EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
National Health Act 1953
National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2019 (No. 9)
PB 99 of 2019
Authority
This legislative instrument is made pursuant to subsection 99ADB(6B) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act).
Purpose
This legislative instrument amends the National Health (Originator Brand) Determination 2015 (PB 100 of 2015) (the Principal Instrument) to determine the originator brand of a pharmaceutical item for one drug new to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) F2 formulary on 1 December 2019.
The Principal Instrument determines originator brands of pharmaceutical items that have a drug on the F2 formulary. On meeting certain criteria, drugs move from the F1 formulary (see s 85AB of the Act), or the single brand Combination Drug List (CDL), to F2. All drugs on F2 are subject to price disclosure. This instrument is necessary to implement removal of originator brand data from price disclosure calculations (originator removal) in certain circumstances as set out in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 2017 (the Regulations). Originator removal will potentially increase price disclosure related price reductions because originator brands tend to maintain higher prices than other brands.
Amendments
An originator brand determination is set out in Schedule 1 of this amending instrument for one drug that is moving from F1 to F2 (sevelamer) on 1 December 2019. Subsection 99ADB(6C) of the Act provides that when deciding whether to determine originator brands the Minister (or delegate) must have regard to whether the brand was on F1 or CDL when it was first determined as a brand of pharmaceutical item under subsection 85(6) of the Act.
The main criteria used to determine these brands as originators were that they were the listed brands of the drug when it was on F1 or CDL.
Basis for amendments
Subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is relied upon to vary or revoke the determination made under subsection 99ADB(6B) for the medicines affected by this amending instrument.
Consultation
The company with a PBS listed brand of the drug for which an originator brand has been determined was asked for comments in relation to the potential originator brand determination. No comments were received.
This instrument commences on 1 December 2019.
This instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2019 (No. 9) (PB 99 of 2019)
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the Legislative Instrument
This legislative instrument amends the National Health (Originator Brand) Determination 2015 (PB 100 of 2015) (the Principal Instrument) to determine the originator brand of a pharmaceutical item for one drug new to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) F2 formulary on 1 December 2019.
The instrument is necessary to implement removal of originator brand data for price disclosure calculations (originator removal) in certain circumstances as set out in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 2017 (the Regulations). Originator removal will potentially increase PBS price reductions as originator brands tend to maintain higher prices than other brands. Originator removal means that the Government price would more closely reflect the prices at which generic brands of the medicine are being sold in the market, not the prices of all brands.
The PBS provides Australians with timely, reliable and affordable access to necessary and
cost-effective medicines. The PBS operates under Part VII of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act) which regulates the listing, prescribing, pricing, charging and payment of subsidies for supply of drugs and medicinal preparations as pharmaceutical benefits. The Regulations prescribe matters and set out details in relation to the operation of the PBS.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument is compatible with Articles 2 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by assisting with the progressive realisation by all appropriate means of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.
The PBS assists with advancement of this human right by providing subsidised access to medicines for Australians.
Originator removal will improve the operation of the PBS by delivering better value for money for PBS medicines through price reductions. This will assist consumers by reducing out-of-pocket costs for some PBS medicines.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it advances the protection of human rights.
Thea Daniel
Assistant Secretary
Pricing and PBS Policy Branch
Technology Assessment and Access Division
Department of Health
Overview
The National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2019 (No. 9) amends the National Health (Originator Brand) Determination 2015 to determine the originator brand of a pharmaceutical item for the drug sevelamer, which is new to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) F2 formulary on 1 December 2019. This amendment is made pursuant to subsection 99ADB(6B) of the National Health Act 1953 and is necessary to implement the removal of originator brand data from price disclosure calculations, as outlined in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 2017. This change is expected to result in increased price reductions within the PBS, as originator brands typically maintain higher prices than generic brands. The amendment is intended to ensure the PBS continues to provide timely, reliable, and affordable access to necessary and cost-effective medicines by enhancing value for money through better pricing mechanisms. The determination of originator brands is based on the criteria that the brand was listed on the F1 formulary or the Combination Drug List when it was first recognised under the Act. This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights, particularly the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, by facilitating more affordable access to essential medicines through the PBS.
Scope and Application
The National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2019 (No. 9) is a legislative instrument made under the National Health Act 1953, which governs the operation of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This instrument amends the National Health (Originator Brand) Determination 2015 to determine the originator brand of a specific pharmaceutical item, sevelamer, for the purposes of PBS pricing and subsidies. It applies to the pharmaceutical industry, particularly entities that manufacture and supply sevelamer or similar drugs listed under the F2 formulary, which are subject to price disclosure. The determination is crucial for the implementation of originator removal, a policy under the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 2017, where originator brand data is excluded from price disclosure calculations. This change is expected to lead to lower prices and thus reduce out-of-pocket expenses for consumers. The Act and its regulations have a national reach, applying across Australia, and this amendment applies specifically to the drug sevelamer as it transitions from the F1 formulary to the F2 formulary on 1 December 2019. There are no specific exclusions or exemptions noted in the determination, but the application of the originator removal policy is contingent on meeting the criteria set out in the Regulations. The instrument is compatible with human rights as it aims to enhance access to affordable and cost-effective medicines under the PBS.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2019 (No. 9) (F2019L01512) pertain to the amendment of the National Health (Originator Brand) Determination 2015. Specifically, section 2(1) of this amending instrument determines the originator brand for a pharmaceutical item concerning the drug sevelamer, which transitions from the F1 formulary to the F2 formulary of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) on 1 December 2019. This amendment aligns with subsection 99ADB(6B) of the National Health Act 1953 and is based on the criteria outlined in subsection 99ADB(6C) of the Act, which considers whether the brand was on F1 or the Combination Drug List (CDL) when it was first determined as a brand of pharmaceutical item under subsection 85(6) of the Act. The amendment is set out in Schedule 1 of the instrument.
The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act primarily involve the determination of the originator brand of a pharmaceutical item, specifically for the drug sevelamer as it moves from the F1 formulary to the F2 formulary. The Act mandates that the determination be made based on whether the brand was listed when it was first identified as a pharmaceutical item under the relevant subsections of the Act. Additionally, the Act requires that the determination be consistent with the criteria established under the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 2017, particularly concerning the originator removal for price disclosure calculations. This ensures that the pricing of the drug reflects the prices at which generic brands are sold, rather than the higher prices typically maintained by originator brands.
The legislation also outlines consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. While the specific penalties for breaches are not detailed in the explanatory statement, it is implied that non-compliance with the Act could lead to legal repercussions. Such consequences might include administrative actions, fines, or other penalties as prescribed by the relevant laws governing the PBS and the National Health Act 1953. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, and could potentially involve civil or criminal liabilities as stipulated by the applicable regulatory frameworks. It is crucial for entities and parties governed by this Act to adhere to the determinations and requirements set forth to avoid any adverse outcomes.