EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953
NATIONAL HEALTH (LISTING OF PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS) AMENDMENT
INSTRUMENT 2015 (No. 11)
PB 107 of 2015
Purpose
The purpose of this legislative instrument, made under sections 84AF, 84AK, 85, 85A, 88 and 101 of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act), is to amend the National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Instrument 2012 (PB 71 of 2012) to make changes to the pharmaceutical benefits listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and related matters.
PB 71 of 2012 determines the pharmaceutical benefits that are on the PBS through declarations of drugs and medicinal preparations, and determinations of forms, manners of administration and brands. It also provides for related matters (responsible persons, prescribing circumstances, maximum quantities, numbers of repeats, determined quantity and pack quantity, section 100‑only status and prescriber bag only status).
Authority
This Instrument exercises various powers in Part VII of the Act, as set out below:
Pharmaceutical benefits listed on the PBS
Subsection 85(2) provides that the Minister may declare drugs and medicinal preparations to which Part VII applies. A drug or medicinal preparation for which there is a declaration in force under subsection 85(2) is a ‘listed drug’ (subsection 4(1)). Subsections 85(3) and 85(5) respectively provide that the Minister may determine the form or forms of a listed drug and the manner of administration of a form of a listed drug. A listed drug in a determined form with a determined manner of administration for that form is a pharmaceutical item (section 84AB). Subsection 85(6) provides that the the Minister may determine a brand of a pharmaceutical item.
The Minister may also determine the responsible person for a brand of a pharmaceutical item (subsection 84AF(1)). Under the provisions of section 84AK the Minister may determine the determined quantity and pack quantity for a brand of a pharmaceutical item.
Prescribing pharmaceutical benefits
Subsection 88(1) provides that a medical practitioner is authorised to prescribe a pharmaceutical benefit. Section 88 provides that the Minister may determine the pharmaceutical benefits that may be prescribed by different classes of prescribers, including participating dental practitioners (subsection 88(1A)), authorised optometrists (subsection 88(1C)), authorised midwives (subsection 88(1D)) and authorised nurse practitioners (subsection 88(1E)).
Subsection 85(7) provides that the Minister may determine the circumstances in which a prescription may be written for the supply of a pharmaceutical benefit.
Paragraph 85A(2)(a) allows the Minister to determine the maximum quantity or number of units of the pharmaceutical item in a pharmaceutical benefit (or of the pharmaceutical benefit where there is no pharmaceutical item) that may, in one prescription, be directed to be supplied on one occasion. Paragraph 85A(2)(b) also allows the Minister to determine the maximum number of occasions on which the supply of the pharmaceutical benefit may, in one prescription, be directed to be repeated. The maximum quantities and repeats may be determined for all purposes or for particular purposes.
Supplying pharmaceutical benefits
Subsection 85(2A) provides that the Minister must declare that a particular listed drug can only be provided under a special arrangement under section 100 if the PBAC has recommended under subsection 101(4AAD) that the drug be made available only under special arrangements under section 100.
Paragraph 85(8)(a) provides that the Minister may determine that a particular pharmaceutical benefit may only be supplied under special arrangements under section 100.
Paragraph 85(8)(b) provides that the Minister may determine that a particular pharmaceutical benefit may only be supplied under special arrangements under section 100 for one or more of the circumstances determined for that pharmaceutical benefit under subsection 85(7).
Subsection 85(2AA) provides that the Minister must declare that a particular listed drug can only be provided under one or more of the prescriber bag provisions if the PBAC has recommended under subsection 101(4AACA) that the drug be made available only under one or more of the prescriber bag provisions.
Paragraph 85(7A) provides that the Minister may determine that a particular pharmaceutical benefit may only be supplied under one or more of the prescriber bag provisions.
New subsection 85(6A) provides that the Minister may also determine for the purposes of paragraph 103(2A)(b) that a brand of a pharmaceutical item determined under subsection 85(6) is to be treated as equivalent to one or more other brands of pharmaceutical items.
Variation and revocation
Unless there is an express power to revoke or vary PB 71 of 2012 cited in this Instrument and explanatory statement, subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is relied upon to revoke or vary PB 71 of 2012.
