National Health Act 1953 - Determination made pursuant to subsections 99ADB(4) and 99ADB(5) (No. PB 13 of 2010)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2010L00128 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

INSTRUMENT NUMBER PB 13 OF 2010

 

NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953

 

DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTIONS 99ADB (4) and 99ADB (5)

 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE DISCLOSED PRICE

 

Purpose and operation

This legislative instrument is made pursuant to subsections 99ADB (4) and 99ADB(5) of the National Health Act 1953 (“the Act”) and determines the weighted average disclosed price for certain brands of pharmaceutical items.

Part VII of the Act is the legislative basis for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) by which the Commonwealth provides reliable, timely, and affordable access to a wide range of medicines for all Australians.

Subsection 85(1) provides that benefits are to be provided by the Commonwealth in accordance with Part VII in respect of pharmaceutical benefits.

Drugs and medicinal preparations to which Part VII applies are declared by the Minister by legislative instrument to be so under subsection 85(2) of the Act. These are listed drugs as defined in subsection 84(1).

The Minister may also determine, by legislative instrument, the form or forms of a listed drug by reference to strength, type of unit, size of unit or otherwise (subsection 85(3)); the manner of administration of the form of the listed drug so determined (subsection 85(5)); and a brand of the pharmaceutical item (subsection 85(6)). A pharmaceutical item is a listed drug in a form determined under subsection 85(3) of the Act and with a manner of administration for that form of the drug determined under subsection 85(5) of the Act. A brand of a pharmaceutical item is a pharmaceutical benefit under Part VII of the Act.

Amendments to the Act made by the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Act 2007 (the Amending Act), which commenced on 1 August 2007, included provisions in relation to statutory price reductions, price disclosure, and guarantee of supply. The purpose of the Amending Act was to position the PBS for the future by changing, or placing in the legislation, the way in which certain drugs are priced at the time of listing, or after they are listed on the PBS. New pricing arrangements contained in the Amending Act have enabled the Government to capture the benefits of competition where drugs have multiple brands, providing the foundation for a sustainable PBS.

Subsections 99ADB (4) and (5) are located in Division 3B of the Act, which relates to price disclosure. Division 3B requires the responsible persons for certain brands of pharmaceutical items to comply with price disclosure requirements for each supply of a relevant brand of a pharmaceutical item. In some circumstances price disclosure is mandatory, and in others it is voluntary. In addition, Division 3B provides for reduction to the approved price to pharmacists of the brand of the pharmaceutical item in specified circumstances.

Subsection 99ADB (1) defines various terms used in Division 3B. One of these terms is the “weighted average disclosed price”. The weighted average disclosed price (“WADP”) of a brand of a pharmaceutical item is the price determined by the Minister pursuant to subsection 99ADB (4) or 99ADB (5).

Subsection 99ADB(4) provides that the Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine the WADP of a brand of a pharmaceutical item in accordance with the method set out in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960 (“the Regulations”).  The Minister uses information disclosed under the price disclosure requirements related to a particular period, as set out in the Regulations, to arrive at the WADP.

Subsection 99ADB (5) provides that if the Minister determines the WADP for one brand of a pharmaceutical item under subsection 99ADB (4) (“the first item”), then the Minister must, by legislative instrument, determine the WADP for every brand of every pharmaceutical item with the same drug and the same manner of administration as the first item. The WADP for these brands of pharmaceutical items is also calculated in accordance with the method set out in the Regulations.

Section 99ADH sets out when a price reduction, based on price disclosure, will occur, and how the new price will be set. Price disclosure related price reductions may only occur on 1 April or 1 August, being the reduction days prescribed by the Regulations.  

In summary, section 99ADH will apply to a brand of pharmaceutical item if the following requirements are met:

  • the Minister determines the WADP of a brand of a pharmaceutical item under subsection 99ADB(4) or 99ADB (5); 
  • a price agreement or price determination is in force in relation to that brand of a pharmaceutical item;
  • the WADP of the brand of pharmaceutical item is at least 10% less than its approved ex-manufacturer price; and
  • the responsible person was issued a notice pursuant to paragraph 99ADH(1)(d) within the required timeframe that sets out the following information:
    • the adjusted approved ex-manufacturer price (this is equivalent to the WADP);
    • the adjusted approved price to pharmacists (this is calculated in accordance with the method set out in the Regulations and is based on the adjusted approved ex-manufacturer price) ; and
    • the reduction day.

This instrument determines, pursuant to subsection 99ADB(4), the WADP of a number of brands of pharmaceutical items (the first items). This instrument also determines, pursuant to subsection 99ADB(5), the WADP of every brand of every pharmaceutical item that has the same drug and manner of administration as the first items. This instrument relates, in accordance with the Regulations, to the annual reporting period (data collection period) of 1 September 2008 to 31 August 2009. The proposed reduction day for the brands of pharmaceutical items contained in this instrument is 1 August 2010.

