National Health (Weighted average disclosed price - main disclosure cycle) Amendment Determination 2012 (No. PB 6 of 2012)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2012L00649 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

INSTRUMENT NUMBER PB 6 OF 2012

 

NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953

 

National Health (Weighted average disclosed price – main disclosure cycle) Amendment Determination 2012

 

Authority

 

This legislative instrument is made pursuant to subsection 99ADB(4) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act), which provides that the Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine the weighted average disclosed price (WADP) of a brand of a pharmaceutical item (listed brand) in accordance with the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960 (the Regulations).

 

Subsection 99ADB(7) of the Act further provides that a subsection 99ADB(4) determination for a listed brand may include the adjusted approved ex-manufacturer price (AAEMP) and the adjusted approved price to pharmacists (AAPTP) for the listed brand.

 

Purpose

 

This legislative instrument amends the National Health (Weighted average disclosed price – main disclosure cycle) Determination 2011 (PB 80 of 2011) (the Principal Instrument), which is made pursuant to subsection 99ADB(4) and paragraph 99ADH(1)(aa) of the Act and makes certain determinations relating to price disclosure for listed brands in the main disclosure cycle with a data collection period ending 30 September 2011.

 

The purpose of this amending instrument is to add listed brands that were listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) after the Principal Instrument was made but prior to the reduction day of 1 April 2012, and which have been allocated to the main disclosure cycle by regulation 37F of the Regulations (new listed brands). Brands which are no longer listed on the PBS, and a brand of an exempt item, are also removed.

 

The amending instrument also reflects the outcome of the administrative price disclosure dispute resolution process by determining a fresh WADP, AAEMP, and AAPTP for listed brands with the listed drug ‘Clozapine’ and an ‘oral’ manner of administration.

 

Only a responsible person for a listed brand appearing in Schedule 1 of the Principal Instrument will receive a price disclosure reduction on and from 1 April 2012, provided that, on that date, the ‘approved price to pharmacists’ for the listed brand is more than the determined ‘AAPTP’ for that brand.

 

New listed brands

The new listed brands listed on the PBS on either 1 January 2012 or 1 March 2012.

 

Each entry for a new listed brand, except for those with the listed drug Tacrolimus, is inserted into Schedule 1 of the Principal Instrument because these listed brands have an unadjusted price reduction that has been calculated to be at least 10%.

 

Entries for listed brands with the listed drug Tacrolimus are inserted into Schedule 2 of the Principal Instrument. These listed brands have an unadjusted price reduction that has been calculated to be less than 10%. Paragraph 99ADH(1)(c) of the Act provides that no price disclosure price reduction will be applied to these brands on 1 April 2012.

 

Exempt item

Price disclosure does not apply to listed brands of section 84AH exempt items. A new exempt item was created on 1 March 2012, so the amending instrument removes from PB 80 of 2011 the listed brand ‘Somac’ with the form ‘Sachet containing granules 40mg (as sodium sesquihydrate)’.

 

Clozapine oral

A dispute was lodged with the Department in relation to the WADP determined in the Principal Instrument for listed brands with the drug ‘Clozapine’ and an ‘oral’ manner of administration.

 

The Department, in conjunction with Australian Healthcare Associates Pty Ltd (AHA), known as the Price Disclosure Data Administrator (PDDA), and in accordance with the administrative dispute resolution process, conducted a review. As an outcome of the review, new data was received which resulted in new WADP calculations. The calculations were performed by the PDDA and were quality assured by Pitcher Partners, an independent audit and advisory firm.

 

A new determined WADP, AAEMP and AAPTP for these listed brands is inserted into the Principal Instrument, and into Schedule 1 of the Principal Instrument because the listed brands have an unadjusted price reduction that has been calculated to be at least 10%.

 

Consultation

 

This instrument affects pharmaceutical companies with medicines listed on the PBS. Pharmaceutical companies have been consulted in relation to the introduction of price disclosure requirements during both the policy development and implementation of the further PBS reforms of 2010. This has occurred through meetings with both peak body organisations and individual companies. Information on the price disclosure measure has been disseminated through peak industry bodies, during regular meetings with the Price Disclosure Working Group and direct to responsible persons through information sessions and educational workshops.

 

Responsible persons with a listed brand that is new to the PBS 1 January 2012 or
1 March 2012 have been informed of the reductions for those brands.

