National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2016 (No. 5) (PB 71 of 2016)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2016L01245 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

 

National Health Act 1953

 

National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2016 (No. 5) PB 71 of 2016

 

Authority

This legislative instrument is made pursuant to subsection 99ADB(6B) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act).

Purpose

This legislative instrument amends the National Health (Originator Brand) Determination 2015 (PB 100 of 2015) (the Principal Instrument) to:

  • determine the originator brand of a pharmaceutical item for three drugs new to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) F2 formulary on 1 August 2016;
  • determine the originator brand of a pharmaceutical item of an existing F2 formulary drug on 1 August 2016 because of the application of a 16% Statutory Price Reduction (SPR) for a different manner of administration.

The Principal Instrument determined originator brands of pharmaceutical items that have a drug on the F2 formulary.  On meeting certain criteria drugs move from the F1 formulary (see s 85AB of the Act), or the single brand Combination Drug List (CDL), to F2.  All drugs on F2 are subject to price disclosure.  The instrument is necessary to implement removal of originator brand data from price disclosure calculations in certain circumstances as set out in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960 (the Regulations).  Removal of originator data will potentially increase price disclosure related price reductions because originator brands tend to maintain higher prices than other brands.

Amendments

An originator brand determination is set out in Schedule 1 of this amending instrument for three drugs that are moving from F1 to F2 (atomoxetine, follitropin alfa and tobramycin) and for an existing F2 listed drug (morphine) because of a first new brand listing for a previously single branded manner of administration.

Subsection 99ADB(6C) of the Act provides that when deciding whether to determine originator brands the Minister (or delegate) must have regard to whether the brand was on F1 or CDL when it was first determined as a brand of pharmaceutical item under subsection 85(6) of the Act.  This would be brands that were PBS listed brands of pharmaceutical item while the drug was on F1 or the CDL, before its move to F2.

The main criteria used to decide to determine these brands as originators were that they were the listed brand(s) of the drug when it was on F1, or in the case of the drug already on F2 (morphine), the first brand for the injection manner of administration.

Basis for amendments

Subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is relied upon to vary or revoke the determination made under subsection 99ADB(6B) for the medicines affected by this amending instrument.

Consultation

The companies with a PBS listed brand of the drug for which an originator brand has been determined were asked for comments in relation to the potential originator brand determination.  No comment was received.

This instrument commences on 1 August 2016. This instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003.


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2016 (No. 5)

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

This legislative instrument amends the National Health (Originator Brand) Determination 2015 (PB 100 of 2015) (the Principal Instrument) to determine an originator brand of a pharmaceutical item for three drugs new to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) F2 formulary and for an existing F2 listed drug (morphine) because of a first new brand listing for a previously single branded manner of administration.

The instrument is necessary to implement removal of originator brand data for price disclosure calculations in certain circumstances as set out in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960 (the Regulations).  The removal of originator brand data during price disclosure calculations will potentially increase PBS price reductions as originator brands tend to maintain higher prices than other brands.  Removal of originator brand data means that the Government price would more closely reflect the prices at which generic brands of the medicine are being sold in the market, not the prices of all brands.

The PBS provides Australians with timely, reliable and affordable access to necessary and
cost-effective medicines.  The PBS operates under Part VII of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act) which regulates the listing, prescribing, pricing, charging and payment of subsidies for supply of drugs and medicinal preparations as pharmaceutical benefits.  The Regulations prescribe matters and set out details in relation to the operation of the PBS.

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument is compatible with Articles 2 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by assisting with the progressive realisation by all appropriate means of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

The PBS assists with advancement of this human right by providing subsidised access to medicines for Australians.

The removal of the originator brand disclosed data from price disclosure calculations will improve the operation of the PBS by delivering better value for money for PBS medicines through price reductions.  This will assist consumers by reducing out-of-pocket costs for some PBS medicines.

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it advances the protection of human rights.

 

Dianna Prosser

Assistant Secretary (Acting), Pharmaceutical Evaluation Branch,

Pharmaceutical Benefits Division

Department of Health

 

Overview

The National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2016 (No. 5) was enacted in 2016 to address the issue of determining the originator brand of certain pharmaceutical items listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) F2 formulary, and to implement the removal of originator brand data from price disclosure calculations under the National Health Act 1953. This amendment was made pursuant to subsection 99ADB(6B) of the Act and was introduced by the Minister for Health or their delegate. The policy objective of this instrument is to ensure that the PBS provides Australians with timely, reliable, and affordable access to necessary and cost-effective medicines. By amending the National Health (Originator Brand) Determination 2015, the instrument specifies the originator brand of three new F2 formulary drugs and an existing F2 listed drug, potentially increasing price disclosure-related price reductions and delivering better value for money for PBS medicines through price reductions, which in turn reduces out-of-pocket costs for some PBS medicines.

Scope and Application

The National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2016 (No. 5) amends the National Health (Originator Brand) Determination 2015 to determine the originator brand of specific pharmaceutical items for the purposes of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) under the National Health Act 1953. This amendment applies to three drugs new to the PBS F2 formulary (atomoxetine, follitropin alfa, and tobramycin) and an existing F2 listed drug (morphine) due to a new brand listing for a previously single branded manner of administration. The determination of originator brands is essential for implementing the removal of originator brand data from price disclosure calculations, as outlined in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960. By excluding originator brand data, the Government aims to reflect market prices more accurately, potentially leading to increased price reductions for PBS medicines and lower out-of-pocket costs for consumers. This amendment operates nationally under the Commonwealth jurisdiction and is effective from 1 August 2016.

Key Provisions

The key provisions of the National Health (Originator Brand) Amendment Determination 2016 (No. 5) focus on determining the originator brand of pharmaceutical items for specific drugs on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) F2 formulary (sections 1 and 2). This determination is crucial for the implementation of price disclosure calculations as stipulated in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960. The amendment aims to potentially increase PBS price reductions by removing originator brand data from the calculations, which generally results in higher prices compared to other brands. This is particularly relevant for drugs transitioning from F1 or Combination Drug List (CDL) to F2, as outlined in section 85AB of the National Health Act 1953. The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Firstly, it mandates the Minister or a delegate to determine the originator brand of pharmaceutical items based on specific criteria, such as whether the brand was listed on F1 or CDL when the drug was first determined as a pharmaceutical item (subsection 99ADB(6C)). Companies with a PBS listed brand of the affected drugs must provide comments on potential originator brand determinations (subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901). These obligations ensure that the determination process is transparent and considers the input of relevant stakeholders. There are no explicit offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined for breaches of this determination. However, failure to comply with the obligations may result in administrative or regulatory actions. Given the context, the primary focus of this instrument is to facilitate price reductions and improve the affordability of PBS medicines rather than impose punitive measures. The intent is to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the PBS by aligning government prices more closely with the prices of generic brands, thereby benefiting consumers through reduced out-of-pocket costs.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.