National Health Act 1953 - Determination made pursuant to subsections 99ADB(4) and 99ADB(5) (No. PB 5 of 2011)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2011L00151 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

INSTRUMENT NUMBER PB 5 OF 2011

 

NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953

 

DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTIONS 99ADB (4) and 99ADB (5)

 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE DISCLOSED PRICE

 

Purpose and operation

This legislative instrument is made pursuant to subsections 99ADB (4) and 99ADB(5) of the National Health Act 1953 (“the Act”) and determines the weighted average disclosed price for certain brands of pharmaceutical items.

Part VII of the Act is the legislative basis for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) by which the Commonwealth provides reliable, timely, and affordable access to a wide range of medicines for all Australians.

Subsection 85(1) provides that benefits are to be provided by the Commonwealth in accordance with Part VII in respect of pharmaceutical benefits.

Drugs and medicinal preparations to which Part VII applies are declared by the Minister by legislative instrument to be so under subsection 85(2) of the Act. These are listed drugs as defined in subsection 84(1).

The Minister may also determine, by legislative instrument, the form or forms of a listed drug by reference to strength, type of unit, size of unit or otherwise (subsection 85(3)); the manner of administration of the form of the listed drug so determined (subsection 85(5)); and a brand of the pharmaceutical item (subsection 85(6)). A pharmaceutical item is a listed drug in a form determined under subsection 85(3) of the Act and with a manner of administration for that form of the drug determined under subsection 85(5) of the Act. A brand of a pharmaceutical item is a pharmaceutical benefit under Part VII of the Act.

PBS price disclosure commenced on 1 August 2007 following amendments to the Act and the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960 (“the Regulations) by the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Act 2007 (“the 2007 reforms”).

 

Further amendments to the Act and Regulations concerning price disclosure were made on
1 December 2010 with the commencement of the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Act 2010. However, for price disclosure cycles where the data collection period ended prior to 1 December 2010 but where the reduction day has not yet occurred, the Act and Regulations in force immediately prior to 1 December 2010 will continue to apply.

 

Under the 2007 reforms, subsections 99ADB (4) and (5) are located in Division 3B of the Act, which relates to price disclosure. Division 3B requires the responsible persons for certain brands of pharmaceutical items to comply with price disclosure requirements for each supply of a relevant brand of a pharmaceutical item. In some circumstances price disclosure is mandatory, and in others it is voluntary. In addition, Division 3B provides for reduction to the approved price to pharmacists of the brand of the pharmaceutical item in specified circumstances.

Subsection 99ADB (1) defines various terms used in Division 3B. One of these terms is the “weighted average disclosed price”. The weighted average disclosed price (“WADP”) of a brand of a pharmaceutical item is the price determined by the Minister pursuant to subsection 99ADB (4) or 99ADB (5).

Subsection 99ADB(4) provides that the Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine the WADP of a brand of a pharmaceutical item in accordance with the method set out in the Regulations.  The Minister uses information disclosed under the price disclosure requirements related to a particular period, as set out in the Regulations, to arrive at the WADP.

Subsection 99ADB (5) provides that if the Minister determines the WADP for one brand of a pharmaceutical item under subsection 99ADB (4) (“the first item”), then the Minister must, by legislative instrument, determine the WADP for every brand of every pharmaceutical item with the same drug and the same manner of administration as the first item. The WADP for these brands of pharmaceutical items is also calculated in accordance with the method set out in the Regulations.

Section 99ADH sets out when a price reduction, based on price disclosure, will occur, and how the new price will be set. Price disclosure related price reductions may only occur on     1 April or 1 August, being the reduction days prescribed by the Regulations.  

In summary, under the 2007 reforms, section 99ADH will apply to a brand of pharmaceutical item if the following requirements are met:

  • the Minister determines the WADP of a brand of a pharmaceutical item under subsection 99ADB(4) or 99ADB (5); 
  • a price agreement or price determination is in force in relation to that brand of a pharmaceutical item;
  • the WADP of the brand of pharmaceutical item is at least 10% less than its approved ex-manufacturer price; and
  • the responsible person was issued a notice pursuant to paragraph 99ADH(1)(d) within the required timeframe that sets out the following information:
    • the adjusted approved ex-manufacturer price (this is equivalent to the WADP);
    • the adjusted approved price to pharmacists (this is calculated in accordance with the method set out in the Regulations and is based on the adjusted approved ex-manufacturer price) ; and
    • the reduction day.

This instrument determines, pursuant to subsection 99ADB(4), the WADP of a number of brands of pharmaceutical items (the first items). This instrument also determines, pursuant to subsection 99ADB(5), the WADP of every brand of every pharmaceutical item that has the same drug and manner of administration as the first items. This instrument relates, in accordance with the Regulations, to the annual reporting period (data collection period) of
1 September 2009 to 31 August 2010. The proposed reduction day for the brands of pharmaceutical items contained in this instrument is 1 August 2011.

