STATUTORY RULES.
1942. No. 438.
REGULATION UNDER THE NATIONAL SECURITY ACT 1939-1940.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the National Security Act 1939-1940.
Dated this fourteenth day of October, 1942.
GOWRIE
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
H. V. EVATT
for and on behalf of the Minister of State for Defence.
Amendment of National Security (Supplementary) Regulations.†
Power of State Premiers to control sale of liquor.
Regulation 45 of the National Security (Supplementary) Regulations is amended by inserting after sub-regulation (7) the following sub-regulation:—
“(7a.) In any prosecution for a contravention of, or failure to comply with, any of the provisions of an order made under this regulation, the averment of the prosecutor that any liquor is intoxicating liquor shall be prima facie evidence of the matter averred.”.
* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 14th October, 1942.
† Statutory Rules 1940, No. 126, as amended to date. For previous National Security (Supplementary) Regulations) see footnote to Statutory Rules 1942, No. 429 and see also Statutory Rules 1942, Nos. 431 and 436.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1942 No. 438, made under the National Security Act 1939-1940, introduces amendments to the National Security (Supplementary) Regulations, specifically targeting the control of liquor sales by State Premiers during a period of national security concerns. Enacted by the Governor-General in the Federal Executive Council, these regulations aim to streamline legal proceedings related to liquor sales, ensuring that in any prosecution for a breach of liquor regulations, the prosecutor's claim that any liquor is intoxicating will be considered as sufficient evidence unless proven otherwise. This legislative instrument reflects the overarching policy objective of maintaining public order and national security during a time of crisis.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1942, No. 438 under the National Security Act 1939-1940, specifically amends the National Security (Supplementary) Regulations by introducing a new sub-regulation aimed at enhancing the efficiency of prosecutions related to the sale of intoxicating liquor. This regulation applies to the Commonwealth of Australia and is intended to support national security efforts during the period of the Second World War. The amendment addresses the burden of proof in cases where a person is prosecuted for violating an order made under the regulation by establishing that the prosecutor's statement that a particular liquor is intoxicating is considered prima facie evidence. This amendment applies to any prosecution arising from a contravention of, or failure to comply with, the provisions of an order made under the regulation, thereby providing a streamlined process to enforce national security measures related to the control of intoxicating liquor. The regulation is part of the broader legislative framework aimed at ensuring national security during a time of conflict and does not exclude any specific persons or entities from its scope.
Key Provisions
The main operative section of this legislation (Regulation 45) pertains to the amendment of the National Security (Supplementary) Regulations, specifically concerning the control of the sale of liquor by state premiers. The regulation introduces a new sub-regulation (7a), which stipulates that in any prosecution related to a contravention or non-compliance with an order made under the regulation, the prosecutor's assertion that any liquor is intoxicating will be considered prima facie evidence of the claim. This means that unless there is evidence to the contrary, the court will accept the prosecutor's statement as true without needing further proof.
The obligations and requirements imposed by this regulation are primarily directed towards state premiers and law enforcement agencies. State premiers are tasked with exercising control over the sale of liquor in a manner that aligns with the broader national security objectives outlined in the National Security Act 1939-1940. This includes ensuring that any orders they make regarding the sale of liquor are adhered to and that appropriate measures are taken to enforce these orders. Law enforcement agencies, on the other hand, are required to act on these orders and to prosecute any breaches. The new sub-regulation (7a) places an additional burden on prosecutors to ensure that they present clear and convincing evidence that any liquor involved in a prosecution is indeed intoxicating, as this will be accepted as true unless disproven.
Under this regulation, any breaches of the provisions concerning the sale of liquor could lead to both civil and criminal consequences. For instance, state premiers who fail to enforce the orders they make could face legal action for non-compliance. Similarly, individuals or entities that contravene the orders could be prosecuted under the amended regulation. The specific penalties for such offences are not detailed in the legislation provided but typically would include fines and/or imprisonment, as stipulated under the broader framework of the National Security Act 1939-1940. The introduction of prima facie evidence in sub-regulation (7a) is designed to streamline prosecutions and ensure that the legal process is efficient and effective in addressing violations related to the sale of intoxicating liquor.