National Health (Pharmaceutical benefits – early supply) Amendment Instrument 2021 (No. 11)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2021L01651 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953

NATIONAL HEALTH (PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS – EARLY SUPPLY) AMENDMENT INSTRUMENT 2021 (No. 11)

PB 119 of 2021

 

Purpose

The purpose of this legislative instrument, made under subsection 84AAA(2) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act) is to amend the National Health (Pharmaceutical benefits—early supply) Instrument 2015 (PB 120 of 2015) (the Principal Instrument).

PB 120 of 2015 specifies the pharmaceutical items that are in pharmaceutical benefits for which Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) safety net entitlements will not apply for early supplies, and to specify the period following previous supply.

The amendments made by this Instrument reflect amendments to the National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Instrument 2012 (PB 71 of 2012), which commence on the same day.  The National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Instrument 2012 (PB 71 of 2012) is made under sections 84AF, 84AK, 85, 85A, 88 and 101 of the Act.

Authority

Subsection 84AAA(1) of the Act provides that a supply of a pharmaceutical benefit (whether or not the supply is of a kind described in paragraph 84C(4A)(a) of the Act) to a person is an early supply of a specified pharmaceutical benefit if:

(a)           The pharmaceutical item in the pharmaceutical benefit is specified in an instrument under subsection 84AAA(2); and

(b)           the supply is made within 20 days after the day of a previous supply to the person of:

(i)       the same pharmaceutical benefit; or

(ii)     another pharmaceutical benefit that has the same pharmaceutical item as the pharmaceutical benefit; or

(iii)   another pharmaceutical benefit that is Schedule equivalent to the pharmaceutical benefit; and

(c)           the supply does not result from a prescription originating from a hospital.

Subsection 84AAA(2) of the Act provides that the Minister may specify, by legislative instrument, pharmaceutical items for the purposes of paragraph 84AAA(1)(b) of the Act.

Subsection 84AAA(3) provides that the instrument may specify a pharmaceutical item by reference to the circumstances in which a pharmaceutical benefit that has the pharmaceutical item is supplied or any other circumstances in relation to a pharmaceutical benefit that has the pharmaceutical item.

Paragraph 84C(4A) of the Act refers to repatriation pharmaceutical benefits supplied under the schemes established under section 91 of the Veterans Entitlements Act 1986 or section 18 of the Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests (Treatment) Act 2006 or supplied in accordance with a determination made under paragraph 256(1)(c) of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004.

Subsection 101(3AA) of the Act requires the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) to make recommendations to the Minister about what should be specified in the instrument under subsection 84AAA(2).

Changes to PB 120 of 2015 made by this instrument

Schedule 1 to this instrument provides for the addition of the listed drugs lanadelumab, and ripretinib, the addition of a form of the listed drug ribavirin, and the addition of a maximum number of repeats for the listed drug venetoclax. It also provides for the deletion of the listed drug dalteparin, and the deletion of a maximum quantity for the drug mesalazine, for the list of pharmaceutical benefits for which PBS safety net entitlements will not apply for early supplies. These changes are summarised by subject matter in the Attachment.

Variation and revocation

Unless there is an express power to revoke or vary PB 120 of 2015 cited in this Instrument and explanatory statement, subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is relied upon to revoke or vary PB 120 of 2015.

Consultation

The involvement of PBAC constitutes a formal and ongoing process of consultation.  The PBAC is the independent expert body, established by section 100A of the Act, which makes recommendations to the Minister about which drugs and medicinal preparations should be available to Australians as pharmaceutical benefits.  PBAC members are selected from consumers, health economists, practising community pharmacists, general practitioners, clinical pharmacologists and specialists, with at least one member selected from each of those interests or professions.  The Committee also includes a pharmaceutical industry nominee.  Remaining members are persons whom the Minister is satisfied have qualifications and experience in a field relevant to the functions of the PBAC, and that would enable them to contribute meaningfully to the deliberations of the Committee.  The PBAC has provided advice regarding what should be specified in this Instrument.

This amendment is minor and machinery in nature.

General

A provision-by-provision description of this Instrument is contained in the Attachment.

This Instrument commences on 1 December 2021.

This Instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003.


ATTACHMENT

PROVISION-BY-PROVISION DESCRIPTION OF NATIONAL HEALTH (PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS – EARLY SUPPLY) AMENDMENT INSTRUMENT 2021 (No. 11)

Section 1 Name of Instrument

This section provides that the Instrument is the National Health (Pharmaceutical benefitsearly supply) Amendment Instrument 2021 (No. 11) and may also be cited as PB 119 of 2021.

Section 2 Commencement

This section provides that the Instrument commences on 1 December 2021.

Section 3 Authority

This section states that this Instrument is made under subsection 84AAA(2) of the
National Health Act 1953

Section 4 Schedules

Section 4 provides that each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to the Instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to the Instrument has effect according to its terms.