Subsection 101(4AAA) allows the Minister to, by legislative instrument, revoke or vary a subsection 85(2) declaration in relation to a drug or medicinal preparation. Advice from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) is required if the effect of the legislative instrument would be that a drug or medicinal preparation would cease to be a listed drug (subsection 101(4AAB)).
Changes to PB 71 of 2012 made by this instrument
Schedule 1 to this instrument provides for additions, deletions and changes to drugs, forms, brands, responsible person codes, maximum quantities, the circumstances for prescribing various pharmaceutical benefits (including authority requirements), equivalent brands, determined quantities, pack quantities, section 100 only status and prescriber bag only status. These changes are summarised, by subject matter, in the Attachment.
The amendments to PB 71 of 2012 relating to the determination under subsection 85(6A) of brands to be treated as equivalent are necessary to implement a measure contained in the PBS Access and Sustainability Package announced by the Australian Government in May 2015. Amendments to the Act for that purpose were made by the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Act 2015 (the Amending Act). The Amending Act also provides in new subsection 85(6B) that, in deciding whether a brand of a pharmaceutical item is to be treated as equivalent, the Minister must have regard to any advice given by the PBAC and in new subsection 101(4AACC) that the PBAC may give such advice. New subsection 85(6C) provides that a brand specified in the Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits on 1 November 2015 as equivalent to one or more other brands of pharmaceutical items is taken to have been determined to that effect under subsection 85(6A).
This instrument amends PB 71 of 2012 to insert a new section 8A as a consqence of the Amending Act. Section 8A provides that equivalence of an added brand under subsection 85(6A) to a new or existing brand of the same pharmaceutical item is shown by the inclusion of an ‘a’ against those brands in the column headed ‘Schedule Equivalent’ in Schedule 1. Where an added brand is equivalent to a new or existing brand of a different pharmaceutical item, the brands are included in new Schedule 5 together with any new or existing brands of the same pharmaceutical item to which the added brand is equivalent and as part of the same schedule equivalent group.
Schedule 1 includes an added biosimilar brand for the listed drug infliximab. The PBAC recommended that the biosimilar brand of infliximab be treated as equivalent to the existing brand. The determination of this added brand as schedule equivalent to the existing brand is the first occurrence of a biosimilar brand being treated as equivalent to another brand.
Consultation
The involvement of interested parties through the membership of PBAC constitutes a formal and ongoing process of consultation. PBAC is an independent expert body established by section 100A of the Act which makes recommendations to the Minister about which drugs and medicinal preparations should be available as pharmaceutical benefits. PBAC members are appointed following nomination by prescribed organisations and associations from consumers, health economists, practising community pharmacists, general practitioners, clinical pharmacologists and specialists, with at least one member selected from each of those interests or professions. Remaining members are persons whom the Minister is satisfied have qualifications and experience in a field relevant to the functions of the PBAC, and that would enable them to contribute meaningfully to the deliberations of the PBAC. When recommending the listing of a medicine on the PBS, the PBAC takes into account the medical conditions for which the medicine has been approved for use in Australia, its clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness compared with other treatments.
Pharmaceutical companies are consulted throughout the process of the listing of their medicines on the PBS and in relation to changes to those listings. This includes the company submission to the PBAC and involvement throughout the PBAC process, negotiations or consultation on price, guarantee of supply and agreement to final listing details.
Since the announcement of the PBS Medication Charts for Public and Private Hospitals measure in 2014, the Department of Health has undertaken an extensive consultation process involving all key health stakeholders. These consultations indicate widespread and strong support for the trial of the PBS Hospital Medication Chart and amendments required to the Regulations and associated legislative instruments to support the measure. Consulted stakeholders include States and Territories, Australian Private Hospital Association, Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia, Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, Pharmacy Guild of Australia, Australian Medical Association, Cancer Voices Australia, Consumers Health Forum of Australia, National Prescribing Service, the ACSQHC, and the National E-Health Transition Authority. Similarly, the Department of Human Services has received strong support from a range of stakeholders for the implementation of paperless (electronic) claiming of PBS/RPBS medicines. This includes support for transitional arrangements to ensure stakeholder readiness for the implementation of paperless PBS/RPBS claiming.