This instrument also revokes the Determination made under subsections 99ADB(4) and (5) of the Act on 22 January 2010 (“PB 13 of 2010”). PB 13 of 2010 determined the previous WADP for some of the brands of pharmaceutical items that are contained in this instrument. The reduction day for brands of pharmaceutical items that had a WADP determined in
PB 13 of 2010 was 1 August 2010.

The instrument is expressed to commence on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Consultation

This instrument affects pharmaceutical companies with medicines listed on the PBS.  Pharmaceutical companies have been consulted in relation to the introduction of price disclosure requirements during both the policy development and implementation phases.  This has occurred through meetings with both peak body organisations and individual companies.  Information on this measure has been disseminated through peak industry bodies and during regular meetings with a Stakeholder Reference Group.  Peak bodies were provided with the opportunity to comment on the Guide to the PBS Reform legislation and the Exposure Draft of the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Bill 2007.

Pharmaceutical companies with a brand of a pharmaceutical item subject to the price disclosure requirements have been provided further information on the requirements by letter and have disclosed information relevant to this determination directly to the Department of Health and Ageing (the Department).  The Department has also provided to the responsible persons that disclosed information to the Department an opportunity to check that the information disclosed to the Department has been translated correctly to Departmental data files.  This was done prior to that data being used to undertake the calculations set out in the Regulations required to arrive at the weighted average disclosed price.

 

 

Overview

The National Health Act 1953 was enacted to provide a legal framework for the administration of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), ensuring Australians have reliable, timely, and affordable access to a wide range of medicines. This Act is administered by the Australian Parliament and is designed to achieve the policy objective of making essential medications accessible to all Australians at a reasonable cost. The Act was amended in 2007 and 2010 to introduce price disclosure requirements, which aim to ensure transparency in the pricing of pharmaceutical items on the PBS. This legislative instrument, made pursuant to subsections 99ADB(4) and 99ADB(5) of the Act, determines the weighted average disclosed price (WADP) for certain brands of pharmaceutical items for the annual reporting period ending 31 August 2010, and sets a reduction day of 1 August 2011. This determination is based on the data collected under the price disclosure requirements and revokes a previous determination made in 2010. Pharmaceutical companies and relevant stakeholders have been consulted extensively during the policy development and implementation phases.

Scope and Application

The instrument, F2011L00151, is a legislative determination under subsections 99ADB(4) and 99ADB(5) of the National Health Act 1953, and it establishes the weighted average disclosed price (WADP) for specific brands of pharmaceutical items within the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). The PBS is the legislative framework through which the Commonwealth ensures affordable access to a range of medicines for all Australians. The Act applies to pharmaceutical companies that have brands of pharmaceutical items listed under the PBS. These companies are required to comply with the price disclosure requirements, which may be mandatory or voluntary, depending on the circumstances. The Minister uses disclosed price information to determine the WADP for each specified brand of pharmaceutical item, following the method outlined in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960. This instrument specifically relates to the annual reporting period of 1 September 2009 to 31 August 2010, with a proposed reduction day of 1 August 2011 for the prices of the affected brands. It also revokes the previous determination made on 22 January 2010, which had a reduction day of 1 August 2010. The instrument commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Key Provisions

The National Health Act 1953, through its Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), provides a comprehensive framework for ensuring Australians have access to affordable medicines. Under this Act, the Minister determines the weighted average disclosed price (WADP) for certain brands of pharmaceutical items, as detailed in sections 99ADB(4) and 99ADB(5). The WADP is a critical metric, calculated using information disclosed by responsible persons during specified periods, in accordance with the method outlined in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960. Once the WADP is determined, the Act mandates that the Minister must also determine the WADP for every brand of every pharmaceutical item that shares the same drug and manner of administration, ensuring consistency and fairness across similar products. Responsible persons, which include pharmaceutical companies and manufacturers, have specific obligations under this legislation. They are required to disclose relevant price information to the Department of Health and Ageing during the stipulated data collection periods. This disclosure is essential for the Minister to accurately calculate the WADP and subsequently implement any necessary price reductions for the PBS. Additionally, responsible persons must ensure that the information provided is accurate and correctly translated into the Departmental data files, facilitating the regulatory process. Failure to comply with the price disclosure requirements or providing inaccurate information can lead to significant consequences. While the Act does not explicitly outline criminal penalties for non-compliance, it does establish civil penalties that can be enforced. These penalties serve as a deterrent to ensure adherence to the prescribed obligations. Furthermore, inaccurate price disclosure can result in incorrect WADP calculations, potentially leading to unfair pricing on the PBS, which can have broader implications for the scheme's integrity and affordability. It is therefore imperative for responsible persons to meticulously follow the mandated procedures to avoid any adverse outcomes.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.