National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement Amendment Instrument 2015 (No. 1) (PB 33 of 2015)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2015L00431 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953

National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement Amendment Instrument 2015 (No.1)

PB 33 of 2015

 

Authority

Subsection 100(1) of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act) enables the Minister to make special arrangements for the supply of pharmaceutical benefits. Subsection 100(2) of the Act provides that the Minister may vary or revoke a special arrangement made under subsection 100(1).

Subsection 100(3) of the Act provides that Part VII of the Act, and instruments made for the purposes of Part VII have effect subject to a special arrangement made under subsection 100(1).

Purpose

The purpose of this legislative instrument, made under subsections 100(1) and 100(2) of the Act, is to amend the National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement 2011 (PB 89 of 2011) (the Special Arrangement), to make changes relating to the Botulinum Toxin Program.

 

The purpose of the Special Arrangement is to allow for botulinum toxin to be supplied to specific patients through eligible medical practitioners.

 

This instrument:

  • Provides that Hospital Medication Chart prescribing, dispensing and claiming regulations contained within the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960, as amended by the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Amendment (Medication Chart Prescriptions) Regulation 2015, do not apply under the Special Arrangement; and
  • Clarifies the maximum number of treatment periods of botulinum toxin pharmaceutical benefits an eligible patient is eligible to receive for treatment of moderate to severe spasticity of the upper limbs in adults following a stroke, and defines under what circumstances an eligible patient is considered not to have responded to treatment; and
  • Inserts one new listed drug and, consequently, inserts one new responsible person and two new sub-treatment conditions, amends one treatment condition to include an additional listed drug, and inserts arrangements for eligible medical practitioners to hold emergency supplies of the new listed drug; and
  • Amends some minor typographical errors.

 

Consultation

The addition of these amendments was made having regard to advice provided by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). PBAC is an independent expert body established by section 100A of the Act which makes recommendations to the Minister about which drugs and medicinal preparations should be available as pharmaceutical benefits.

PBAC has broad representation with members appointed following nomination by prescribed organisations and associations from consumers, health economists, practising community pharmacists, general practitioners, clinical pharmacologists and specialists; at least one member is selected from each of those interests or professions. Remaining members are persons whom the Minister is satisfied have qualifications and experience in a field relevant to the functions of PBAC, and that would enable them to contribute meaningfully to the deliberations of PBAC. When recommending the listing of a medicine on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), PBAC takes into account the medical conditions for which the medicine has been approved for use in Australia, its clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness compared with other treatments.

Pharmaceutical companies are consulted throughout the process for additions and changes to listings on the PBS and for this Special Arrangement. This includes consultation through the PBAC process, which provides for consumers making submissions to the Committee in respect of proposals to be discussed, and agreement to final listing details.

General

This instrument commences on 1 April 2015.

This instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 


ATTACHMENT

PROVISION BY PROVISION DESCRIPTION OF THE NATIONAL HEALTH (BOTULINUM TOXIN PROGRAM) SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT AMENDMENT INSTRUMENT 2015 (No. 1)

Section 1  Name of Instrument

This section provides that this instrument is the National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement Amendment Instrument 2015 (No. 1) and that it may also be cited as PB 33 of 2015.

Section 2  Commencement

This section provides that this instrument commences on 1 April 2015.

Section 3   Amendments to PB 89 of 2011

This section provides that Schedule 1 amends the National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement 2011 (PB 89 of 2011) (the Special Arrangement).

Schedule 1

Item 1 inserts additional regulations to the list of regulations from the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960 (The Regulations) detailed at subsection 8(2) of the Special Arrangement that do not apply to the supply of botulinum toxin pharmaceutical benefits under the Special Arrangement, to provide that Hospital Medication Chart prescribing, dispensing and claiming regulations scheduled to commence on 1 April 2015 (as amended by the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Amendment (Medication Chart Prescriptions) Regulation 2015) do not apply under the Special Arrangement.

Item 2 inserts a new subsection, 11(2), to the Special Arrangement, to clarify the maximum number of treatment periods of botulinum toxin pharmaceutical benefits an eligible patient is eligible to receive for treatment of moderate to severe spasticity of the upper limbs in adults following a stroke. That is, 4 in total per upper limb per lifetime, not 4 per listed drug per upper limb per lifetime.