The PBS Access and Sustainability Package (the PBS Package) includes measures relating to the Sixth Community Pharmacy Agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and the Pharmacy Guild of Australia and the Strategic Agreement with the Generic Medicines Industry Association (now known as the Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association). The measures were negotiated following consultations during the first half of 2015 by the Minister for Health and the Department of Health with stakeholders from the pharmaceutical sector including industry, consumer, medical, pharmacist and wholesaler groups. Organisations represented included Medicines Australia, the Generic Medicines Industry Association, the Consumers Health Forum, NPS MedicineWise, the Australian Medical Association, the Pharmacy Guild of Australia, the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia, and the National Pharmaceutical Services Association.
The PBAC has advised that biosimilars should be considered substitutable at the pharmacy level where the data to support that are available and that each biosimilar would be considered on a case-by-case basis.
In July 2015, the PBAC held a consumer hearing regarding the use of biosimilars in Australia. Representatives of consumer organisations, clinical groups and industry groups attended. Fact sheets on biosimilar medicines for health professionals and consumers were published on the PBS website on 21 August 2015.
The PBS Package includes a $20 million awareness initiative to support the use of biosimilar medicines by patients, pharmacists and specialists. The initiative aims to raise awareness among prescribers, patients and pharmacists of the issues and responsibilities around biosimilars. It aims also to contribute to the sustainability of the PBS by encouraging biosimilar manufacturers to enter the market and deliver savings from increased biosimilar uptake. There is a range of opportunities for stakeholders across the sector and the wider community to provide input.
The Department of Health developed an Implementation Framework for the project, which was made available for comment via an online survey between 8 and 26 October 2015. The Department will continue to develop and implement biosimilars awareness activities with on‑going input from stakeholders.
General
A provision by provision description of this Instrument is contained in the Attachment.
This Instrument commences on 1 December 2015.
This Instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
ATTACHMENT
PROVISION BY PROVISION DESCRIPTION OF THE NATIONAL HEALTH (LISTING OF PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS) AMENDMENT INSTRUMENT 2015 (No. 11)
Section 1 Name of Instrument
This section provides that the Instrument is the National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Amendment Instrument 2015 (No. 11) and may also be cited as PB 107 of 2015.
Section 2 Commencement
This section provides that this Instrument commences on 1 December 2015.
Section 3 Amendment of the National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Instrument 2012 (PB 71 of 2012)
This section provides that Schedule 1 amends the National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Instrument 2012 (PB 71 of 2012).
Schedule 1 Amendments
The amendments in Schedule 1 involve additions, deletions and changes to forms, brands, responsible person codes, maximum quantities, the circumstances for prescribing various pharmaceutical benefits (including authority requirements and brand equivalence), determined quantities, pack quantities and section 100 only status. These changes are summarised below.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Listed Drugs Added
Aclidinium with eformoterol |
Axitinib |
Brinzolamide with brimonidine |
Tiotropium with olodaterol |
Forms Added
Benztropine | Injection containing benztropine mesylate 2 mg in 2 mL vial |
Rivastigmine | Transdermal patch 27 mg |
Rizatriptan | Tablet (orally disintegrating) 10 mg (as benzoate) |
Zoledronic acid | Solution for I.V. infusion 4 mg (as monohydrate) in 100 mL |
Forms Deleted
Amino acid formula with vitamins and minerals without phenylalanine | Sachets containing oral powder 29 g, 30 (PKU Anamix Junior) |
Amino acid formula with vitamins and minerals without phenylalanine and tyrosine | Sachets containing oral powder 29 g, 30 (TYR Anamix Junior) |
Amino acid formula with vitamins and minerals without valine, leucine and isoleucine | Sachets containing oral powder 29 g, 30 (MSUD Anamix Junior) |