Schedule 1 Amendments

The amendments in Schedule 1 make changes to the list of pharmaceutical benefits for which PBS safety net entitlements will not apply for early supplies. These changes add and delete listed drugs, add a form of a listed drug, add a maximum number of repeats for a listed drug, and delete a maximum quantity or number of units of a listed drug. These changes are summarised below.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO THE NATIONAL HEALTH (PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS—EARLY SUPPLY) INSTRUMENT 2015 MADE BY THIS INSTRUMENT

Listed Drugs Added

Listed Drug

Lanadelumab

Ripretinib

Listed Drug Deleted

Listed Drug

Dalteparin

Form Added

Listed Drug

Form

Ribavirin

Tablet 200 mg

 


Deletion of Maximum Quantity or Number of Units Form

Listed Drug

Form

Maximum quantity or number of units

Mesalazine

Sachet containing prolonged release granules, 1 g per sachet

120

Addition of Maximum Number of Repeats

Listed Drug

Form

Maximum number of Repeats

Venetoclax

Tablet 100 mg

2


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

National Health (Pharmaceutical benefits – early supply) Amendment Instrument 2021 (No. 11)

(PB 119 of 2021)

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny)
Act 2011.

Overview of the Instrument

The National Health (Pharmaceutical benefits – early supply) Amendment Instrument 2021 (No. 10) amends the National Health (Pharmaceutical benefits—early supply) Instrument 2015 which specifies the pharmaceutical items that are pharmaceutical benefits for which the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) Safety Net entitlements will not apply for early supplies.

Human rights implications

The right to social security is contained in Article 9 of the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). It requires that a country must, within its maximum available resources, ensure access to a social security scheme that provides a minimum essential level of benefits to all individuals and families that will enable them to acquire at least essential health care. Countries are obliged to demonstrate that every effort has been made to use all resources that are at their disposal in an effort to satisfy, as a matter of priority, this minimum obligation.

The PBS is a benefit scheme which assists with advancement of this human right by providing for subsidised access by patients to medicines.  The recommendatory role of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) ensures that decisions about subsidised access to medicines on the PBS are evidence-based.  The pharmaceutical industry now has a nominee on the PBAC membership.

Whether there is any detriment to patients by the delisting of these drugs, and if so, how this is compatible with the right to social security

The UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights reports that there is a strong presumption that retrogressive measures taken in relation to the right to social security are prohibited under ICESCR. In this context, a retrogressive measure would be one taken without adequate justification that had the effect of reducing existing levels of social security benefits, or of denying benefits to persons or groups previously entitled to them. However, it is legitimate for a Government to re-direct its limited resources in ways that it considers to be more effective at meeting the general health needs of all society, particularly the needs of the more disadvantaged members of society.

When a sponsor submits a request to delist a drug from the PBS, subsection 101(4AAB) of the National Health Act 1953 requires that the Minister or their delegate obtain advice from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), an independent and expert advisory body, before varying or revoking declarations under subsection 85(2) so as to delist the drug. In these instances, one of the matters which the PBAC provides advice on is whether the delisting of a drug will result in an unmet clinical need for patients. PBAC also considers whether the delisting of a form of a drug will result in an unmet clinical need for patients.

Written advice from PBAC is tabled with the monthly amendments to the National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Instrument 2012. An unmet clinical need would arise when a currently treated patient population would be left without treatment options once a delisting occurs. Alternative treatment options could include using a different: form, strength or drug. The PBAC considered the delisting of drugs and the form of drugs in the abovementioned instruments, would not result in an unmet clinical need. The delisting of these items will not affect access to the drugs, as affected patients will be able to access alternative medicines through the PBS and the delisting is unlikely to have an effect on the amount patients pay for those drugs, as co-payment amounts are capped, ensuring their rights to social security are maintained.

Sponsors are private entities that make their own decisions regarding their products and cannot be compelled by the Government to continue to list a product on the PBS. If there are many brands of a listed drug and form, then the delisting of one brand will not adversely affect members of the public as they will be able to obtain any of the other equivalent brands. However, if the final brand of a form of a drug is delisted, this delisting will be considered by PBAC. This includes additional processes to ensure that where a delisting will result in there being only one brand of that form remaining listed on the PBS, that patients will not be negatively affected by having to pay brand premiums. Note that delisting of maximum quantities, number of repeats, and pack sizes are equivalent to brand delistings.

Patients accessing PBS subsidised medicines are usually required to pay a co-payment towards their cost. From 1 January 2021, these fees are up to $41.30 for general patients and up to $6.60 for concession card holders. These co-payments are payable for accessing all PBS subsidised medicines. The delisting of the drugs specified below is therefore unlikely to result in a negative financial impact for patients. This is due to the same maximum co-payments applying to all PBS listed medicines.

Considerations for drugs being delisted in this instrument

Dalteparin

The sponsor requested the delisting of all strengths of dalteparin injections from the PBS. The PBAC noted there was low utilisation of these items and that there were suitable alternatives available. The PBAC advised that the delisting of dalteparin would not result in an unmet clinical need.

 

Conclusion

This Instrument is compatible with human rights because it advances the protection of human rights.

 

 

 

Nikolai Tsyganov

Assistant Secretary (Acting)

Pricing and PBS Policy Branch

Technology Assessment and Access Division

Department of Health

 

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.