Item 3 makes an amendment to the subsection of the Special Arrangement lately numbered 11(2), to provide that under the Special Arrangement an eligible patient is not eligible to receive botulinum toxin pharmaceutical benefits for treatment of moderate to severe spasticity of the upper limbs in adults following stroke if the person has already received the maximum number of treatments detailed in the new subsection 11(2) (see item 2 description).

Item 4 amends the subsection of the Special Arrangement lately numbered 11(4)(a), to clarify the maximum number of treatment periods of botulinum toxin pharmaceutical benefits an eligible patient is eligible to receive without responding, for treatment of moderate to severe spasticity of the upper limbs in adults following a stroke. That is, 2 in total per upper limb, not 2 per listed drug per upper limb.

Items 5 and 6 amend subsection 11(4)(b)(ii) of the Special Arrangement to reflect the insertion of a new listed drug into Schedule 1 of the Special Arrangement (see item 23 description). Specifically, the amendment provides that an eligible patient is not eligible to receive botulinum toxin pharmaceutical benefits for treatment of moderate to severe spasticity of the upper limbs in adults following stroke if the eligible patient demonstrates a known sensitivity to any of the listed drugs, including the new listed drug.

Item 7 inserts a new subsection, 11(7), into the Special Arrangement. The new subsection defines the circumstances under which an eligible patient receiving botulinum toxin pharmaceutical benefits for treatment of moderate to severe spasticity of the upper limbs in adults following a stroke is considered to have not responded to treatment. That is, when the eligible patient has not had a decrease in spasticity rating of greater than 1, using the modified Ashworth Scale, in at least one joint.

Items 8, 9, 10 and 11 make consequential amendments to the subsection numbering in section 11 of the Special Arrangement, to reflect the insertion of the new subsection 11(2) (see item 2 description).

Items 12, 13 and 14 make minor typographical amendments to subsection 12B(1)(c) and section 17B of the Special Arrangement. In subsection 12B(1)(c) the word ‘phrophylatic’ is replaced with ‘prophylactic’ and the word ‘migrane’ is replaced with ‘migraine’. In section 17B the word ‘overctive’ in the section title is replaced with ‘overactive’.

Items 15 and 16 make consequential amendments to subsections 18(4)(b)(ii) and 18(5)(b)(ii) of the Special Arrangement, to reflect the insertion of a new sub-treatment condition (1B) into Schedule 3 of the Special Arrangement (see item 25 description). Specifically, the amendments allow for applicant practitioners who are specialists in ophthalmology (subsection 18(4)(b)(ii)), or neurology, otolaryngology head and neck surgery, or plastic surgery (subsection 18(5)(b)(ii)) to provide evidence of their training, for the purposes of seeking authorisation to administer botulinum toxin benefits for the new sub-treatment condition (1B), in the form of a letter from the responsible person for a botulinum toxin pharmaceutical benefit that has the same listed drug as is listed in the column in Schedule 3 headed ‘Listed Drug in Relevant Pharmaceutical Benefit’ for the new sub-treatment condition (1B).

Item 17 inserts a new subsection into the Special Arrangement, 26(5), consequential to the insertion of a new listed drug into Schedule 1 of the Special Arrangement (see item 23 description), allowing eligible medical practitioners to hold emergency supplies of the new listed drug.

Items 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 make consequential amendments to the subsection numbering in section 26 of the Special Arrangement, to reflect the insertion of the new subsection 26(5) (see item 17 description).

Item 23 inserts a new listed drug into Schedule 1 of the Special Arrangement.

Item 24 inserts a new responsible person into Schedule 2 of the Special Arrangement, consequential to the insertion of a new listed drug into Schedule 1 of the Special Arrangement (see item 23 description).

Item 25 inserts a new sub-treatment category into Schedule 3 of the Special Arrangement, treatment of blepharospasm in an adult (1B), consequential to the insertion of a new listed drug into Schedule 1 of the Special Arrangement (see item 23 description).

Item 26 inserts a new sub-treatment category into Schedule 3 of the Special Arrangement, treatment of spasmodic torticollis in an adult, either as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy to current standard care (4A), consequential to the insertion of a new listed drug into Schedule 1 of the Special Arrangement (see item 23 description).

