EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by Authority of the Minister for Health
NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953
NATIONAL HEALTH (REMOTE ABORIGINAL HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAM) SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AMENDMENT INSTRUMENT 2012 (NO. 1)
INSTRUMENT NUMBER PB 52 of 2012
Authority
Subsection 100(1) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act) enables the Minister to make special arrangements for the supply of pharmaceutical benefits. Subsection 100(2) of the Act provides that the Minister may vary or revoke a special arrangement made under subsection 100(1).
Subsection 100(3) of the Act provides that Part VII of the Act, and instruments made for the purposes of Part VII of the Act, have effect subject to a special arrangement made under subsection 100(1).
Purpose
The purpose of this legislative instrument, made under subsections 100(1) and 100(2) of the Act, is to amend the National Health (Remote Aboriginal Health Services Program) Special Arrangements Instrument 2010 (PB 65 of 2010) (the Special Arrangement). This Special Arrangement provides for the supply to remote Aboriginal Health Services (AHS) of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) medicines.
This instrument increases the handling fee that is payable to an approved pharmacist or an approved hospital authority in respect of the supply of a pharmaceutical benefit to an approved Aboriginal Health Service in accordance with the Special Arrangement.
On and from 1 July 2012, the handling fee is increasing from $2.79 to $2.82. The handling fee is indexed annually (WCI9) with the increase provided through the Fifth Community Pharmacy Agreement.
Consultations
The amendment is minor and machinery in nature. Consultation took place with the Department of Human Services.
The legislative instrument commences on 1 July 2012.
This Instrument is a legislative instrument for the purpose of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Overview
The National Health (Remote Aboriginal Health Services Program) Special Arrangements Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 1) was enacted to amend the existing arrangements under the National Health Act 1953, specifically concerning the supply of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) medicines to remote Aboriginal Health Services (AHS). This legislative instrument was introduced to address the need for minor adjustments to the handling fees payable to approved pharmacists or hospital authorities, which are involved in supplying these medications to approved AHS. Enacted by the Minister for Health, this instrument operates under the authority granted by subsection 100(1) of the National Health Act 1953, which allows for the establishment of special arrangements for the supply of pharmaceutical benefits, and subsection 100(2), which enables the Minister to vary or revoke these arrangements. The policy objective behind this amendment is to ensure that the handling fees are adequately indexed, reflecting changes such as those stipulated in the Fifth Community Pharmacy Agreement, thereby maintaining the financial sustainability of the program. The amendment reflects a commitment to adjusting the fee structure to accommodate inflationary changes and other economic factors, while ensuring that the essential services provided to remote Aboriginal Health Services remain accessible and affordable.
Scope and Application
The National Health (Remote Aboriginal Health Services Program) Special Arrangements Amendment Instrument 2012 (No. 1) amends the National Health (Remote Aboriginal Health Services Program) Special Arrangements Instrument 2010, which governs the supply of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) medicines to remote Aboriginal Health Services (AHS). This legislative instrument applies to approved pharmacists and hospital authorities involved in supplying these medicines under the special arrangement. The amendment specifically affects the handling fee payable to these entities, increasing it from $2.79 to $2.82, effective from 1 July 2012. The Act and its subordinate instruments apply at the Commonwealth level, affecting transactions nationwide. The amendment is minor and primarily of a machinery nature, as confirmed through consultation with the Department of Human Services. This instrument, being a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, does not specify exclusions or exemptions beyond the scope of its purpose to adjust the handling fee within the existing framework.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation are subsections 100(1), 100(2), and 100(3) of the National Health Act 1953. Subsection 100(1) empowers the Minister to create special arrangements for the supply of pharmaceutical benefits, while subsection 100(2) allows the Minister to alter or rescind these arrangements. Subsection 100(3) ensures that Part VII of the Act, as well as any instruments made for the purposes of Part VII, operates in accordance with any special arrangements established under subsection 100(1). The legislation amends the National Health (Remote Aboriginal Health Services Program) Special Arrangements Instrument 2010, specifically increasing the handling fee for the supply of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) medicines to remote Aboriginal Health Services (AHS) from $2.79 to $2.82, effective from 1 July 2012.
The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act pertain to approved pharmacists and hospital authorities who are responsible for supplying pharmaceutical benefits to approved Aboriginal Health Services. These entities must adhere to the special arrangement outlined in the legislation, which now includes the increased handling fee. Furthermore, the handling fee is subject to annual indexing, as stipulated by the Fifth Community Pharmacy Agreement. The Act requires these entities to adjust their billing practices to reflect the new fee, ensuring compliance with the legislative changes.
In terms of consequences for non-compliance, the Act does not explicitly detail specific offences, penalties, or civil or criminal consequences for breach. However, failure to comply with the special arrangements and the revised handling fee could potentially lead to disputes, financial discrepancies, or administrative issues. While the Act does not outline maximum penalties, it is likely that any breaches could be subject to administrative action or other legal recourse under the overarching provisions of the National Health Act 1953 or related regulations. The minor nature of the amendment suggests that the focus is more on procedural adjustments rather than punitive measures.