National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2022 (No. 6)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2022L01020 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

National Health Act 1953

 

National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2022 (No. 6)

 

PB 75 of 2022

 

Authority

 

This instrument, made under subsection 85AB(1) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act), amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021 (PB 33 of 2021) (the Principal Determination).

 

The Principal Determination provides for the allocation of drugs to the F1 and F2 formularies of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

 

Purpose

 

This instrument makes amendments to the Principal Determination.

 

The Act provides that PBS listed drugs may be assigned to formularies identified as F1 and F2. F1 is intended for single branded drugs and F2 for drugs that have multiple brands, or are in a therapeutic group with other drugs with multiple brands. Drugs on F2 are subject to the provisions of the Act relating to price disclosure and guarantee of supply.

 

Section 84AC of the Act provides that a drug is on F1 or F2 if there is a determination in force under section 85AB that the drug is on F1 or F2.

 

Subsection 85AB(1) of the Act empowers the Minister (or delegate) to determine by legislative instrument that a listed drug is on F1 or F2.  For a drug to be on F1, it must satisfy the criteria in subsection 85AB(4). This requires that there are no listed brands of pharmaceutical items that have the drug that are bioequivalent or biosimilar, and no listed brands of pharmaceutical items that have another drug in the same therapeutic group as the first drug that are bioequivalent or biosimilar. It also requires that the drug was not on F2 the day before the determination comes into effect. A drug may only be determined to be on F2 if it does not satisfy one or more of the criteria for F1 (subsection 85AB(3)).

 

When subsection 85AB(5) of the Act applies, which relates to listed drugs with a single brand combination item on the PBS, the listed drug is not placed on F1 or F2, but on the administrative combination drug list (CDL).

 

This instrument amends the Principal Determination by adding to F1 one new drug, diroximel fumarate and removes one drug fotemustine from F1 as this drug will no longer be PBS listed. In addition, it also moves one currently listed drug, sitagliptin from F1 to F2 in addition to moving one currently listed drug, sitagliptin with metformin from the single brand Combination Drug List (CDL) to F2.

 

 

 

 

Variation and revocation

 

Unless there is an express power to revoke or vary PB 33 of 2021 cited in this instrument, subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is relied upon to revoke or vary PB 33 of 2021.

 

Consultation

 

This instrument affects pharmaceutical companies with new medicines listing on the PBS.  Diroximel fumarate meets the criteria for F1 under subsection 85AB(4). Fotemustine is being removed from the PBS at the request of the responsible person.

 

Sitagliptin no longer meets the criteria for F1 set out in section 85AB(4) of the Act so is required to be moved to F2.  Sitagliptin with metformin no longer meets the criteria for a drug on CDL so is required to be moved to F2.  

 

Before a drug is PBS listed and allocated to a formulary, there are detailed consultations about the drug with the responsible person and recommendations from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). Any PBAC recommendation is made following receipt of a submission made by the affected pharmaceutical company. Two-thirds of the PBAC membership is from the following interests or professions: consumers, health economists, practising community pharmacists, general practitioners, clinical pharmacologists and medical specialists.

 

No additional consultation with experts was undertaken regarding this determination because consultation with the affected responsible person and the PBAC drew on the knowledge of persons with relevant expertise.

 

Commencement

 

This instrument commences on 1 August 2022.

 

This instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2022 (No. 6)
(PB 75 of 2022)

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

This legislative instrument is made pursuant to subsection 85AB(1) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act), which relates to listed drugs on F1 or F2.  This instrument amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021 (PB 33 of 2021) (the Principal Determination) which provides for the allocation of drugs to the F1 and F2 formularies of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

 

This instrument amends the Principal Determination by adding to F1 one new drug, diroximel fumarate and removes one drug fotemustine from F1 as this drug will no longer be PBS listed. In addition, it also moves one currently listed drug, sitagliptin from F1 to F2 in addition to moving one currently listed drug, sitagliptin with metformin from the single brand Combination Drug List (CDL) to F2.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument engages Articles 2 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by assisting with the progressive realisation by all appropriate means of the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

The PBS assists with the advancement of this human right by providing for subsidised access of medicines to patients. The recommendatory role of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee ensures that decisions about subsidised access to medicines on the PBS are evidence-based.

The right to social security is contained in Article 9 of the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). It requires that a country must, within its maximum available resources, ensure access to a social security scheme that provides a minimum essential level of benefits to all individuals and families that will enable them to acquire at least essential health care. Countries are obliged to demonstrate that every effort has been made to use all resources that are at their disposal in an effort to satisfy, as a matter of priority, this minimum obligation.

The UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights reports that there is a strong presumption that retrogressive measures taken in relation to the right to social security are prohibited under ICESCR. In this context, a retrogressive measure would be one taken without adequate justification that had the effect of reducing existing levels of social security benefits, or of denying benefits to persons or groups previously entitled to them. However, it is legitimate for a Government to re-direct its limited resources in ways that it considers to be more effective at meeting the general health needs of all society, particularly the needs of the more disadvantaged members of society.