 

Responsible persons for all listed brands with the listed drug ‘Clozapine’ and an ‘oral’ manner of administration were consulted throughout the application of the administrative price disclosure dispute resolution process and have been informed of the reduction for those brands.

 

This instrument commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

This instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The National Health (Weighted average disclosed price – main disclosure cycle) Amendment Determination 2012 (PB 6 of 2012) was enacted to amend the National Health (Weighted average disclosed price – main disclosure cycle) Determination 2011, addressing the gaps in the disclosure of pharmaceutical prices for certain brands listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This legislative instrument was made under the authority of subsection 99ADB(4) of the National Health Act 1953, allowing the Minister to determine the weighted average disclosed price (WADP) of pharmaceutical brands. The primary objective of this amendment is to update the price disclosure requirements to reflect the addition of new brands listed on the PBS after the original determination but before the reduction day of 1 April 2012, while also removing brands that are no longer listed on the PBS or are exempt items. The amendment incorporates the results of the administrative price disclosure dispute resolution process, ensuring that the WADP, adjusted approved ex-manufacturer price (AAEMP), and adjusted approved price to pharmacists (AAPTP) for specific brands, such as those containing the drug Clozapine, are accurately reflected in the determination.

Scope and Application

The National Health (Weighted Average Disclosed Price – Main Disclosure Cycle) Amendment Determination 2012 applies to responsible persons of listed brands under the National Health Act 1953, particularly those pharmaceutical brands listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) that have undergone specific price adjustments. The instrument specifically targets pharmaceutical companies with medicines listed on the PBS and ensures compliance with the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960. It applies to new listed brands that were added to the PBS on 1 January 2012 or 1 March 2012 and have been allocated to the main disclosure cycle. Additionally, it determines fresh weighted average disclosed prices, adjusted approved ex-manufacturer prices, and adjusted approved prices to pharmacists for brands with the listed drug ‘Clozapine’ and an ‘oral’ manner of administration, following an administrative dispute resolution process. The instrument excludes brands of section 84AH exempt items, such as the newly exempt item ‘Somac’ with the form ‘Sachet containing granules 40mg (as sodium sesquihydrate)’, from price disclosure requirements. This amendment operates on a national level, affecting all responsible persons across Australia.

Key Provisions

The National Health (Weighted Average Disclosed Price – Main Disclosure Cycle) Amendment Determination 2012 (F2012L00649) amends the 2011 determination to include new pharmaceutical brands listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) before 1 April 2012, and to exclude brands that are no longer listed or are exempt items (subsection 99ADB(4) and paragraph 99ADH(1)(aa) of the National Health Act 1953). This legislative instrument also revises the weighted average disclosed price (WADP), adjusted approved ex-manufacturer price (AAEMP), and adjusted approved price to pharmacists (AAPTP) for listed brands with the listed drug 'Clozapine' and an 'oral' manner of administration, reflecting the outcome of an administrative dispute resolution process. These new determinations are inserted into Schedule 1 of the 2011 determination, except for brands with the listed drug Tacrolimus, which are inserted into Schedule 2, as they do not qualify for a price disclosure reduction (paragraph 99ADH(1)(c) of the Act). Responsible persons for listed brands are subject to certain obligations under this amending instrument. For brands listed on the PBS on or after 1 January 2012, a price disclosure reduction will apply from 1 April 2012, provided the 'approved price to pharmacists' for the brand exceeds the determined 'AAPTP'. Brands listed on the PBS on 1 March 2012 are also subject to this reduction, except for those with the listed drug Tacrolimus, which have a calculated unadjusted price reduction of less than 10% and will not receive a price disclosure reduction. For listed brands with the listed drug 'Clozapine' and an 'oral' manner of administration, the amending instrument determines a new WADP, AAEMP, and AAPTP. These new values replace the previously determined ones, reflecting the outcome of the administrative dispute resolution process. Failure to comply with the provisions of this amending instrument may result in legal consequences. However, the explanatory statement does not specify any offences, penalties, or civil or criminal consequences for breach. The Act and the Regulations provide the framework for enforcement and sanctions, which may include fines or other penalties as determined by the relevant authorities. The amending instrument itself does not outline specific penalties, but it is subject to the broader legal framework provided by the National Health Act 1953 and the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.