National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2024 (No. 1)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2024L00127 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

National Health Act 1953

 

National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2024 (No. 1)

 

PB 7 of 2024

 

Authority

 

This instrument, made under subsection 85AB(1) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act), amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021 (PB 33 of 2021)  (the Principal Determination).

 

The Principal Determination provides for the allocation of drugs to the F1 and F2 formularies of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

 

Purpose

 

This instrument makes amendments to the Principal Determination.

 

The Act provides that PBS listed drugs may be assigned to formularies identified as F1 and F2. F1 is intended for single branded drugs and F2 for drugs that have multiple brands, or are in a therapeutic group with other drugs with multiple brands. Drugs on F2 are subject to the provisions of the Act relating to price disclosure and guarantee of supply.

 

Section 84AC of the Act provides that a drug is on F1 or F2 if there is a determination in force under section 85AB that the drug is on F1 or F2.

 

Subsection 85AB(1) of the Act empowers the Minister (or delegate) to determine by legislative instrument that a listed drug is on F1 or F2. For a drug to be on F1, it must satisfy the criteria in subsection 85AB(4). This requires that there are no listed brands of pharmaceutical items that have the drug that are bioequivalent or biosimilar, and no listed brands of pharmaceutical items that have another drug in the same therapeutic group as the first drug that are bioequivalent or biosimilar. It also requires that the drug was not on F2 the day before the determination comes into effect. A drug may only be determined to be on F2 if it does not satisfy one or more of the criteria for F1 (subsection 85AB(3)).

 

When subsection 85AB(5) of the Act applies, which relates to listed drugs with a single brand combination item on the PBS, the listed drug is not placed on F1 or F2, but on the administrative combination drug list (CDL).

 

This instrument amends the Principal Determination by adding to F1 one new drug, tebentafusp and removes two drugs, efavirenz and ertugliflozin from F1 as these drugs will no longer be PBS listed from 1 February 2024. In addition, it also moves one currently listed F1 drug, amantadine to F2.

 

 

 

 

Variation and revocation

 

Unless there is an express power to revoke or vary PB 33 of 2021 cited in this instrument, subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is relied upon to revoke or vary PB 33 of 2021.

 

Consultation

 

This instrument affects pharmaceutical companies with new medicines listing on the PBS.

Tebentafusp meets the criteria for F1 under subsection 85AB(4).  Efavirenz and ertugliflozin are being removed from the PBS at the request of the pharmaceutical company that sponsor the PBS listings.  Amantadine no longer meets the criteria for F1 set out in section 85AB(4) of the Act so is required to be moved to F2 under subsection 85AB(3). 

 

Before a drug is PBS listed and allocated to a formulary, there are detailed consultations about the drug with the responsible person and recommendations from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). Any PBAC recommendation is made following receipt of a submission made by the affected pharmaceutical company. Two-thirds of the PBAC membership is from the following interests or professions: consumers, health economists, practising community pharmacists, general practitioners, clinical pharmacologists and medical specialists.

 

No additional consultation with experts was undertaken regarding this determination because consultation with the affected responsible persons and the PBAC drew on the knowledge of persons with relevant expertise.

 

Commencement

 

This instrument commences on 1 February 2024.

 

This instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2024 (No. 1)
(PB 7 of 2024)

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

 

This legislative instrument is made pursuant to subsection 85AB(1) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act), which relates to listed drugs on F1 or F2. This instrument amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021 (PB 33 of 2021) (the Principal Determination) which provides for the allocation of drugs to the F1 and F2 formularies of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

 

This instrument amends the Principal Determination by adding to F1 one new drug, tebentafusp and removes two drugs, efavirenz and ertugliflozin from F1 as these drugs will no longer be PBS listed from 1 February 2024. In addition, it also moves one currently listed F1 drug, amantadine to F2.

 

Human rights implications

 

This legislative instrument engages Articles 2 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by assisting with the progressive realisation by all appropriate means of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

 

The PBS assists with the advancement of this human right by providing for subsidised access of medicines to patients. The recommendatory role of the  PBAC ensures that decisions about subsidised access to medicines on the PBS are evidence-based.

 

The right to social security is contained in Article 9 of the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). It requires that a country must, within its maximum available resources, ensure access to a social security scheme that provides a minimum essential level of benefits to all individuals and families that will enable them to acquire at least essential health care. Countries are obliged to demonstrate that every effort has been made to use all resources that are at their disposal in an effort to satisfy, as a matter of priority, this minimum obligation.

 

It is noted that this amending instrument requests the delisting of two drugs – efavirenz and ertugliflozin which will result in these drugs being no longer available at a subsidised price.

 

The delisting of efavirenz and ertugliflozin, from the PBS occurred at the request of the sponsor, Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd. The PBAC advised that the delisting of these drugs would not result in unmet clinical need.