Item 27 inserts a new listed drug into the column titled ‘Listed Drug in Relevant Pharmaceutical Benefit’ for treatment category 7 (treatment of moderate to severe spasticity of the upper limbs in adults following stroke, as second line therapy when standard management has failed or as an adjunct to physical therapy) in Schedule 3 of the Special Arrangement, consequential to the insertion of a new listed drug into Schedule 1 of the Special Arrangement (see item 23 description).


of the upper limbs in adults following a stroke, as second line therapy when standard management has failed or as an adjunct to physical therapy) in Schedule 3 of the Special Arrangement, consequential to the insertion of a new listed drug into Schedule 1 of the Special Arrangement (see item 23).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement Amendment Instrument 2015 (No. 1), commenced on 1 April 2015, amends the National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement 2011, which was established under subsection 100(1) of the National Health Act 1953 to allow for the supply of botulinum toxin to specific patients through eligible medical practitioners. This legislative instrument was introduced to address gaps in the existing Special Arrangement, particularly in relation to the administration of botulinum toxin for various medical conditions. The instrument was enacted by the Minister for Health under the authority provided by the National Health Act 1953, with a policy objective to refine and expand the program to better serve patients needing botulinum toxin treatments. The amendments were made following consultation with the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, which provides expert recommendations on which drugs should be available as pharmaceutical benefits under the National Health Act.

Scope and Application

The National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement Amendment Instrument 2015 (No.1) amends the National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement 2011, made under the National Health Act 1953, to modify the conditions and scope of the Botulinum Toxin Program. This special arrangement applies to eligible patients who require botulinum toxin for specific medical conditions, and to the eligible medical practitioners who administer the treatment. The instrument is applicable across the Commonwealth of Australia, as it pertains to the national pharmaceutical benefits scheme. The amendments made by this instrument clarify the eligibility criteria for patients, the conditions under which botulinum toxin can be administered, and the types of practitioners who can provide these treatments. Notably, this amendment excludes certain regulations from the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960 that would otherwise apply to the program, and it introduces new listed drugs, sub-treatment conditions, and responsible persons. The instrument also specifies the maximum number of treatment periods for certain conditions and outlines the criteria for non-response to treatment. The amendments are effective from 1 April 2015 and are subject to the overarching provisions of the National Health Act, which may be further refined or extended through subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement Amendment Instrument 2015 (No. 1) amends the National Health (Botulinum Toxin Program) Special Arrangement 2011 (PB 89 of 2011) (the Special Arrangement) to make several changes to the program. These changes include clarifying the number of treatment periods patients can receive for certain conditions (sections 11(2) and 11(4)(b)(ii)) and defining the circumstances under which a patient is considered not to have responded to treatment (section 11(7)). Additionally, the amendments exempt the program from certain Hospital Medication Chart prescribing, dispensing, and claiming regulations (section 8(2)), insert new listed drugs and sub-treatment conditions, and amend some typographical errors (items 23, 25, and 26). These changes are made to enhance the program’s effectiveness and ensure it aligns with current medical practices. The Act imposes specific obligations on parties involved in the Botulinum Toxin Program. Eligible patients must meet the criteria outlined in the Special Arrangement to receive treatment, which includes having a documented medical condition that falls within the approved treatment categories. Eligible medical practitioners must also adhere to the program’s regulations, including holding emergency supplies of the listed drugs as specified (section 26(5)). Additionally, pharmaceutical companies are required to provide necessary information and maintain the quality and safety of the drugs supplied under the program. The amendments also clarify the maximum number of treatments an eligible patient can receive and the circumstances under which a patient is not eligible to receive further treatment due to lack of response or sensitivity to the drugs. The National Health Act 1953 does not specify offences, penalties, or consequences for breaches of the amended Special Arrangement. However, non-compliance with the program’s regulations could potentially result in administrative actions or legal consequences under other related legislation. For example, if a practitioner administers botulinum toxin outside the scope of the program’s approved conditions, they could face disciplinary actions from their professional board or be subject to criminal charges if their actions are deemed to constitute misconduct or negligence. Similarly, pharmaceutical companies that fail to comply with the quality and safety standards could face regulatory penalties or be subject to civil actions for any harm caused by their products. It is essential for all parties to adhere to the amended Special Arrangement to avoid any potential legal or administrative repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.