National Health Act 1953 - Amendment determination under section 99ADB - weighted average disclosed price (No. PB 95 of 2009)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2009L03722 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

 

INSTRUMENT NUMBER PB 95 OF 2009

 

 

NATIONAL HEALTH ACT 1953

 

 

AMENDMENT DETERMINATION UNDER SECTION 99ADB

 

 

Purpose and operation

Part VII of the National Health Act 1953 (the Act) is the legislative basis for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) by which the Commonwealth provides reliable, timely, and affordable access to a wide range of medicines for all Australians.

Subsection 85(1) provides that benefits are to be provided by the Commonwealth in accordance with Part VII in respect of pharmaceutical benefits.

Drugs and medicinal preparations to which Part VII applies are declared by the Minister by legislative instrument to be so under subsection 85(2).  These are listed drugs as defined in subsection 84(1). 

The Minister can, by legislative instrument, determine the form or forms of a listed drug by reference to strength, type of unit, size of unit or otherwise (subsection 85(3)); the manner of administration of the form of the listed drug so determined (subsection 85(5)); and a brand of the pharmaceutical item (subsection 85(6)).  A pharmaceutical item is a listed drug in a form determined under subsection 85(3) and with a manner of administration for that form of the drug determined under subsection 85(5) of the Act. A brand of a pharmaceutical item is a pharmaceutical benefit under Part VII of the Act.

Amendments to the Act made by the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Act 2007 (the Amending Act), which commenced on 1 August 2007, included provisions in relation to statutory price reductions, price disclosure, and guarantee of supply.  The purpose of the Amending Act was to position the PBS for the future by changing, or placing in the legislation, the way in which certain drugs are priced at the time of listing, or after they are listed on the PBS. New pricing arrangements contained in the Amending Act have enabled the government to capture the benefits of competition where drugs have multiple brands, providing the foundation for a sustainable PBS.

Division 3B of the Act requires the responsible person for certain brands of pharmaceutical items to comply with price disclosure requirements for each supply of a relevant brand of a pharmaceutical item.  In some circumstances price disclosure is mandatory, and in others it is voluntary.

Section 99ADB defines various terms used in Division 3B. One of these terms is the “weighted average disclosed price”. In summary, the weighted average disclosed price of a brand of a pharmaceutical item is the price determined by the Minister in accordance with subsection 99ADB(4) or subsection 99ADB(5).

Under subsection 99ADB(4) the Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine the weighted average disclosed price of a brand of a pharmaceutical item in accordance with the method set out in the regulations.  The Minister will use information disclosed under the price disclosure requirements related to a particular period, along with other information referred to in the method set out in the regulations, to arrive at the weighted average disclosed price.

Under subsection 99ADB(5), if the Minister determines a weighted average disclosed price for one brand of a pharmaceutical item under s99ADB(4) then the Minister must, by legislative instrument, do so for all brands of a pharmaceutical item with the same drug and the same manner of administration. The weighted average disclosed price for these brands of pharmaceutical items will be calculated in accordance with the method set out in the regulations.

Section 99ADH sets out when a price reduction, based on price disclosure, will occur, and how the new price will be set.

In summary, a price reduction will occur if:

  • the Minister determines the weighted average disclosed price of a brand of a pharmaceutical item under section 99ADB; 
  • a price agreement or price determination applies in relation to that brand of a pharmaceutical item;
  • the weighted average disclosed price of the brand of pharmaceutical item is at least 10% less than the approved ex-manufacturer price; and
  • the responsible person is notified of the new adjusted approved ex-manufacturer price (that is equal to the weighted average disclosed price), the adjusted approved price to pharmacist and the day the adjusted approved price to pharmacist comes into force.

The adjusted approved price to pharmacist will be based on the adjusted approved ex-manufacturer price using the method set out in the regulations.

Price reductions that result from price disclosure will apply to all brands and forms of the drug with the same manner of administration. This will be the case irrespective of whether the brands themselves were subject to price disclosure requirements.

This instrument amends the weighted average disclosed price determined on 31 July 2009 for brands of certain pharmaceutical items containing orally administered meloxicam. This instrument also amends the weighted average disclosed price determined on 31 July 2009 of every brand of every pharmaceutical item that has the same drug and manner of administration as the first items.  This amendment to the determination made on 30 July 2009 results from submission, by some responsible persons, of amended data used to arrive at the weighted average disclosed price.

A provision-by provision description of the instrument is contained in the Attachment.

The instrument is expressed to commence on 30 September 2009.  It amends the instrument that was made on 30 July 2009 and commenced on 31 July 2009 (PB 74 of 2009).