The instrument is expressed to commence the later of:

(1)   immediately after the commencement of PB12 of 2010; or

(2)   the day after it is registered.

PB 12 of 2010 varies PB 74 of 2009 as amended (the July 2009 WADP determination) to remove certain brands of pharmaceutical items which will not be subject to a price disclosure related price reduction on 1 April 2010.

 

Consultation

This instrument affects pharmaceutical companies with medicines listed on the PBS.  Pharmaceutical companies have been consulted in relation to the introduction of price disclosure requirements during both the policy development and implementation phases.  This has occurred through meetings with both peak body organisations and individual companies.  Information on this measure has been disseminated through peak industry bodies and during regular meetings with a Stakeholder Reference Group.  Peak bodies were provided with the opportunity to comment on the Guide to the PBS Reform legislation and the Exposure Draft of the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Bill 2007.

Pharmaceutical companies with a brand of a pharmaceutical item subject to the price disclosure requirements have been provided further information on the requirements by letter and have disclosed information relevant to this determination directly to the Department of Health and Ageing (the Department).  The Department has also provided to the responsible persons that disclosed information to the Department an opportunity to check that the information disclosed to the Department has been translated correctly to Departmental data files.  This was done prior to that data being used to undertake the calculations set out in the Regulations required to arrive at the weighted average disclosed price.

 

 

Overview

The National Health Act 1953 was enacted to provide a legislative framework for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), ensuring that Australians have reliable, timely, and affordable access to a wide range of medicines. The Act was amended by the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Act 2007 to address issues related to statutory price reductions, price disclosure, and the guarantee of supply, ultimately positioning the PBS for the future by altering the way in which certain drugs are priced. This legislative instrument, made under subsections 99ADB(4) and 99ADB(5) of the National Health Act 1953, determines the weighted average disclosed price (WADP) for specific brands of pharmaceutical items. The Minister calculates the WADP using information disclosed under the price disclosure requirements, as outlined in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960. This determination affects pharmaceutical companies with medicines listed on the PBS and is based on data from the annual reporting period of 1 September 2008 to 31 August 2009. The policy objective is to establish a sustainable PBS by capturing the benefits of competition where drugs have multiple brands, and to ensure that price disclosure requirements are met to facilitate potential price reductions.

Scope and Application

The National Health Act 1953, through its legislative instrument F2010L00128, applies to pharmaceutical companies with brands of pharmaceutical items listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). The Act's provisions under Division 3B, specifically subsections 99ADB(4) and 99ADB(5), require responsible persons for certain pharmaceutical brands to comply with price disclosure requirements. This includes determining the Weighted Average Disclosed Price (WADP) for specified brands, which is used to set the approved price to pharmacists. The Minister calculates the WADP using data from the annual reporting period and applies the results to all brands of pharmaceutical items with the same drug and manner of administration as the initially determined brands. The Act applies nationally across Australia, and its provisions are implemented through legislative instruments and regulations. Any exclusions or exemptions from these requirements are not specified in the provided text, but the instrument is designed to ensure that pharmaceutical companies are aware of and comply with the price disclosure requirements to maintain the affordability and sustainability of the PBS.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the legislation, specifically sections 99ADB (4) and 99ADB (5), empower the Minister to determine the weighted average disclosed price (WADP) for certain brands of pharmaceutical items listed under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Under subsection 99ADB (4), the Minister can determine the WADP for a particular brand of a pharmaceutical item. If the Minister does so, subsection 99ADB (5) requires the Minister to also determine the WADP for every brand of every pharmaceutical item that shares the same drug and manner of administration as the initial brand. The WADP is calculated using the method outlined in the National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960, which relies on price disclosure information gathered over a specific period. The legislation also includes provisions for price reductions based on the disclosed prices, which can occur on 1 April or 1 August, as prescribed by the Regulations. The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Pharmaceutical companies with brands listed on the PBS must comply with the price disclosure requirements, which may be either mandatory or voluntary, depending on the circumstances. These companies must disclose relevant pricing information to the Department of Health and Ageing, which is then used to calculate the WADP. The Minister, using this disclosed information, determines the WADP for relevant brands. Additionally, if certain conditions are met, such as the WADP being at least 10% less than the approved ex-manufacturer price, price reductions may be applied. Responsible persons must also comply with notices issued by the Minister, which outline the adjusted approved prices and the applicable reduction day. Failure to comply with the obligations and requirements set forth in the Act can lead to various consequences. While the Act does not explicitly detail specific offences or penalties for non-compliance with the price disclosure requirements, general principles of administrative law and the National Health Act 1953 might apply. For example, non-compliance with statutory requirements can result in administrative actions, including notices to rectify, fines, or other enforcement measures. Additionally, the Act might provide for civil or criminal penalties for more severe breaches, although the specifics are not outlined in the provided text. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, and could potentially include substantial fines and other legal consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Pharmaceutical Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Price Controls

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.