Epirubicin | Solution for injection containing epirubicin hydrochloride 10 mg in 5 mL |
Schedule Equivalent
A column has been added preceding the column headed “Brand” for the purpose of indicating brands which may be equivalent for the purpose of substitution
Brands Added
Clindamycin | Capsule 150 mg (as hydrochloride) (Clindamyk) |
Granisetron | Concentrated injection 3 mg (as hydrochloride) in 3 mL (GRANISETRON APOTEX) |
Infliximab | Powder for I.V. infusion 100 mg (Inflectra) |
Lercanidipine | Tablet containing lercanidipine hydrochloride 10 mg (Blooms the Chemist Lercanidipine) |
Mometasone | Lotion containing mometasone furoate 1 mg per g, 30 mL (Momasone) |
Paclitaxel | Solution concentrate for I.V. infusion 30 mg in 5 mL (Paclitaxel ACT) |
Rabeprazole | Tablet containing rabeprazole sodium 20 mg (enteric coated) (Rabeprazole SUN) |
Rizatriptan | Wafer 10 mg (as benzoate) (Rizatriptan Wafers-10mg) |
Somatropin | Solution for injection 5 mg (15 i.u.) in 1.5 mL cartridge (with preservative) (Omnitrope Surepal 5) |
Sumatriptan | Tablet 50 mg (as succinate) (Imigran) |
Zoledronic acid | Injection concentrate for I.V. infusion 4 mg (as monohydrate) in 5 mL |
Brands Deleted
Amiodarone | Tablet containing amiodarone hydrochloride 200 mg (Amiodarone Actavis) |
Bisacodyl | Tablet 5 mg (Bisalax) |
Captopril | Tablet 12.5 mg (GenRx Captopril) |
Cefaclor | Powder for oral suspension 125 mg (as monohydrate) per 5 mL, 100 mL (GenRx Cefaclor) |
Ceftriaxone | Powder for injection 2 g (as sodium) (Ceftriaxone Sandoz) |
Enalapril | Tablet containing enalapril maleate 5 mg (Chem mart Enalapril; GenRx Enalapril; Terry White Chemists Enalapril) |
Fosinopril | Tablet containing fosinopril sodium 10 mg (GenRx Fosinopril) |
Fosinopril with Hydrochlorothiazide | Tablet containing fosinopril sodium 10 mg with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (APO-Fosinopril HCTZ 10/12.5) |
Moclobemide | Tablet 150 mg (Chem mart Moclobemide; Terry White Chemists Moclobemide) |
Paraffin | Eye ointment, compound, containing white soft paraffin with liquid paraffin, |
Sotalol | Tablet containing sotalol hydrochloride 160 mg (Chem mart Sotalol; GenRx Sotalol; Terry White Chemists Sotalol) |
Alteration of Responsible Person
Listed Drug | Form | Brand Name | Responsible Person |
Ampicillin | Powder for injection 500 mg (as sodium) | Ibimicyn | From: Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (EA) To: Juno Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (JU) |
Flucloxacillin | Powder for injection 500 mg (as sodium) | Flubiclox | From: Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (EA) To: Juno Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (JU) |
Isotretinoin | Capsule 10 mg | Oratane | From: Actavis Pty Ltd (GN) To: Allergan Australia Pty Limited (AG) |
Oxybutynin | Transdermal patches 36 mg, 8 | Oxytrol | From: Actavis Pty Ltd (GN) To: Allergan Australia Pty Limited (AG) |
Testosterone | Transdermal patches 12.2 mg, 60 | Androderm | From: Actavis Pty Ltd (GN) To: Allergan Australia Pty Limited (AG) |
Tirofiban | Solution concentrate for I.V. infusion 12.5 mg (as hydrochloride) in 50 mL | Tirofiban AC | From: Actavis Pty Ltd (GN) To: Juno Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (JO) |
Addition of Responsible Person Code
Juno Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (JO) |
Juno Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (JU) |
Ranbaxy Australia Pty Limited (RN) |
Alteration of Circumstances
Listed Drug | Alteration |
Dapagliflozin | Circumstances amended in respect of triple oral therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus |
Dapagliflozin with metformin | Circumstances amended in respect of triple oral therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus |
Dornase alfa | Circumstances amended for the treatment of cystic fibrosis |
Everolimus |
|
Leuprorelin | Circumstances amended for the treatment of central precocious puberty |
Mannitol | Circumstances amended for the treatment of cystic fibrosis |
Saxagliptin |
|
Saxagliptin with metformin |
|
Sitagliptin |
|
Sitagliptin with metformin |
|
Zoledronic acid |
|
Alteration of Circumstances Code
The circumstances codes for the following drugs in Schedule 1 and the corresponding circumstances codes in Schedule 4 to the principal instrument have changed. Any other changes to these listings are detailed under the relevant headings in this summary.