 

Consultations

This instrument affects pharmaceutical companies with medicines listed on the PBS.  Pharmaceutical companies have been consulted in relation to the introduction of price disclosure requirements during both the policy development and implementation phases.  This has occurred through meetings with both peak body organisations and individual companies.  Information on this measure has been disseminated through peak industry bodies and during regular meetings with a Stakeholder Reference Group.  Peak bodies were provided with the opportunity to comment on the Guide to the PBS Reform legislation and the Exposure Draft of the National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Bill 2007.

Pharmaceutical companies with a brand of a pharmaceutical item subject to the price disclosure requirements have been provided further information on the requirements by letter and have disclosed information relevant to this determination directly to the Department of Health and Ageing (the Department).  The Department provided to the responsible persons that disclosed information to the Department an opportunity to check that the information disclosed to the Department had been translated correctly to Departmental data files.  After the making of the determination on 30 July 2009 some amended data was submitted to the Department.  The amended data was then used to undertake the calculations set out in the Regulations required to arrive at the weighted average disclosed price.


ATTACHMENT

Paragraph 1: Provides that the instrument commences on 30 September 2009.

Paragraph 2: Provides that instrument PB 74 of 2009 is amended.

Paragraph 3: Determines the amended weighted average disclosed price of a brand of various pharmaceutical items (the first items) as set out in Schedule 1.

Paragraph 4:  Determines the amended weighted average disclosed price of every brand of every pharmaceutical item that has the same drug and manner of administration as the first items, as set out in Schedule 2.

Schedule 1: [1] Sets out the amended weighted average disclosed price of a brand of the first items.

 [2] Sets out the amendment to the wording for the column headed ‘Form’ for two pharmaceutical items.

Schedule 2:  Sets out the amended weighted average disclosed price of every brand of every pharmaceutical item that has the same drug and same manner of administration as the first items.

 

 

 

Overview

The National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) Act 2007 was enacted to address the need for sustainable and affordable access to a wide range of medicines for all Australians by amending the National Health Act 1953. This legislation introduced significant changes to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) to ensure its viability in the long term, particularly by introducing statutory price reductions, price disclosure requirements, and a guarantee of supply. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia with the policy objective of ensuring that the PBS remains financially sustainable while providing reliable access to affordable medicines. The explanatory statement for the instrument PB 95 of 2009, which amends the weighted average disclosed price for certain pharmaceutical items, indicates that this amendment arises from the need to adjust prices based on updated data submitted by responsible persons, ensuring that the PBS reflects accurate market prices and promotes competition among pharmaceutical brands.

Scope and Application

The instrument in question amends the National Health Act 1953, specifically focusing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) administered by the Commonwealth to ensure Australians have access to affordable medications. The amendment pertains to the determination of the weighted average disclosed price for certain pharmaceutical items containing orally administered meloxicam, correcting data submitted by pharmaceutical companies that was used in an earlier determination. This instrument applies to pharmaceutical companies with brands of pharmaceutical items listed on the PBS, particularly those involved in the supply of orally administered meloxicam. The amendment affects these companies by altering the weighted average disclosed price for specified brands, which influences the price reductions and adjustments set under the PBS. The instrument operates nationally and amends the earlier determination made on 30 July 2009, coming into effect on 30 September 2009. It adjusts the pricing based on the corrected data submitted by the responsible persons, ensuring the accuracy of the weighted average disclosed price, which is critical for determining price reductions and adjustments under the PBS.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the instrument, F2009L03722, amend the weighted average disclosed price for certain brands of pharmaceutical items containing orally administered meloxicam, as well as for every brand of every pharmaceutical item with the same drug and manner of administration, as set out in Schedules 1 and 2 (subsection 99ADB(4)). The instrument amends the determination made on 30 July 2009, which was contained in instrument PB 74 of 2009. The amended weighted average disclosed prices are based on data submitted by responsible persons after the initial determination, and these adjustments are made to reflect any changes in the disclosed information (subsection 99ADB(5)). The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Firstly, responsible persons for brands of pharmaceutical items subject to price disclosure requirements must comply with these requirements, which include disclosing prices for each supply of a relevant brand (subsection 99ADB(4)). Secondly, the Minister is responsible for determining the weighted average disclosed price using the method set out in the regulations, which involves taking into account the disclosed price information and other relevant data (subsection 99ADB(4)). Thirdly, the Minister must ensure that a price reduction based on price disclosure occurs if certain criteria are met, including the weighted average disclosed price being at least 10% less than the approved ex-manufacturer price (subsection 99ADH). The instrument also outlines the potential consequences for non-compliance with the Act. Although the explanatory statement does not explicitly detail the penalties for breaches, it is reasonable to infer that failure to comply with the price disclosure requirements or the obligations of the Minister could result in civil or administrative penalties. These penalties might include fines or other enforcement actions as stipulated under the broader National Health Act 1953 or any related regulations. Additionally, if the non-compliance leads to significant market distortions or public health risks, it could potentially result in more severe penalties or legal actions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Pharmaceutical Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Price Control
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.