STATUTORY RULES.
1947 No. .
REGULATION UNDER THE NAVAL DEFENCE ACT 1910-1934.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1934.
Dated this twenty-seventh day of August , 1947.
W. J. McKell
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
Minister of State for the Navy.
Amendment of the Naval College Regulations.†
Physicaal requirements.
Regulation 12 of the Naval College Regulations is amended by omitting sub-regulation (1a.) and inserting in its stead the following sub-regulation:—
“(1a.) A candidate shall, before being accepted for entry to the College, be required to undergo a refraction test by an ophthalmic specialist.”.
* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on , 1947.—Thirteenth amendment.
† Statutory Rules 1931, No. 146, as amended by Statutory Rules 1932, No. 44; 1934, Nos. 18, 94 and 159; 1935, No. 36; 1936, Nos. 78 and 131; 1938, No. 21; 1940, No. 195; 1942, No. 25; 1944, No. 182; and 1947, No. 33.
By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
4235.—Price 3d. 8/8.1.1947.
Overview
Statutory Rules 1947 No. 12, made under the Naval Defence Act 1910-1934, was enacted to amend the Naval College Regulations with respect to physical requirements for candidates. The Governor-General, in Council, issued these regulations on 27 August 1947. The key change introduced by these regulations is the requirement for candidates to undergo a refraction test by an ophthalmic specialist before being accepted for entry to the Naval College. This amendment was designed to ensure that prospective naval officers meet specific vision standards, addressing a gap in the selection process for the Naval College. The purpose of this legislative instrument is to refine the selection criteria for entry into the Naval College, thereby ensuring that all cadets possess the necessary visual acuity to perform their duties effectively.
Scope and Application
The Naval College Regulations, as amended by the Statutory Rules of 1947 No. 121, apply to candidates seeking entry into the Naval College and are designed to ensure that prospective naval officers meet specific physical standards. These regulations are integral to the operations of the Naval Defence Act 1910-1934, which governs the naval defence of Australia. The regulations mandate that candidates undergo a refraction test by an ophthalmic specialist to meet the required physical standards for acceptance into the Naval College. The scope of these regulations is limited to the Commonwealth of Australia, as they are enacted under the authority of the Australian government. There are no explicit exclusions or exemptions stated in this particular regulation, though broader exclusions or exemptions might be detailed in other sections of the Naval Defence Act or in other regulations. The regulation's reach is confined to the physical requirements for candidates entering the Naval College, and it does not extend to other entities or industries outside of this specific context.
Key Provisions
The regulation primarily amends Regulation 12 of the Naval College Regulations by replacing the previous physical requirement (sub-regulation 1a) with a new one. Specifically, Regulation 12(1a) now stipulates that a candidate must undergo a refraction test by an ophthalmic specialist before being accepted for entry into the College. This change in the physical requirements for entry ensures that candidates meet the necessary vision standards required for their future roles in the Navy.
The parties or entities governed by this Act, particularly the candidates seeking entry into the Naval College, are now obligated to undergo a refraction test as part of the entry process. This requirement ensures that candidates have vision that meets the standards necessary for their duties, which can be critical for roles such as navigation, surveillance, and other operational tasks. Failure to comply with this new requirement could result in a candidate not being accepted into the College, thereby affecting their career aspirations within the Navy.
The regulation does not explicitly detail offences or penalties for non-compliance with the new refraction test requirement. However, given the context of the Act, non-compliance would likely result in the candidate not being accepted into the Naval College. This outcome could be seen as a significant consequence, given the competitive nature of entry into the College and the importance of meeting the physical requirements for successful completion of training and service in the Navy. There are no stated maximum penalties in the regulation, but the impact on a candidate's career prospects would be considerable.