Acitretin |
Albendazole |
Alprazolam |
Amino acid formula without phenylalanine |
Amino acid formula with vitamins, minerals and long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids without phenylalanine |
Amiodarone |
Amisulpride |
Amlodipine with atorvastatin |
Artemether with lumefantrine |
Asenapine |
Atorvastatin |
Atovaquone |
Atovaquone with proguanil |
Azithromycin |
Benzydamine |
Bicalutamide |
Bisacodyl |
Ciprofloxacin |
Clarithromycin |
Degarelix |
Esomeprazole and clarithromycin and amoxycillin |
Fluconazole |
Flutamide |
Fondaparinux |
Glycerol |
Hyoscine |
Idarubicin |
Indacaterol with glycopyrronium |
Itraconazole |
Lansoprazole |
Leflunomide |
Leuprorelin |
Medroxyprogesterone |
Methotrexate |
Methylnaltrexone |
Metronidazole |
Mycophenolic acid |
Nilutamide |
Nitrazepam |
Norfloxacin |
Octreotide |
Omeprazole |
Ondansetron |
Palonosetron |
Pancreatic extract |
Pancrelipase |
Paraffin |
Phenoxymethylpenicillin |
Posaconazole |
Praziquantel |
Quetiapine |
Quinine |
Rabeprazole |
Reteplase |
Sorbitol with sodium citrate and sodium lauryl sulfoacetate |
Sotalol |
Sterculia with frangula bark |
Tamoxifen |
Temazepam |
Tenecteplase |
Ticagrelor |
Tipranavir |
Tirofiban |
Triglycerides long chain with glucose polymer |
Triglycerides, medium chain |
Triglycerides—medium chain, formula |
Triglycerides, medium chain and long chain with glucose polymer |
Triptorelin |
Tropisetron |
Umeclidinium with vilanterol |
Ursodeoxycholic acid |
Vancomycin |
Venlafaxine |
Voriconazole |
Ziprasidone |
Addition of Schedule 5 ─ Schedule Equivalent
Schedule 5 provides details of pharmaceutical items which are deemed to be equivalent within specified groups for the purpose of substitution
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Amendment Instrument 2015 (No. 11)
(PB 107 of 2015)
This Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the Instrument
The National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Amendment Instrument 2015 (No. 11) amends the National Health (Listing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Instrument 2012 (the Principal Instrument) which determines the pharmaceutical benefits that are on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) through declarations of drugs and medicinal preparations, and determinations of forms, manners of administration and brands. It also provides for related matters (responsible persons, prescribing circumstances, maximum quantities, numbers of repeats, determined quantities, pack quantities, section 100 only status and prescriber bag only status).
Schedule 1 to this Instrument provides for additions, deletions and changes to drugs, forms, brands, responsible person codes, maximum quantities, the circumstances for prescribing various pharmaceutical benefits (including authority requirements), equivalent brands, determined quantities, pack quantities, section 100 only status and prescriber bag only status.
The Amendment Instrument also amends the Principal Instrument by inserting Section 8A. This reflects changes to the National Health Act 1953 (the Act) made by the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Act 2015 (the Amendment Act) and required for implementation of measures contained in the PBS Access and Sustainability Package announced by the Australian Government in May 2015. Under the new provisions, the Minister may determine that a brand of a pharmaceutical item is to be treated as equivalent to one or more other brands of pharmaceutical items. This is for the purpose of specifying which brands could be supplied by a pharmacist as a substitute benefit instead of a specified benefit on a prescription. This policy is commonly referred to as ‘brand substitution’.
Human rights implications
This Instrument engages Articles 2 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by assisting with the progressive realisation by all appropriate means of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.
