National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations (Amendment)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F1996B02865 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES

1968 No.

 

REGULATION UNDER THE NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953-1967*

I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the National Health Act 1953-1967.

Dated this fourth day of July, 1968.

CASEY

Governor-General.

By His Excellency’s Command,

(SGD.) A. J. FORBES

Minister of State for Health.

 

Amendments of the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations†

Repeat authorizations.

Regulation 26 of the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations is amended—

(a) by inserting before the word “prepare” in paragraph (a) of sub-regulation (1.) the words “upon or before supplying the pharmaceutical benefit,”;

(b) by adding at the end of paragraph (f) of sub-regulation (1.) the words “at the time the pharmaceutical benefit is supplied”;

(c) by adding at the end of sub-regulation (1.) the words—

“Penalty: Twenty dollars.”; and

(d) by omitting sub-regulations (2.) and (3.) and inserting in their stead the following sub-regulation:—

“(2.) An approved pharmaceutical chemist is not authorized to supply a pharmaceutical benefit upon presentation of the duplicate of a prescription unless—

(a) there is surrendered to him a repeat authorization duly related to the duplicate prescription by a number or numbers and indicating that the pharmaceutical benefit to be supplied has not been supplied for the number of times directed in the prescription;

(b) he writes his name on the repeat authorization;

(c) any numbered authority for the prescription issued under regulation 13 or regulation 14 of these Regulations is produced to him or, if the prescription does not authorize any further supply of the pharmaceutical benefit, is surrendered to him; and

* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 1968.

† Statutory Rules 1960, No. 17, as amended by Statutory Rules 1960, Nos. 90 and 102; 1961, Nos. 59 and 137; 1962, Nos. 34, 101 and 114; 1963, Nos. 34, 69 and 107; 1964, Nos. 12, 57 and 135; 1965, Nos. 51, 151 and 152; and 1966, Nos. 80 and 144.

3543/67—Price 5c 9/20.5.1968


(d) the date appearing on the duplicate as the date on which the prescription was written is a date not more than six months before the presentation of the duplicate.”.

 

By Authority: A. J. Arthur, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1968 No. REGULATION UNDER THE NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953-1967 was enacted to amend the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations. This legislative instrument was introduced to address procedural issues related to the supply of pharmaceutical benefits under the National Health Act. Enacted by the Governor-General with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, this regulation aimed to enhance the regulatory framework surrounding the provision of repeat pharmaceutical prescriptions, ensuring clarity and accountability in the process. The policy objective was to streamline the administrative requirements for repeat prescriptions while maintaining stringent controls to prevent misuse.

Scope and Application

The Statutory Rules 1968 No. REGULATION UNDER THE NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953-1967 pertains specifically to the amendment of the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations. This legislation applies to pharmaceutical chemists and entities that supply pharmaceutical benefits under the authority of the National Health Act 1953-1967, particularly focusing on the supply of pharmaceutical benefits through prescriptions. The regulation impacts the conduct of these entities by detailing the requirements for the supply of pharmaceutical benefits, including the necessity for repeat authorisations and the conditions under which these authorisations must be presented and processed. The regulation applies across the Commonwealth of Australia, aligning with the jurisdictional reach of the National Health Act. Exclusions or exemptions from these regulations are not explicitly stated in this particular legislative instrument, but they may be defined in other sections of the National Health Act or related legislation. The regulation extends its application through subordinate instruments, allowing for further specification and detailed guidelines to be provided in subsequent amendments or regulations.

Key Provisions

The statutory rules introduced under the National Health Act 1953-1967 include significant amendments to the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations. Specifically, Regulation 26 is revised to ensure that approved pharmaceutical chemists adhere to stricter guidelines when supplying pharmaceutical benefits. Under these amendments, Regulation 26(1)(a) now mandates that a pharmacist must prepare the pharmaceutical benefit before supplying it, and Regulation 26(1)(f) requires the pharmacist to affix their name to the repeat authorization at the time the pharmaceutical benefit is supplied. Additionally, the penalty for non-compliance is set at twenty dollars, as stated in the regulation (Regulation 26(1)). Sub-regulations (2) and (3) have been replaced with a new sub-regulation (2) that specifies conditions for supplying pharmaceutical benefits using a duplicate prescription. This includes the requirement for a repeat authorization related to the duplicate prescription by a number or numbers, the pharmacist's signature on the repeat authorization, and the production or surrender of any numbered authority for the prescription issued under regulation 13 or 14 of these Regulations (Regulation 26(2)). The obligations imposed by these regulations on approved pharmaceutical chemists are stringent and clearly defined. Pharmacists must ensure that they prepare the pharmaceutical benefit before supplying it, which emphasizes the need for careful preparation and verification of the medication. They are also required to write their name on the repeat authorization at the time of supplying the pharmaceutical benefit, ensuring accountability and traceability. Furthermore, pharmacists must ensure that they either produce or surrender any numbered authority for the prescription, thereby maintaining compliance with the regulations regarding the prescription's validity and the number of times it can be used. The requirement to verify that the date on the duplicate prescription is not more than six months prior to the presentation ensures that prescriptions remain current and safe for use. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in civil penalties, specifically a fine of twenty dollars as outlined in the regulations (Regulation 26(1)). This penalty serves as a deterrent against non-compliance and reinforces the importance of adhering to the stipulated procedures. The civil nature of the penalty indicates that the primary focus is on ensuring corrective action rather than punitive measures. Nonetheless, repeated or willful non-compliance could lead to further scrutiny or additional consequences under broader health regulations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Penalty Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.