored—

(i) Warrant Officers Naval Stores—

 

 

To Engineer Officer for charge of all descriptions combined 

0

6

(ii) Gunners Naval Ordnance Stores

 

 

Naval Ordnance Torpedo Stores

Combined

 

 

Mining Stores...........

 

 

Whitehead Torpedo Stores...

 

 

To Commissioned Gunner or Commissioned Gunner (T) or Gunner or Gunner (T)             

0

3

(iii) Warrant Officers Naval Stores, Naval Ordnance, Naval Ordnance Torpedo, Mining and Whitehead Torpedo Stores—

 

 

To Officer in charge of all descriptions of above Stores 

0

6”

2. Regulation 108 is repealed and the following regulation is inserted in its stead:—

“108. In such special cases as may be approved by the Naval Board, Officers travelling overseas on duty may receive the passage money for the class and route to which they are normally entitled and be allowed to make their own arrangements for passage. Where, in special circumstances, approval to travel by a route other than that normally allowed is given at an officer's own request, any additional expense thus incurred must be borne by such officer. In every case Shipping Company or Railway Vouchers must be produced for the full sum advanced.”

 

 

 

 

____________________

Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by H. J. Green, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1925, No. 39, were enacted under the authority of the Governor-General, with advice from the Federal Executive Council, to amend existing regulations under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918. These regulations were introduced to address the need for updated financial management within the naval defence framework, specifically concerning the allocation and oversight of naval stores and the conditions for officers' travel expenses. This legislative instrument was issued to provide more flexibility and clarity in the administration of naval resources and personnel logistics, ensuring that the operations of the naval defence forces were effectively supported and controlled. The primary objective of these regulations, as evidenced by the changes to financial oversight and travel allowances, was to enhance the efficiency and accountability of the naval defence operations. This was achieved by clearly defining the roles and responsibilities of various officers in managing naval stores and by establishing a more flexible framework for officers' travel arrangements, subject to the approval of the Naval Board. These amendments aimed to ensure that the naval defence apparatus could operate smoothly and responsively, addressing both logistical and administrative challenges faced by the naval forces during that period.

Scope and Application

The Statutory Rules 1925, No. 39, made under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918, amend and update the Naval Financial Regulations, focusing on the allocation and charge of various naval stores and the passage arrangements for officers. These regulations apply to the officers and warrant officers of the Australian Navy, specifically detailing the responsibilities and charges for different naval stores on sloops, whether they are in sea-going commission or fully stored but not in commission. Furthermore, these regulations pertain to officers travelling overseas on duty, outlining the conditions under which they can receive passage money and make their own travel arrangements, including the requirement to produce shipping or railway vouchers. The regulations have a national reach as they are enacted under the Commonwealth of Australia and extend to all naval officers and stores under the purview of the Naval Defence Act.

Key Provisions

The primary sections of these Regulations, under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918, concern the amendment of Naval Financial Regulations, specifically Regulation 50 and the introduction of a new Regulation 108 (section 1). Regulation 50, as amended, now details the allocation and supervision of various naval stores on sloops when they are in sea-going commission or fully stored but not in sea-going commission (section 1(d)). These changes include adjustments to the roles and responsibilities of warrant officers, gunners, and commissioned officers in the management of naval stores such as naval ordnance, torpedo stores, and mining stores. For example, on sloops in sea-going commission, warrant officers are to be under the charge of the Engineer Officer, while gunners are to report to a commissioned gunner or other specified officer (section 1(d)(i)). Similarly, when sloops are fully stored but not in sea-going commission, warrant officers are under the Engineer Officer's charge, and gunners are to report to a commissioned gunner or other specified officer (section 1(g)(i)). Additionally, the new Regulation 108 provides circumstances under which officers travelling overseas on duty may receive passage money and make their own travel arrangements, subject to approval by the Naval Board (section 1(e)). If an officer requests to travel by a route other than the normally allowed one, any additional expenses incurred must be borne by the officer, and shipping or railway vouchers must be produced for the full sum advanced (section 1(e)). These Regulations impose specific obligations on naval officers and warrant officers regarding the management and oversight of naval stores on sloops. For instance, when sloops are in sea-going commission or fully stored but not in sea-going commission, certain officers must be in charge of all descriptions of naval stores, as outlined in Regulation 50 (section 1(d) and (g)). Additionally, officers travelling overseas on duty must adhere to the provisions of the new Regulation 108, which includes obtaining approval from the Naval Board for their travel arrangements and bearing any additional expenses if they choose a non-standard travel route (section 1(e)). Compliance with these provisions is crucial for maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of naval operations and financial management. Breaches of these Regulations can result in various consequences, although specific penalties are not detailed in the text provided. Generally, non-compliance with regulations governing naval operations and financial management could lead to disciplinary action, administrative penalties, or other consequences as prescribed by the Naval Defence Act 1910-1918 or other relevant legislation. For instance, failure to adhere to the specified chain of command and oversight for naval stores could result in disciplinary measures against the responsible officers. Similarly, officers who do not follow the approved travel arrangements and incur additional expenses without proper authorization might face financial penalties or other administrative sanctions. The exact nature and severity of these penalties would depend on the specific circumstances of the breach and applicable laws.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Administrative Discretion

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.