Naval Financial Regulations (Amendment)

Legislation au C1969L00209 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES

1969 No. 209

 

REGULATION UNDER THE NAVAL DEFENCE ACT 1910-1968.*

I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1968.

Dated this twelfth day of December, 1969.

Paul Hasluck

Governor-General.

By His Excellencys Command,

D. J. KILLEN

Minister of State for the Navy.

 

Amendment of the Naval Financial Regulations†

Fees for witness before Service Tribunal.

Regulation 142 of the Naval Financial Regulations is amended by omitting sub-regulation (1.) and inserting in its stead the following sub-regulation:—

“(1.) A person (other than a member of the Defence Force who is rendering service) who attends to give evidence before a court-martial, disciplinary court or court of inquiry shall, in respect of that attendance, be paid such fees and travelling expenses as the Secretary to the Department thinks fit to allow in accordance with the scale in the Second Schedule to the Public Works Committee Regulations as in force from time to time under the Public Works Committee Act 1969.”.

 

* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on    1969.

† Statutory Rules 1956, No. 88, as amended to date. For previous amendments of the Naval Financial Regulations, see footnote † Statutory Rules 1969, No. 5, and see also Statutory Rules 1969, Nos. 5, 41, 55.

Printed for the Government of the Commonwealth by W. G. Murray at the Government Printing Office, Canberra.

25589/69—Price 5c        10/24.11.1969

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1969 No. 209, under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1968, were enacted to amend the Naval Financial Regulations, specifically addressing the fees and travelling expenses for witnesses attending before a court-martial, disciplinary court, or court of inquiry. This legislative instrument was introduced to address the need for updated and fair compensation for witnesses who provide their services in these judicial proceedings, ensuring that they are appropriately reimbursed for their time and travel expenses. The regulation was made by the Governor-General in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, with the intention of providing clarity and fairness in the compensation of witnesses involved in military judicial processes. The policy objective behind these amendments is to ensure that witnesses who are not members of the Defence Force and who are required to attend military tribunals are adequately compensated for their attendance, in line with the scales set out in the Second Schedule to the Public Works Committee Regulations. This amendment reflects a commitment to maintaining equitable and transparent practices within the military justice system, ensuring that individuals who contribute to these proceedings are appropriately recognised and compensated for their involvement.

Scope and Application

The 1969 Regulation under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1968 pertains specifically to amendments within the Naval Financial Regulations, particularly focusing on the fees and travelling expenses payable to persons who are not members of the Defence Force and who are required to give evidence before a court-martial, disciplinary court, or court of inquiry. This regulation applies to any individual who attends to provide testimony in such contexts, ensuring that they receive appropriate compensation for their attendance and related travel expenses, as deemed fit by the Secretary to the Department. The compensation is to be determined according to the scale outlined in the Second Schedule to the Public Works Committee Regulations as enforced by the Public Works Committee Act 1969. This regulation extends its application across the Commonwealth, aligning with the overarching jurisdiction of the Naval Defence Act 1910-1968. Notably, it does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, implying a broad application to all relevant cases within the defined scope.

Key Provisions

This regulation primarily focuses on the amendment of Regulation 142 of the Naval Financial Regulations. Specifically, it replaces the existing sub-regulation (1.) concerning fees for witnesses before service tribunals with a new sub-regulation (1.). The new sub-regulation (1.) provides that any individual, excluding Defence Force members rendering service, who attends to give evidence before a court-martial, disciplinary court, or court of inquiry, will receive fees and travel expenses as determined by the Secretary to the Department. The scale for these fees and expenses is set according to the Second Schedule to the Public Works Committee Regulations, as in force under the Public Works Committee Act 1969. Under this regulation, the Secretary to the Department has the authority to determine and allow fees and travel expenses for witnesses based on the prescribed scale. This requirement ensures that witnesses who are not Defence Force members are compensated appropriately for their time and travel related to their attendance at service tribunals. The regulation also mandates that the fees and expenses must align with the guidelines set out in the Second Schedule to the Public Works Committee Regulations, ensuring consistency and fairness in the compensation provided. The regulation imposes obligations on the Secretary to the Department to ensure that witnesses are compensated according to the prescribed scale. This includes reviewing and approving the fees and travel expenses for witnesses, as well as ensuring that these payments are made in accordance with the relevant regulations and guidelines. Additionally, the regulation requires that the fees and expenses be consistent with the standards set by the Second Schedule to the Public Works Committee Regulations, thereby maintaining a standardised approach to compensation for tribunal witnesses. Failure to comply with the provisions of this regulation could lead to legal consequences. While the regulation does not explicitly state specific offences or penalties, non-compliance with the prescribed fees and expenses scale could potentially result in civil or administrative actions. Such actions could include disputes over the accuracy and fairness of the compensation provided, as well as potential legal challenges regarding adherence to the established guidelines. The exact penalties or consequences would depend on the specific circumstances of non-compliance and the relevant legal frameworks in place at the time.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Fees for Services
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.