The PBS is a benefit scheme which assists with advancement of this human right by providing for subsidised access by patients to medicines. The recommendatory role of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) ensures that decisions about subsidised access to medicines on the PBS are evidence-based.
The changes made by the Amendment Instrument provide for determinations regarding equivalent brands to be included in the Principal Instrument, the same instrument as the listing details for the brands.
The Amendment Act provided for equivalent brands to be determined by the Minister via a legislative instrument and for the Minister to have regard to any advice provided by the PBAC regarding equivalent brands. There was no change to subsection 103(2A) of the Act which provides the legal basis for brand substitution, a policy which has been in place for PBS medicines since 1994. Since that time, equivalent brands have been specified in the Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits issued by the Department of Health. More recently, equivalent brands have also been indicated in the electronic version of the Schedule published on the PBS website.
In Australia, brand substitution policy for PBS medicines provides choice for consumers and prescribers. Prescribers can choose to allow substitution to occur, or can indicate via the ‘brand substitution not permitted’ box on the prescription form that only the prescribed brand is to be dispensed. If the option is left open, the brand supplied is a matter for the consumer and pharmacist.
The PBS Access and Sustainability Package (the PBS package) established pharmacy funding, medicines pricing arrangements and a range of sector improvements to ensure ongoing access to innovative medicines through a sustainable PBS. The package contained measures relating to the Sixth Community Pharmacy Agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and the Pharmacy Guild of Australia and the Strategic Agreement with the Generic Medicines Industry Association (now known as the Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association). It included the measure for the Minister to determine equivalent brands and measures regarding the inclusion and use of biosimilar medicines on the PBS. Measures were negotiated following consultations with a wide range of stakeholders from pharmacy, pharmaceutical industry and consumer groups.
The amendments to Schedule 1 of the Principal Instrument include an added brand for the listed drug infliximab, which is used for chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn disease. The added brand is biosimilar to the existing brand, has been determined as a brand of the same pharmaceutical item, and determined as equivalent to the existing brand. This is the first occurrence of a biosimilar brand being treated as equivalent to another brand for PBS brand substitution purposes.
Substitution by pharmacists of biosimilar brands for reference biological medicines is becoming established in a number of countries. The PBAC has advised that biosimilars should be considered substitutable at the pharmacy level where the data to support that are available and that each biosimilar would be considered on a case-by-case basis. The PBAC recommended that the new brand of infliximab be treated as equivalent to the existing brand.
In July 2015, the PBAC held a consumer hearing regarding the use of biosimilars in Australia. Representatives of consumer organisations, clinical groups and industry groups attended. Fact sheets on biosimilar medicines for Health Professionals and Consumers were published on the PBS website on 21 August 2015.
A key measure of the PBS Package is a $20 million awareness initiative to support the use of biosimilar medicines by patients, pharmacists and specialists. The initiative aims to raise awareness among prescribers, patients and pharmacists of the issues and responsibilities around biosimilars, including the types of conversations patients might have with their prescribers and pharmacists. It aims also to contribute to the sustainability of the PBS by encouraging biosimilar manufacturers to enter the market and deliver savings from increased biosimilar uptake. There is a range of opportunities for stakeholders across the sector and the wider community to provide input.
The Department of Health has developed an Implementation Framework for the project, which was made available for comment via an online survey between 8 and 26 October 2015. The Department will continue to consult with stakeholders in developing and implementing biosimilars awareness activities.
Conclusion
This Instrument is compatible with human rights because it advances the protection of human rights through continued access to subsidised medicines.
The determination of brands of pharmaceutical items as equivalent is consistent with long-standing administrative practice and will not affect access to, or choice of PBS medicines, for consumers or prescribers. The listing and use of biosimilar medicines is being undertaken with the expert advice of the PBAC and with full and open industry and community consultation. The determination of a biosimilar brand as equivalent to an existing brand is justified on the basis of expert advice, aligns with current brand choice mechanisms, and is consistent with policies to support the sustainability of the PBS through competitive pricing. None of these changes impinges on human rights.
Penny Shakespeare
First Assistant Secretary
Pharmaceutical Benefits Division
Department of Health