 

 

Delisting of fotemustine from the PBS occurred at the request of the company responsible for its supply in Australia (the sponsor) Servier Laboratories (Aust.) Pty. Ltd. Sponsors are private entities that make their own decisions regarding their products and cannot be compelled by the Government to continue to list a product on the PBS.

The deletion request for fotemustine was considered by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) at its meeting in March 2022. The PBAC considered that the deletion of fotemustine would not result in an unmet clinical need due to its low utilisation and the clinical advice that its role in therapy has been largely superseded by its clinical alternative, temozolomide that is available in six forms on the PBS.

The delisting of this item will not affect access to treatment as affected patients will be able to access alternate medicines through the PBS.

Patients accessing PBS subsidised medicines are usually required to pay a co-payment towards their cost. From 1 January 2022, these fees are up to $42.50 for general patients and up to $6.80 for concession card holders. These co-payments are payable for accessing all PBS subsidised medicines. The deletion of fotemustine is therefore unlikely to result in a negative financial impact for patients. This is due to the same maximum co-payments applying to all PBS listed medicines

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights. Human rights continue to be protected by retaining clinically important medicines on the PBS and placing them in formularies that ensure the most cost-effective pricing for supply of each medicine to Australians.

 

 

Nikolai Tsyganov

  Acting Assistant Secretary

Pricing and PBS Policy Branch

Technology Assessment and Access Division

Department of Health and Aged Care

 

Overview

The National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2022 (No. 6) amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021, which allocates drugs to the F1 and F2 formularies of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) under the National Health Act 1953. This legislative instrument, made under the authority of the Minister for Health, aims to address the allocation of specific drugs within the PBS by adding diroximel fumarate to F1, removing fotemustine from F1 as it is no longer PBS listed, and moving sitagliptin and sitagliptin with metformin from their current listings to F2. The policy objective of these amendments is to ensure that the PBS provides the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health by making effective use of resources and ensuring access to essential medicines. This determination reflects consultations with pharmaceutical companies and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, which comprises experts in various health-related fields. The amendments comply with human rights by maintaining access to essential medicines while adjusting the allocation to ensure cost-effective pricing and supply to Australians. The deletion of fotemustine from the PBS, at the request of the responsible sponsor, is justified by its low utilisation and the availability of alternative treatments on the PBS. This legislative instrument, compatible with international human rights standards, aims to progressively realise the right to the highest attainable standard of health.

Scope and Application

The National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2022 (No. 6) amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021, which allocates drugs to the F1 and F2 formularies of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) under the National Health Act 1953. The amendment adds diroximel fumarate to the F1 formulary and removes fotemustine from the F1 formulary as it will no longer be listed on the PBS. Additionally, sitagliptin and sitagliptin with metformin are moved from the F1 formulary and the Combination Drug List (CDL) to the F2 formulary respectively. The Act applies to the Minister for Health and Aged Care, pharmaceutical companies, and consumers of PBS-listed drugs. The amendments are made under the authority of the Act and affect entities and individuals involved in the PBS. The instrument has a national reach, applying across Australia. There are no stated exclusions or thresholds in the text. The Act allows for the extension or restriction of application through subordinate instruments, which may include further amendments to the Principal Determination. The instrument commences on 1 August 2022.

Key Provisions

The National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Amendment Determination 2022 (No. 6) (PB 75 of 2022) amends the National Health (Listed Drugs on F1 or F2) Determination 2021 (PB 33 of 2021) which governs the allocation of drugs to the F1 and F2 formularies of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). The key changes include the addition of diroximel fumarate to F1, the removal of fotemustine from F1 as it is no longer PBS listed, and the transfer of sitagliptin and sitagliptin with metformin from F1 to F2 (sections 2 and 3). The F1 formulary is designated for single-branded drugs, while F2 is for drugs with multiple brands or within therapeutic groups with multiple brands. Drugs on F2 are subject to price disclosure and supply guarantee provisions (subsection 85AB(4) and (5)). This amendment is effective from 1 August 2022. The Act imposes several obligations on parties involved in the PBS. Pharmaceutical companies must ensure that new drugs meet the criteria for F1 or F2 allocation as specified in subsection 85AB(4) and (5). The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) must review and recommend on the inclusion or exclusion of drugs on the PBS, considering factors such as clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and therapeutic alternatives. The Minister or delegate must make determinations based on PBAC recommendations and other relevant considerations. The responsible person for a drug can request its delisting from the PBS, as seen in the case of fotemustine. The Act also outlines potential consequences for non-compliance. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of the Act's provisions may lead to legal actions, fines, or other penalties as prescribed under Australian law. For instance, misrepresentation or failure to comply with PBS listing criteria could result in civil or criminal penalties, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach. The amendments ensure that the PBS remains aligned with the highest attainable standards of health care and social security, as recognised by international human rights instruments. The decisions to remove fotemustine and reclassify sitagliptin were based on clinical advice and low utilisation rates, ensuring continued access to essential medicines. This legislative instrument demonstrates a commitment to evidence-based decision-making and equitable access to health care, consistent with human rights obligations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.