Patients accessing PBS subsidised medicines are usually required to pay a co-payment towards their cost. From 1 January 2024, these fees are up to $31.60 for general patients and up to $7.70 for concession card holders. These co-payments are payable for accessing all PBS subsidised medicines. The deletion of efavirenz and ertugliflozin is therefore unlikely to result in a negative financial impact for patients as alternatives are subsidised and the same maximum co-payments apply to all PBS listed medicines.

The UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights reports that there is a strong presumption that retrogressive measures taken in relation to the right to social security are prohibited under ICESCR. In this context, a retrogressive measure would be one taken without adequate justification that had the effect of reducing existing levels of social security benefits, or of denying benefits to persons or groups previously entitled to them. However, it is legitimate for a government to re-direct its limited resources in ways that it considers to be more effective at meeting the general health needs of all society, particularly the needs of the more disadvantaged members of society.

 

Conclusion

 

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights. Human rights continue to be protected by retaining clinically important medicines on the PBS and placing them in formularies that ensure the most cost-effective pricing for supply of each medicine to Australians.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Nikolai Tsyganov

 Assistant Secretary

Pricing and PBS Policy Branch

Technology Assessment and Access Division

Department of Health and Aged Care

Overview

The National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2024 (No. 1) amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021, which allocates drugs to the F1 and F2 formularies of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This amendment was enacted to adjust the allocation of certain drugs within the PBS formularies, ensuring they align with the criteria set forth in the National Health Act 1953. The determination was made under subsection 85AB(1) of the Act and is authorised by the Australian Parliament. The policy objective is to maintain the integrity of the PBS by ensuring that drugs are categorised appropriately within the formularies, thereby facilitating cost-effective and accessible healthcare for all Australians. The amendments include the addition of tebentafusp to the F1 formulary, removal of efavirenz and ertugliflozin from the F1 formulary as these drugs will no longer be PBS listed, and the reclassification of amantadine from F1 to F2. This legislative instrument ensures that the PBS continues to provide equitable access to essential medicines, balancing the need for cost-effective healthcare with the rights of individuals to necessary medical treatments.

Scope and Application

The National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2024 (No. 1) amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021, which governs the allocation of drugs to the F1 and F2 formularies of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This legislation applies to pharmaceutical companies and the Department of Health and Aged Care in the context of drug listings and formulary placements within the PBS. The amendment impacts the national jurisdiction, as it pertains to the PBS, a Commonwealth scheme. The changes involve adding the drug tebentafusp to F1, removing efavirenz and ertugliflozin from F1, and moving amantadine from F1 to F2, effective from 1 February 2024. This amendment does not introduce new exclusions or exemptions but modifies the existing placements of drugs within the PBS formularies. The application of this instrument is further governed by the National Health Act 1953 and is subject to the criteria outlined for F1 and F2 placements, which include bioequivalence and biosimilarity assessments. This legislative instrument aligns with human rights by facilitating access to affordable and essential health care, while ensuring decisions are evidence-based and aimed at meeting the broader health needs of Australians.

Key Provisions

The National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2024 (No. 1) (PB 7 of 2024) amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021 (PB 33 of 2021) by making changes to the allocation of drugs within the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) formularies. Specifically, this instrument adds tebentafusp to F1, and removes efavirenz and ertugliflozin from F1 as these drugs will cease to be listed on the PBS from 1 February 2024. Additionally, amantadine is moved from F1 to F2. F1 is intended for single-branded drugs, while F2 is designated for drugs with multiple brands or those in therapeutic groups with other multi-branded drugs. The changes are based on the criteria set out in the National Health Act 1953, particularly sections 85AB(3) and 85AB(4), which govern the criteria for inclusion in F1 and F2. This legislative instrument imposes specific obligations on pharmaceutical companies and the Department of Health and Aged Care. Pharmaceutical companies must submit information and recommendations through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) for any new drug they wish to list on the PBS. The PBAC, which comprises experts from various relevant fields, reviews the submissions and makes recommendations to the Minister. The Department of Health and Aged Care is responsible for implementing the PBAC recommendations and ensuring the PBS formularies are updated accordingly. Additionally, pharmaceutical companies must notify the Department of any changes to their products or market strategies that might affect their PBS listing status. Failure to comply with the requirements of the Act and the Determination can lead to civil or criminal penalties. For example, if a pharmaceutical company submits false or misleading information to the Department or the PBAC, it could face penalties under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Similarly, if a person knowingly supplies a drug in a manner that contravenes the provisions of the Act, they could be liable for criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment. The maximum penalties for such offences can vary but are generally substantial, reflecting the seriousness of non-compliance with PBS regulations. In summary, the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2024 (No. 1) introduces specific changes to the allocation of drugs within the PBS formularies, with clear obligations for pharmaceutical companies and the Department of Health and Aged Care. Compliance with these provisions is crucial, as breaches can result in significant civil or criminal penalties.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.